News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Farmers must be engaged in emissions law-making process 

Farmers must be engaged in emissions law-making process

09 Jul, 2009 03:50 PM
DENIAL of the climate change problem will not change our destiny - but a comprehensive energy and climate bill that caps and then reduces carbon emissions will, the US Senate was told yesterday.

US Energy Secretary Steven Chu gave this warning, as he focussed on the threat of climate change.

He said overwhelming scientific evidence shows that carbon dioxide from human activity has increased the atmospheric level of CO2 by roughly 40pc, a level one-third higher than any time in the last 800,000 years.

As the US Climate Change Bill begins to move through the US Senate, the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee was meeting on Tuesday this week, to conduct a hearing on the bill, which earlier passed the US House of Representatives with such a narrow voting margin.

In prepared testimony, US Secretary of Agriculture,Tom Vilsack, said, to produce meaningful emissions reductions an offsets program will likely require the participation of thousands of landowners.

He pointed at the importance in engaging farmers and ranchers in crafting the solution to this critical issue.

US Interior Secretary Ken Salazar told the committee of his department's efforts to accelerate the development of renewable energy on its vast public lands and offshore areas.

Salazar warned, however, that the US cannot fully unleash renewable energy's economic engine unless this committee, and the Senate, put an upper limit on the emissions of heat-trapping gases that are damaging our environment.

Vilsack, Chu, Salazar and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson during their testimony endorsed the Senate's effort to write a climate bill and they backed a USDA lead-role in running a carbon capture program.

Vilsack says agriculture can be a winner - if a carbon capture and credit trading program is done right.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
There is no scientific evidence to say the world is warming. Also there is no scientific evidence to suggest that CO2 emissions are causing any warming.

On the contrary, the world has actually been cooling since 2001.

Politicians and their advisors like Chu are sinking lower in people's eyes. How far can they go?

Posted by Len, 10/07/2009 4:28:29 PM, on Queensland Country Life
The great hoax continues. Convince the people of imminent disaster and they will not notice how governments curtail freedoms now enjoyed by everyone. Just as we can expect another ice age in about 100,000 years in a few thousand the glaciers and Arctic ice will disappear.

The best and only viable Carbon 'sink' is vegetation leading to bogs then coal seams. Ask yourself where the 100 plus metere coal seams in Australia came from.

Posted by jaimie, 11/07/2009 2:46:02 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Mr Chu and the others quoted have again mistaken their own propaganda for overwhelming evidence. The science is not proven, there's mountains of literature to support both sides of the argument, but it's definitely not all science and it's definitely not overwhelmingly convincing from the proponents of the gospel of Gore. Mal Peters was advocating in a recent Land that farmers must engage with Canberra to get the best possible outcome. My contention is that the only outcome from Canberra for farmers will be bad. There is ample incontrovertible proof for this. I say we should take the lesson from some of our European farming cousins and give Canberra cause to listen to us and give us a fair go for once. If we can't claim credit for perrenial pasture and trees, we won't pay tax or fill out more mountains of paperwork.
Posted by bill, 11/07/2009 8:46:39 AM, on Queensland Country Life
The attempted indocrination continues, it's obvious which side the publishers of this newspaper are on. Carbon con.
Posted by lhalf a brain, 12/07/2009 6:08:44 PM, on Queensland Country Life

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Many federal politicians are overseas on trade missions and study tours, during Parliament's winter recess. Is the cost to taxpayers justified?

Yes, the trips are worthwhile.
(26.7%)

No, they're not justified.
(73.3%)

Total Votes: 435
Poll Date: 06 July, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...