News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 LNP natural resources policy under debate 

LNP natural resources policy under debate

19 Mar, 2009 02:51 PM
A broad brush initiative to develop a genuine partnership between landholders and government is blended with imaginative specific development funding in the LNP Natural Resources and Water policy unveiled this week by Shadow Minister for Natural Resources Andrew Cripps.

He said the policy was based on achieving scientific and environmental objectives, securing property rights, incentives for good management and a genuine partnership between landholders and government.

It also promised to scrap the Queensland Water Commisson to achieve major cost savings.

While Mr Cripps says management of Queensland’s natural resources must be environmentally sustainable in the long term, it also was important to recognise the importance of natural resourcebased industries and ensure they could operate in an economically efficient manner for the benefit of the many Queensland communities that depend on them.

This meant natural resource decision-making should always be based on sound science.

The policy sets specific targets and budgets for dam and water infrastructure upgrades, protection of stock routes, incentives for environmental protection and job creation for the whole community.

Specific resources elements of the policy include:

* $4 million over four years to support landholders affected by vegetation management legislation and to provide environmental incentive payments to landowners pursuing environmental protection measures.

* $2 million for a major study into the future use of Crown land in Queensland to plan for future conservation purposes and economic opportunities in consultation with major stakeholder groups.

* $4 million a year to increase research and extension in the Department of Natural Resources and Water and to enhance the capacity of the department and provide a service focus to stakeholders.

* $2 million over four years to assist up to 1000 rural landholders each year to develop environmentally sustainable land management plans.

* A commitment to protect the future of Queensland’s 72,000km of stock routes, ensuring they remain for the use of travelling stock.

* A review of the tenure application process in an attempt to reduce the bureaucracy involved in the renewal, variation or changes of leases and permits.

* $3.15 million a year for three years to support the development of catchment wide salinity action plans and natural resource management plans.

Specific water policy commitments are:

* $6 million over three years for the ongoing delivery of an enhanced horticulture industry Rural Water Use Efficiency program.

* A position statement confirming the LNP does not intend to roll out the southeast Queensland water model in other regions of Queensland, but will work with local government to achieve improvements in water supplies, while leaving the ownership and control of local water infrastructure and service delivery in the lands of local councils.

The policy also made commitment to restart water infrastructure projects that had stalled under Labor, including:

1. An additional $10 million for the Nathan Dam EIS,

2. $10 million for the Connors River Dam EIS,

3. $10 million for the business cases of the Rookwood Weir and Eden Bann Weir projects and

4. $11 million for the EIS and the design work for the “Water for Bowen” project.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Looking ahead to the next three years, what is shaping as the single biggest issue for the next minister for Natural Resources and Water in your view?
Posted by Queensland Country Life, 19/03/2009 11:59:14 AM

One of the biggest commitments the LNP has made as part of its policy announcement for Natural Resources and Water today is that we will increase research and extension in the department by $4 million a year over four years, and that will be aimed at increasing the capacity of the department as far as technical and extension services are concerned, and that is designed to refocus the department on servicing its clients and stakeholders in Queensland.


Posted by Charles McElhone on 19/03/2009 12:02:42 PM
What do you see as the key points that differentiate the LNP’s policy on Natural Resources and Water to that of the Bligh Government’s policy?
Posted by Queensland Country Life, 19/03/2009 12:04:24 PM
Well one of the major differentials between the NRW policy of the LNP as opposed to the state labor government is that we have taken a decision to invest in a number of water infrastructure projects across Qld, which appear to have stalled as far as their planning is concerned. These include $500,000 for a feasibility study to raise Kinchant Dam, west of Mackay, $2 million for the pre-feasibility of the Urannah Dam north-west of Mackay and $6.6m for the business case for the Nullinga Dam on the Atherton Tableland. These projects appear to have stalled in the forward planning of the state Labor Government, but we’re commited to progressing these projects through the next stages of the process that they are required to go through.

As far as land management issues are concerned, we have announced a commitment in our policy to provide $3.15 million a year for three years to support the development of catchment wide salinity action plans, and natural resources management plans which I envisage will engage important stakeholders from a range of areas across Queensland.

I see catchment wide plans to be the most appropriate basis on which to progress planning for natural resources management.


