News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Garrett decision to stop dam lauded as a 'triumph' 

Garrett decision to stop dam lauded as a 'triumph'

12 Nov, 2009 05:32 AM
THE proposed $1.8 billion Traveston Dam in Queensland has been quashed to protect endangered species, including Mary River turtle and cod, after a landmark decision by the Environment Minister, Peter Garrett.

In explaining his decision yesterday Mr Garrett said the dam would have "serious and irreversible effects" on threatened species - which also include the Australian lungfish and the southern barred frog - and he had no option but to reject it.

By stopping the dam, experts said, Mr Garrett had made the biggest decision by an environment minister in 10 years of national environment laws.

"It's clear to me that the Traveston Dam cannot go ahead without unacceptable impacts on matters of national environment significance," Mr Garrett said.

The surprise decision was roundly supported by groups as diverse as the Greens and the National Party. It was also welcomed warmly by residents of the Mary Valley, 160 kilometres north of Brisbane, who have led a three year-campaign against the project.

The dam was proposed by the Queensland Government to provide 70,000 megalitres of drinking water to the fast gowing population of the state's south-east.

It would have meant hundreds of households in Mary Valley would have been displaced and water flowing to the Mary River, and other areas, cut off.

Professor Angela Arthington, from the Australian Rivers Institute at Griffith University, said the decision was a "triumph" for the environment.

Professor Arthington said the dam development would have destroyed the natural habitat of the endangered cod, lungfish and turtle - none of which would have survived in the dam waters.

The Queensland Government has 10 days to make a submission to Mr Garrett in an attempt to change his mind. But the Premier, Anna Bligh, who previously stated Traveston was critical to the sustainability of the state's south-east, said yesterday she had no option but to accept Mr Garrett's decision. Ms Bligh said she would bring forward plans to build up to four desalination plants to combat water shortages in the Gold Coast and Brisbane areas.

An economic analysis by the Centre for International Economics, commissioned by Mr Garrett, found the economic case for the dam was flawed and water could be sourced for the south-east from a range of other projects at the same cost.

Glenda Pickersgill, president of the Save the Mary River campaign, thanked Mr Garrett for what she said was the "right decision".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What a fantastic decision. People power can win if we all stick together. Now all is needed for the ridiculous NSW government to quash the transmission line through the beautiful Northern New England near Tenterfield. It's a complete waste of money and will be obsolete within ten years. Let's all stick together to save our beautiful country.
Posted by High Country Gent, 12/11/2009 6:56:01 AM, on Queensland Country Life
What a relief that common sense prevailed. The Qld Gov't should be ashamed of the environmental & social disaster they were proposing. Desalination plants aren't that great either, due to huge carbon emissions to build & operate. Why isn't Anna Bligh talking about raising Borumba Dam wall? Why isn't more education being done in the urban community so that water is seen as a precious resource to be used more carefully & recycled? ABC Radio this morning quoted Brisbane residents used 230l/day while Toowoomba residents manage on half that at 114l/day. Another big environmental threat is the amount of prime farming land on the Darling Downs being mapped out for coal mining - Felton Valley, Haystack plains, etc. We need people power on this issue too. Qld Labor won't let landholders clear trees but they'll let mining companies destroy the land - what hypocrites. And it's all for the royalties 'cause they're broke!
Posted by Shelly, 13/11/2009 10:01:45 AM, on Queensland Country Life
In 1953 CSIRO produced research that stated that Australia could support a maximum population of 18 million. We are already beyond that with insufficient water. This may be a good decision, but a no dams policy - and that is what current environmental laws amount to - will lead to major unrest in the community especially if we must absorb the world's dross and have 30-40 million over the next few years. I am glad I don't live in a city anymore. I am fed up with such a stupid country that was once great.
Posted by denis, 13/11/2009 11:44:15 AM, on Queensland Country Life
This decision has been a great outcome based on science and economics, and for once not on politics. The decision to dam the Mary River flew in the face of massive public opposition, scientific evidence proving the innapropriateness of environmental counter-measures, economic evidence that the dam is not financially viable, and evidence that the region's water supply can be secured via other means. Dams are no longer necessary in this country - we have the technology to produce water via other means, and to reduce demand for water in the first place.
Posted by Mark, 15/11/2009 7:21:19 PM, on Queensland Country Life

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
An artists impression of what the Traveston Dam may have looked like.
An artists impression of what the Traveston Dam may have looked like.

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...