News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Xstrata 'megamine' in court 

Xstrata 'megamine' in court

03 Sep, 2011 04:00 AM
CONCERNS about the impact of road closures and coal dust on pastures dominated proceedings during the Xstrata "megamine" coal project court case this week.

Landholders and green group, Friends of the Earth, are challenging the proposed $7 billion open-cut coal mining development by Swiss-owned Xstrata, to be located between Wandoan and Taroom.

The groups believe the mining project should be rejected because of dust, noise, odour, vibration and health impacts on cattle and people as well as concerns over carbon emissions.

Xstrata has repeatedly argued that it has followed a "rigorous" environmental assessment and review process throughout each stage of the mining lease application process in accordance with all legislative requirements.

Xstrata says grazing will continue on the lease areas while mining is under way, with the land retaining 60 per cent of its agricultural productivity during the 30-year life of the mine. The land will be returned to approximately 90pc of its former productivity once mining and rehabilitation is completed.

The Land Court hearing started in Dalby on Friday.

There was not a spare seat in the court room which was packed by more than 10 lawyers lined up representing landholders, DERM, Xstrata and Friends of the Earth as well as witnesses and Xstrata company representatives.

With the case challenging what could become the largest open cut coal mine in the southern hemisphere, there was much as stake, reflected in the often extremely tense atmosphere in the court room.

Wandoan landholder, Pat Devlin, Carmody Downs, told the court his fuel agency business was at risk.

He said Xstrata's proposed redevelopment of roads surrounding his property would increase the time it took for his delivery driver to cart fuel by at least 45 minutes, which would result in the driver missing a carefully planned schedule to comply with the 14-hour maximum work day legislative requirement for truck drivers.

Mr Devlin told the court the proposed Xstrata road closures for mine development would force diversions for the truck which would "blow it right out of the water for time in our log book".

Xstrata objected, claiming that their calculations suggested diversions would only increase the travelling time by about 20 minutes.

"There's a lot of difference calculating time when you're sitting in an office in Brisbane than when you're driving the truck," Mr Devlin responded to laughter from the court.

Mr Devlin said he had been told by Xstrata he could request an escort through their development during the construction phase of the project.

However, Mr Devlin said he should not have to do that.

"I am the son of a soldier settler - why should I go to a foreign-owned company with my cap in my hand and ask to make a wide load through their land?" he said.

Mr Devlin included in his court submission a series of solutions for consideration, including Xstrata upgrading selected roads and bridges to be able to take wide access and 30-tonne loads.

Landholder, Lawrence Peak of Cherwondah, said he had not received a guarantee from Xstrata that he could continue to use a bore on an adjoining property.

Mr Peak's bore had previously been within his property until he gave the patch of country to his neighbour on the condition he could access it during times of need.

The neighbouring property and bore are now owned by Xstrata.

Mr Peak said the bore agreement was done on a handshake between farmers, which he wished was how he could deal with Xstrata "but that is not possible".

Landholder John Bruggemann, Alcheringa, said the lengthy negotiations with Xstrata had been a "nightmare".

He said he was concerned about corrosive fallout and dust on his pasture.

"We had a property in the Dalby area where we used to do oats for fattening and it adjoined a quite dusty road, and our observation there was that up to 100 metres inside of the paddock was covered with dust," he said.

"The cattle never really wanted to eat it - and if they're not eating their feed, they are not getting fat.

"It is weight gain that we're looking for to make money."

The court case is expected to conclude late this week.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Queenslanders should know that Xstrata , and MIM before it, has not delivered on its mine rehabilitation promises before; and definitely should not be believed this time around. Your readers should have a look at the rehabilitation record to see "what runs are on the board". A flight from Blackwater to Collinsville would illustrate my point.
Posted by JIM LEGGATE, 3/09/2011 5:34:33 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Seems like a pretty simple argument, but I fear both Xstrata and the Qld govt still just don't get it. Weight gain is where cattle operations make their money and ANY negative impact on this reduces farm viability.
Posted by RB Auckland, 5/09/2011 12:32:57 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Who cares about the cattle...... we've already seen how our Federal Government treats the landowners in Northern Australia. Sure, its not about mining, but rather undermining, a right to earn income, a right to a way of life, a right to produce Agricultural products.

Who cares how we are going to produce food for the country, just mine it and then leave the country worthless.

Posted by Jeebus, 7/09/2011 11:16:07 AM, on Queensland Country Life

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...