News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Past Arrow employees speak out 

Past Arrow employees speak out

30 May, 2011 11:02 AM
MEGAN Baker has worked on both sides of the fence with Arrow Energy.

As a former Arrow employee, she helped to build the company as it explored and developed its coal seam gas interests across the Surat Basin. Her husband David left his job as an Arrow Energy senior land coordinator only late last year after 8.5 years' employment.

As a cattle and grain farmer near Dalby, she has experienced first hand the "stalled and difficult negotiation tactics" she feels the company has employed when dealing with property owners.

She said she believed a "culture of secrecy, silence and lack of regard for landholder interests" at Arrow Energy was placing unnecessary strain on landholders.

"There has been a definite culture change as the company has gotten bigger, particularly since multinationals Shell and Petro China have taken over," she said.

"They do not take the time to understand the farmer's core business - they only understand their own objectives.

"The land team work off a scripted piece of paper that dictates what they can and cannot tell the landholder during their dealings with them."

Mr Baker had long-straddled the difficult balancing act of being both a gas company employee and a cattle and grain farmer near Dalby.

He said the balancing act became even more difficult when he became embroiled in his own "ongoing saga" with Arrow in May last year after a gas leak was discovered along the pipeline on the family's 1000-hectare property.

The Baker family currently has nine non-operational wells on their property.

The family's story reaffirms the tales of many landholders in the district.

Mr Baker said he received a phone call from Arrow at 11.30pm one night in May 2010 explaining there was a gas leak into the uncommissioned lines on his property, and requesting the family avoided any company infrastructure until the problem was isolated and repaired.

His father, who lives with a farmhand on a separate cottage at the property, was unable to operate the farm for three days and had to remain at his home, which was less than 100m from Arrow infrastructure.

After being told by Arrow Energy to "pick their own figure" of compensation for the mishap, the family returned with a proposed figure of $9000 a few days later - based on the 'self-imposed criteria' of exclusion from land, lost time and reimbursement for the second employee's wages.

Mr Baker said while Arrow initially refused to pay anything because they claimed there was "no source of ignition" from the leakage, it eventually took more than six months - and complaints to the State Government ? before Arrow agreed to provide compensation.

The Baker family is currently also in ongoing negotiations over annual compensation for the wells on their property. They have been unable to arrange a face to face meeting with Arrow for months.

Arrow vice-president, exploration, Tony Knight, said the company did not think it "appropriate" to be drawn into an argument with past employees, but denied any assertions there had been a negative culture change at the company.

He said the company recognises the support of stakeholders in the overall success of its projects.

Mrs Baker said it was "frustrating" the company did not send decision makers to meet with individual property owners face to face so negotiations could take place.

She said sending countless documents between parties only extended the negotiation timeframe and strain on landholders.

She said the company was not giving farmers the respect they deserve as fellow business owners.

"They could have come in, put the nine wells on our property, done a great job and it would have been a great news story for the company," she said.

"It could have been a great opportunity for the company to win over some of the concerned land holders but Arrow just dropped the ball."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Our politicians have handed our country over to the multinationals. They don't care about you--what makes you think they do? The average Aussie is being bribed with a wage, while the multinationals and politicians get to share the real profits from Australia's resources. What are we left with? Why have so many South American countries nationalized their resources sector? To stop the same multinationals from raping their land for little in return.

It's not the political party of the time that own the resouces, it's the whole country. This government is basically an unpopular one that was unable to sucure a win on their own; but still have to pander to specal interests to stay afloat.

As for the Gas companies and their safe practices (trust them, they say it's safe), they have been run out of Europe, and North America is doing the same, as the social and environmental damages are becoming more clear; no place to run exept for Australia, where it seems the government uses old facts and figures to convince us of what they want, not what is in the best interest of the people.

Do Megan and David Baker believe the resources boom is good for Australia?

Posted by The Source, 31/05/2011 12:51:31 AM, on Queensland Country Life

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Megan and David Baker believe Arrow should improve their negotiation processes with landholders.
Megan and David Baker believe Arrow should improve their negotiation processes with landholders.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...