News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 CSG question marks 

CSG question marks

09 Dec, 2011 11:36 AM
Some of Queensland's top coal seam gas regulators have played down concerns about inadequate oversight of the state's $50 billion CSG industry but have admitted that knowledge around the full long-term impact on water is far from complete.

"This is an evolving space and certainly our knowledge is evolving," Queensland Water Commissioner Mary Boydell told a gas symposium in Brisbane yesterday.

Complex groundwater flow models are based on "the best information currently available" and understanding of how water moves in aquifers is improving as the gas companies drill more wells, she said. "It is a journey of continuous improvement."

The industry's rapid development in the eastern states has led to mounting concerns about potential damage to the Great Artesian Basin, one of the world's biggest artesian basins that covers the main CSG production area in the Surat Basin.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The CSG industry is just going to have to deal with a period of intensive regulation in order that the GAB is protected and the general farming environment is not polluted out of existence. There is a parellel where farmers were heavilly regulated to prevent unrestricted tree clearing by the Vegetation Management Act. The VMA is an Act which is far from perfect, not even allowing sustainable development of new cropping land. The parallel is that the CSG industry is being allowed unrestricted access to land where ever they want to go. This must be severely regulated to stop the destruction now.
Posted by Trugger, 11/12/2011 4:12:30 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Cont. -Both the LNP and ALP have been reluctant to committ to the full protection of prime cropping and grazing land. This is going to be reflected in the upcoming State election. The Greens, independants and the Australia party are openly advocating restoring property rights so that the land owner is given back the right to say "NO" to mining and CSG on their property. I believe this is as it should be, so if the LNP really are serious about the coming election campaign and primary industry policy, they will be left out on a limb if they don't come to the party and restore our property rights
Posted by Trugger, 11/12/2011 4:21:18 AM, on Queensland Country Life
More bores drilled and evolving knowledge? Who exactly are they kidding?

At Mt Larcom a water monitoring scheme has operated for over 30 years.

The ratio of bores monitored, (over 100) works out at well over a bore or well to each square kilometre.

This didn't stop mine dewatering from becoming entrenched before the COMMUNITY blew the whistle and demanded answers.

Since 1995 there has been approximately 40 hydrology reports but dispute continues over the hydrology and liability of the company.

The Precautionary Principle is the only option!

Posted by Alec, 12/12/2011 8:44:47 AM, on Queensland Country Life

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...