News 
 State News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 Beef plan ‘naive’, says MLA 

Beef plan ‘naive’, says MLA

01 Aug, 2010 02:00 AM
THE recently released beef strategic plan has been labelled “naive” by Meat and Livestock Australia’s (MLA’s) chairman, Don Heatley, who said the plan would only confuse customers and add to duplication, not reduce it.

The plan was prepared by solicitors, Hunt Partners, Sydney, following the Armidale beef forum earlier this year and was presented to the audience at the Rockhampton beef forum.

The strategic plan proposes to reduce producer expenditure, increase returns and reduce duplication by splitting MLA into a sheep and beef corporation, introducing a national beef grading scheme, abolishing the Australian Meat Processor Corporation (AMPC) and Red Meat Advisory Council and removing the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service (AQIS) charges by putting them back onto government.

Hunt Partners partner, Norman Hunt, said a national grading system more like the US model of a carcase-based grading system – as opposed to the existing Meat Standards Australia (MSA) cuts-based system – would help capture more of the domestic market beef for grading, while a restructure of research and development bodies was expected to reduce costs and duplication.

The plan estimated a nationally adopted grading system could increase per capita annual consumption of beef by 2.5 kilograms to 36.3kg a year, which it estimated would take the domestic beef consumption to 62 per cent of current beef production.

Mr Hunt said the problem with MSA was that it hadn’t been adopted by large sectors of the industry (including much of the supermarket sector), and so most beef Australians ate was ungraded, “and a lucky dip for eating quality”.

“If uptake of MSA was able to be extended to embrace most of the beef sold on the domestic market, we would end up with the same result (as the strategic plan aims for),” he said.

The release of the plan comes soon after MLA announced MSA’s year-on-year increase in uptake of about 27pc, to take the number of MSA-graded carcases to 1.25 million for the year to the end of June.

Mr Heatley said MSA was now making headway into the supermarkets, with Costco and IGA stores stocking MSA-graded beef, which demonstrated a slow, but progressively expanding market share for graded beef.

While the carcase-based grading scheme was working well in the US, Mr Heatley said the adoption of a similar system wouldn’t work as well in Australia because the US system was based on subjective assumptions and the US had a different production system.

He said the US system wasn’t “test driven” with consumers to see what they wanted.

“MSA has repeatedly put meat in front of consumers for sensory testing to see what they want, and what the industry needs to provide,” Mr Heatley said.

“It should be the industry listening to the consumer.”

He said the US system was based on an industry with about 98pc grain finishing, whereas Australia finishes only about 34pc of its beef on grain.

As for the rate of uptake of the US system, he said it took 20 years before it gained widespread acceptance, so it was still early days for MSA.

The proposal to restructure the research and development (R and D) sector was to tackle what Mr Hunt said was a system which duplicated research and channelled levies into limited areas of industry.

He said MLA and the AMPC both had R and D programs allowing individual companies to apply for jointly funded programs.

He said these were partially funded by industry levies, but the only party gaining from the research was often the successful applicant, rather than the whole of industry.

Therefore, the plan proposed new R and D bodies be developed which were fully funded by government.

“The whole industry wants to decrease costs by government, but (this plan) is an aspirational wish list which different bodies have been lobbying for for many years,” Mr Heatley said.

“It is a work in progress and I find it a little naive to find anybody could think the current industry structures weren’t set up to achieve this already.”

Mr Heatley said the plan came as MLA was about to launch its $5 million campaign which will include an MSA logo with an eating quality description and cooking methods at point of sale.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Meat industry leaders with their advisors & consultants failed to recognise to negotiate a commercial deal with a domestic meat marketing logo @ the early stages with the TV food cooking phenomena. MasterChef - to promote our clean, green & QA meat proteins. The Coles food company did....
Posted by leucaus, 1/08/2010 7:21:52 PM, on Queensland Country Life
For cattle producers to be picking up the tab for a red meat retail marketing campaign, in the vain hope that an increase in the retail price will trickle down through the long and complex retail, transport and processing chain to finally give them an increase in price for their cattle, is just bizarre. What is even more bizarre is that after 4 decades of conclusive proof that this simply doesn't work because any increase in retail price is absorbed by the supply chain, long before it gets to the cattle producers. There are still cattle producers wanting to throw their money at this. Red meat retail marketing campaigns should be run and paid for by a red meat retail marketers, this is supposed to be where their field of expertise lies.
Posted by Qlander, 2/08/2010 8:53:45 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Mince all cattle with full mouth [8 teeth] - this will rid the industry of cows getting slipped in. I recently saw meat in a grocery store from Teys with an outside sticker on it which said MSA graded - what does that mean? 90% of bad eating experiences would be gone if 8 teeth cattle were removed from sale. Don Heatley & Agforce are too frightened to take processors on with this one.
Posted by les, 2/08/2010 12:34:06 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Well said Qlander.
Posted by tj, 2/08/2010 12:57:34 PM, on Queensland Country Life
MSA is a classic example of cattle producers getting involved in red meat retail marketing. MSA wasn't conceived to sell red meat, it was conceived to sell cattle, and not just any cattle but a particular type of cattle, from a particular geographical area. Why should producers who don't breed those type of cattle, or come from that geographical area pick up the tab for it?
Posted by Qlander, 2/08/2010 5:43:12 PM, on Queensland Country Life

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...