Posted by Charles McElhone on 19/03/2009 12:11:49 PM
You are giving $4 million over four years to support landholders affected by vegetation management legislation and to provide environmental incentive payments to landowners pursuing environmental protection measures. How will these incentives be paid and to who?
Posted by Queensland Country Life, 19/03/2009 12:13:27 PM
Well look there’s no doubt that the vegetation management legislation introduced by the Beattie Labor Government had a serious impact on landowners in Queensland. It is widely considered that the compensation provided at the time was inadequate. The legislation has been in place for a decade now, and many landowners have worked hard amending their property management plans and the structures of their farm enterprises to deal with the VMA. But the LNP recognizes there is ongoing difficulties and so we’ve made a commitment to provide $4m over four years to continue to help with that adjustment process. My department will consider applications for ongoing assistance for those affected and we will accept applications to provide assistance for those landowners who continue to voluntarily pursue environmentally sustainable land management practices.
Posted by Charles McElhone on 19/03/2009 12:18:25 PM
$4 million over 4 years is a start but very little to right the wrongs of the VM policy implementation. I refer specifically to the Wet Tropics where 1. In 2004 the Regional Ecosystem mapping lacked scientific credibility, 2.there was no impact assessment done (the ABARE study covered dry lands only), 3.land clearing in the 4 years prior to 2004 was minimal, 4. 77% of the land area is locked up, and 5. effectively VM was a slick way of locking up land mapped as essential habitat for endangered species to avoid compensating affected landowners under the Nature Conservation Act. Apart from the $4m, do you envisage as Minister taking other steps to address these inadequacies of the VM implementation and if so, what?
Posted by Cynthia Sabag, 19/03/2009 12:14:09 PM
Good afternoon Mrs Sabag, it is wonderful to hear from one my constituents in the Hinchinbrook electorate. I’m familiar with the circumstances of your situation, and I agree that the vegetation management legislation has had a serious impact on the viability of your property and many other properties involved in horticulture in our area, because of the intensity of our horticultural operations. One of the real problems the LNP has faced preparing policy initiatives for this campaign is the obvious difficult economic and financial circumstances that Queensland presently faces. After 11 years of Labor Government in Queensland, during which they have enjoyed record revenues from the GST, land taxes and stamp duty and royalties from the mining boom, when times have started to get tough the cupboard is bare. With limited resources available, we have given acknowledgement that landowners affected by the VMA still need assistance, and we hope the $4 million the LNP has allocated for this purpose will continue to provide that assistance. It is my intention to explore ways that further assistance can be provided within the parameters that the LNP has set down being that the vegetation management laws will stay in place but not be extended.
Posted by Charles McElhone on 19/03/2009 12:39:22 PM
Why is it Mackay DNR & W Robert sorensen can threaten farmers with masive fines to build sediment traps, then tell them they are not adhering to published best practice when they are and he is quoting CANEMAN as best practice - out of date 10 years. He obviously has no idea of industry best practice!! What are you going to do about educating Mackay DNR & W workers? JED
Posted by JED, 19/03/2009 12:15:31 PM
Obviously I am not aware of the individual circumstances of this particular case, but as I mentioned earlier, the LNP has made a commitment in our natural resources and water policy to provide an increase of $4m a year over four years for research and extension services that are designed to enhance the technical capacity of the department and provide a service focus to stakeholders. If there are inadequacies in the resourcing of departments at a regional level, it would be a priority for me to ensure DNR&W has up to date information and that staff are focused on assisting our clients and stakeholders across Queensland.
Posted by Charles McElhone on 19/03/2009 12:24:15 PM
Are you prepared to investigate the achievements or otherwise of the Vegetation Management policies (in relation to the aims of the Act) involving all landowners affected, since the evaluation carried out under the current Minister looked only at the effectiveness of the Department in communicating the policies (using B4B money)?
Posted by Cynthia Sabag, 19/03/2009 12:26:01 PM
What policies have the LNP announced that will protect the reef from the bad farming practices?
Posted by Gecko, 19/03/2009 12:31:37 PM
The LNP has confirmed its opposition to the Bligh Labor Government’s proposal to increase regulations on farming practices and reiterated its support for the Commonwealth Government’s $200 million voluntary, incentive based Reef Rescue Program to improve land management practices aimed at improving the health of the Great Barrier Reef. A Springborg LNP Government would take the $175 million the Bligh Labor Government has allocated for more bureaucratic regulation and redirect it to innovative, industry led programs that will provide enhanced outcomes by working with farmers, not against them, to achieve best practice. The LNP believes more can be achieved for the long term health of the Great Barrier Reef by Queensland pooling its resources with the Commonwealth, as opposed to creating greater bureaucratic regulation. We are committed to seeing the Great Barrier Reef preserved for future generations, but believe innovation is the key, not regulation. The Bligh Government’s regulation approach was a rushed policy that was announced in an attempt to score quick political points. Labor has been irresponsible and unfair to vilify Queensland farmers. The LNP will not take the same approach.

