News 
 State News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 Livestock's $50m cleaning bill 

Livestock's $50m cleaning bill

17 Jan, 2010 03:00 AM
LACK of good livestock preparation by producers prior to transport is costing the nation's livestock carrier industry more than $50 million per annum in excessive washout costs, according to a new report released by the Australian Livestock Transporters Association.

The report resulted from an ALTA membership survey conducted in late 2009 in relation to preparation of livestock for transport and effluent spill from loaded stock crates, with results collated and presented by ALTA executive director Luke Faser.

The issue initially gained prominence in the ALTA/MLA 2007 membership survey where professional transporters suggested poor preparation was the number one animal welfare issue facing the industry.

Some 35 professional livestock transport companies from across all States responded to ALTA’s most recent 2009 survey.

As a result of the survey, ALTA has identified a number of key issues, including that a lack of awareness of good pre-transport stock preparation is widespread, and dirty truck crate washouts due to poor preparation is a significant "hidden" cost.

Analysis of the survey results suggest total cost of washouts for the stock carrier industry is in the order of $50.2 million per annum, while the water consumed for the task is approximately six billion litres per annum.

The ALTA report states that even marginal improvements in livestock preparation pre-transport would lead to less need for costly washouts - for example, reducing the number of average washouts by 25pc would improve the productivity of the sector by $12.55 million per annum and create a saving of 1.5 billion litres of water.

Beyond the financial costs, ALTA says heavy effluent loss in transit due to poor stock preparation is bad for many reasons.

Those reasons include: stock standing in thick effluent slurry will slip and fall more easily; dirty stock can shut down a processing plant; dirty stock may need to be washed individually before being processed, creating extra cost, risk and delay; and people who cause dangerous effluent slicks on roads can be prosecuted.

The report also reiterated the point that MSA slaughter pathway requirements are not a barrier to good preparation.

"The livestock production sector has often refused to take animals off green feed prior to transport by citing Meat Standards Australia 'requirements' to send animals 'full' to slaughter so as to stay within a maximum 24-hour off water slaughter pathway best practice," the report states.

"The findings of this ALTA survey suggests that actual Australian livestock transport journeys are in a great majority of cases quite short (on average, less than six hours, with maximum outer limits of transport times of 12 hours).

"As such, a short pre-transport preparation off green feed prior to transport can be afforded while still staying comfortably within the MSA 24-hour recommended limit.

"Loading animals full of green feed and water right up to point of loading in the mistaken belief that MSA requires this to occur represents a significant increase in effluent spill intensity."

So what exactly does good pre-transport livestock preparation mean?

According to ALTA, it means having stock presented for transport that are as calm and healthy for the journey ahead as possible.

"Excessive stress pre-transport or inherent weakness in the stock to be transported, the wrong approach to feeding and watering the animals or failure to manage excessive heat load build-up can all lead to stressful and risky transport episodes," the report states.

"This doesn't just increase the risk of effluent spill on the road and having stock covered in effluent themselves - it has significant animal welfare and food safety implications."

As a result of the survey findings, a draft guide "Good Stock Preparation Guide Pre-Transport" has been developed by a Stock Transport Effluent Spill Taskforce made up of the ALTA, the Australian Livestock and Property Agents Association, NSW Farmers Association, the Australian Lot Feeders Association and the Australian Meat Industry Council.

It is hoped the draft guide will be endorsed and a national industry guide to good pre-transport preparation developed early this year.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
When enough carriers are seriously prosecuted for leaving treacherously slippery (and highly corrosive) swathes of crap on the roads, something may change. At present the carriers, Police and RTA seem to not be very interested in this as a road safety issue, yet if they were caught dropping diesel on the road they'd be fined, and then sued by anyone who crashed because of the spillage. The road rules are very clear on spillages from vehicles. As a cattle producer, I have never been asked by a carrier whether my stock have been "off feed" before loading. One solution to the spillage problem might be to add a bit higher coaming and a collection tank on either end of the trucks/trailers.
Posted by AJ, 18/01/2010 9:18:00 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Hang on...all this advice has been around for years, so why is it that farmers need to be reminded again and again and again? Is it because they are stupid? They obviously are.
Posted by Harry, 18/01/2010 1:24:38 PM, on Queensland Country Life
They obviously are -- Harry.
Posted by Barker, 18/01/2010 5:27:25 PM, on Queensland Country Life
The answer is simple .... take the trucks off the roads and use trains. How many times have road users been 'trapped' behind a loaded cattle truck crawling up a hill with oncoming traffic and double lines with cow juice spraying over their vehicles.... The trucks should be washed out anyway before going to another property.... particularly if they have been in ticky country or transporting buffalo fly.
Posted by pepper, 18/01/2010 6:15:52 PM, on Queensland Country Life
thats right Pepper, of course there are rail lines everywhere...NOT! Qld is the only rail service that still carries livestock on its network. Albeit a fast diminishing service that is handing over to Coal.
Posted by yoo betcha, 7/03/2010 5:59:52 PM, on Queensland Country Life

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...