News 
 State News 
 Horticulture 
 General 
 Bats, not growers, have Govt ear 

Bats, not growers, have Govt ear

22 Jan, 2009 04:21 PM
A carefully managed ministerial visit to Stanthorpe last week included only a handful of invited farmers to meet with officials and engage in talks after the district was hit by one of the worst flying fox attacks in recent memory late last year.

While angry farmers counting the cost were kept away from attending, getting the ear of Primary Industries Minister Tim Mulherin was no trouble for flying fox campaigner and former Queensland Conservation Council chair, Dr Carol Booth.

Such is the pull of the animal rights activist that she was able to delay Mr Mulherin's departure for the local airstrip only moments after minders had tried to cut short a press conference to get him to his waiting plane.

The pair chatted for about a minute but the nature of their brief discussion is not known to QCL.

Dr Booth is a strident defender of bats but no friend of primary producers, once writing:

"It's hard to forgive farmers for slaughtering thousands of flying foxes and calling it crop protection.

"And it's even harder to forgive a government department charged with protecting our wildlife for allowing or ignoring such slaughter."

After walking away from the Primary Industries Minister's car, Dr Booth said she had made an offer to work with Mr Mulherin's still to be formed flying fox management working group, while acknowledging her formal role in getting the EPA to ban flying fox shooting last year.

"Queensland Conservation Council made the original application to have the ban considered in 2005," she said.

"It took them a long time to consider the issue and weigh up the evidence."

Weeks earlier in news reports, Dr Booth said farmers were exaggerating their stone fruit losses to get compensation and to continue shooting the animals.

Dr Booth said she believed noise and light deterrents were better for farmers because it would mean an end to all-night shifts shooting bats and all-day missions shooting birds.

Ballandean stone fruit grower Ian Mungall, said it showed a lack of understanding of farming.

He said he wasn't fighting to get his shooting permit back, but was more interested in fast, workable solutions to protect his crops.

"I can tell you that after a hard day's work, the last thing I feel like doing is heading out at night to shoot bats," he said.

"Farmers have better things to do with their time. If we're up all night shooting bats and out all day shooting birds, I don't know when we'd get any farming done."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This story has it all wrong. I managed by dint of a fast trot to get in a fleeting word with the Minister before he left for the airport, congratulating him on a constructive meeting with growers and offering to cooperate with the working group. Nothing more. It is also totally wrong to say that 'I am no friend of primary producers'. Rather, I am no friend of that now small subset of growers who kill flying-foxes (now illegal), further endangering already threatened species. Their conservation and welfare is important too, and growers have other choices.
Posted by Carol Booth, 22/01/2009 7:34:24 PM
It's great news that farmers don't want to be able to shoot bats any more. I did not get this from any of Growcom's other publicity. I thought fast workable solutions were already available in the form of netting and that netting had been taken up by large numbers of farmers. Perhaps Ian Mungall could be more specific about what it is that they do want, since he has explicitly ruled out a return to shooting.
Posted by Megan Jones, 22/01/2009 10:00:33 PM
Carol Booth and all the others: Next year you might want to send me a physical address so that I can send you all the Lychees (Net Protected) that have been damaged, pissed on, and regurgitated on, by the love of your life!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Pe, 23/01/2009 3:36:59 PM
Carol and Megan: My main complaint with the banning is its sudden implimentation.

I had one of the larger damage mitigation permits for the culling of flying foxes before the ban. Over the years, by fine tuning our techniques, we had managed our crop losses to flying foxes and birds to 2-3pc.

This has not been by culling more, but culling smarter.

I got to find out about the ban on TV. As a large holder of a permit and being heavily affected, you would expect that I would have been contacted or consulted to find out what really happens on a commercial orchard rahter than what is banded around by others to promote their cause.

The inaccurate information that were told to justify this ban were mind boggling.

I, like Ian Mungall, get no joy at shooting flying foxes or birds, but do so to protect my crop and feed my family. We also utilise other forms of deterants such as lights, noises, - but these are pretty much useless.

We also use throw-over netting but the bats chewed straight through it or damaged the fruit near the net. When the ban was announced, we called around the commercial net installers to get prices and timing. Cost would be $500k and it would be August 09 due to backlog of orders.

Given the very short timeline between the announcement of the ban and our harvest season, we were left with a crop that cannot be protected.

The season is now finished and we lost 80-90pc of the crop. We now face financial losses that will most likely take the farm.

So what did we want? Some consultation with the actual farmers likely to be affected. Time to adjust our farming practice to other approved methods. Assistance to those wanting to adopt those methods.

I find it interesting that the major causes of flying fox deaths are not being targeted. I expect the Queensland Conservation Council to now lobby for the removal of all barbed wire, overhead wires and the destruction of habitat by housing/industrial subdivisions.

Oh no, wait, that would involve potential areas in which its members might want to live.

Posted by The orchardist, 2/02/2009 4:02:50 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
While angry farmers may have been kept away from Primary Industries Minister Tim Mulherin, there appeared little restriction on flying fox campaigner and former Queensland Conservation Council chair Dr Carol Booth.
While angry farmers may have been kept away from Primary Industries Minister Tim Mulherin, there appeared little restriction on flying fox campaigner and former Queensland Conservation Council chair Dr Carol Booth.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should Nationals Senator Barnaby Joyce try a move to the House of Representatives at the next Federal election?

Yes
(51.8%)

No
(42.1%)

Other
(6.1%)

Total Votes: 444
Poll Date: 18 January, 2009

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Metromax
 
Pro-Tech
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
photo gallery
 
QCL Facebook
 
QCL Twitter


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...