In fact, a recent study by the Australian Institute of Marine Science found farm run-off could not be blamed for the decline in coral calcification witnessed during their research, because it happened in off-shore parts of the reef that could not be reached by farm run-off. The LNP believe the reef’s future can be better secured by supporting a collaborative approach with the farming community to embrace widespread change. We will position farmers as major partners in the effort to improve the quality of water flowing into the Great Barrier Reef, along with other key stakeholders.


Posted by Charles McElhone on 19/03/2009 12:46:52 PM
Environmentally sustainable land management practices by the departments standard or landholders knowledge of best practice? They are about 10 years apart!
Posted by JED, 19/03/2009 12:33:07 PM
I am someone who has a great deal of confidence in Queensland landowners as the operators of environmentally sustainable farm enterprises in the long term. I believe the overwhelming majority of landowners recognise the benefits of strong environmentally sustainable land management practices on their property. I see a core function of the Department of Natural Resources and Water being the delivery of innovative advice as a result of research by the department to landowners through a strong extension culture. Once again, this is why the LNP has made a significant commitment of $4m a year for four years to improve the technical capacity of staff in the department and give the department a strong service focus to its clients and stakeholders across Queensland.
Posted by Charles McElhone on 19/03/2009 1:34:06 PM
What will you do if you become the minister to ensure that the approach taken by the DNRW towards landholders and farmers, is one of cooperation and genuine partnership and not regulatory and arbitrary.
Posted by Jamo, 19/03/2009 12:33:11 PM
An LNP government’s approach to natural resource management will be based on achieving scientific and environmental objectives, securing property rights, providing incentives for good management and creating a genuine partnership between landowners and Government.

The LNP believes natural resources must be managed on a sustainable basis in the long term. But we recognise policy should also recognise the importance of natural resource based industries to our economy and the communities that they support.

It would be my intention as minister for natural resources and water to provide leadership to the department that creates a service focused culture that respects and engages our clients and stakeholders across Queensland.

As I mentioned earlier we have made a commitment to increasing funding for research and extension in the department by $4 m over four years to enhance the technical capacity of the department and provide a service focus to our clients and stakeholders.


Posted by Charles McElhone on 19/03/2009 12:57:33 PM
Andrew do you have any information about the latest Bligh government plan to lock up regrowth in the same way as they locked up remnant? In 2004 Landholders were assured that a PMAV would gaurantee future use of regrowth and this latest scheme is a total breach of trust.
Posted by Cynthia Sabag, 19/03/2009 12:37:27 PM
Recently premier Bligh released data indicating that as a result of the Vegetation Management Act clearing of remnant vegetation in Queensland had obviously been significantly reduced. At the same time, the data also showed the clearing of regrowth had increased, because under the vegetation management act the clearing of regrowth is permitted. To score political points with the Greens, premier Bligh indicated that her Government intended to introduce new regulations to restrict the clearing of regrowth. This was confirmed recently at the ALP campaign launch in Brisbane. As I mentioned earlier, the LNP policy position is that the vegetation management laws currently in place will remain in place but they will not be extended. The LNP does not intend to ban the clearing of regrowth. I am increasingly concerned that the ALP will do and say anything to appease the Green movement at the expense of regional and rural Queenslanders. Indeed, the Greens have proven they have little credibility on environmental issues after they rolled over on the issue of the Traveston Crossing dam to strike a preference deal with Labor in 14 seats across Queensland to save the Bligh Government.
Posted by Charles McElhone on 19/03/2009 1:06:23 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
LNP natural resources spokesman Andrew Cripps.
LNP natural resources spokesman Andrew Cripps.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
19 March, 2009
18 March, 2009
POLL
Q: If a federal election were held on Saturday, which party would you vote for?

Labor
(16.8%)

Liberal
(40.5%)

Nationals
(25%)

Greens
(8.6%)

Family First
(1.3%)

Independent
(5.9%)

Other
(1.8%)

Total Votes: 1043
Poll Date: 15 March, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...