News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Farmland protection bill a step in the right direction: AgForce 

Farmland protection bill a step in the right direction: AgForce

12 Feb, 2010 10:30 AM
AgForce says the State Government’s move to protect prime cropping areas from mining and urban development is a step in the right direction to secure food production for the future.

President John Cotter said the Government's discussion paper into how to manage key food producing land was encouraging for farmers who have been impacted by mining and gas developments.

“AgForce has long advocated the importance of these iconic agricultural lands and we continue to lead the focus to ensure the security of food production is not undermined by detrimental planning policies such as mining or urban encroachment,” Mr Cotter said.

The discussion paper covers four key area: the definition and mapping of ‘strategic cropping land’; a new statutory planning instrument to guide decisions; possible amendments to resource sector legislation; and guidelines for assessing mining, urban development and other competing land uses.

“A review of resource legislation is a step forward to ensure strategic cropping land is considered in regional development, and is a sign the government has listened to us and is putting security of food supply on the agenda and into the minds of the community.

“Society is facing a global food shortage due to population increases, loss of land, climate change and water scarcity so it is imperative that these highly productive lands are not removed or reduced.”

Mr Cotter welcomed the government’s recognition that cropping land and the industries it supports make a significant contribution to the $22.7 billion agri-food industry and are a key regional employer.

“More than 80 percent of available land across Queensland is under some degree of mining tenure so the removal of the areas classified as strategic cropping land will have little impact to the resources sector.

“The agricultural industry is not asking for mining to be eliminated as we recognise the economic input it has to regional communities. Rather we are seeking security for farming land which, like the resources sector, provides jobs and a significant economic contribution but in addition can feed society forever if sustainably managed.”

AgForce will make a submission to the discussion paper and will work with other sectors of the industry and government to set a framework to identify and provide a level of consistent protection for Queensland's cropping regimes and lands.

Mr Cotter said AgForce expected to see a similar commitment from government to managing development in other key agricultural areas such as the Arcadia Valley and Central Queensland.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What about a move to protect farmland from 'conservation' (from such laws as the VMA) which results in ludicrous outcomes and huge losses for the landowner.
Posted by bushie, 15/02/2010 7:21:31 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Yes, when will farmers be protected from ignorant "planners" and their blunt instruments? Let's not forget that the planning cult have had more than two decades of control over development in SEQ so there is only one place for the blame for the situation we have today. It was they who drove all our sustainable small scale developers out of business with regulatory bull$hit costs that only mega-developers could meet. And it was these large scale developments that handed the entire retail sector to Coles/Myer/Woolworths. The best way to protect farmland from excess concrete is to allow each farm to have a rental house or two. Nothing improves the viability of a near urban farm than a rental cash flow. And a house surrounded by farmland is every renter's dream. Yet, we have these planning boofheads who cannot get it through their tiny brains that a subdivision does not need to have two equal sized blocks with both remaining viable for farming. Indeed, nothing would make intergenerational farm transfer easier than the addition of one or two small house blocks for the non-farming siblings. It leaves the one who carries on farming with a much smaller debt load.
Posted by Ian Mott, 15/02/2010 10:17:13 AM, on Queensland Country Life

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
AgForce president John Cotter.
AgForce president John Cotter.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
11 February, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...