News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Crack force of landholders to tackle Govt, greenies on land clearing 

Crack force of landholders to tackle Govt, greenies on land clearing

20 Apr, 2009 05:38 PM
A NEW group of Queensland landholders has been given the task of not only fighting the State Government's moratorium on clearing of vegetation regrowth but the bigger Green movement's attacks on the State's agricultural sector.

At an AgForce-organised meeting in Rockhampton today, more than 250 landholders voted unanimously for the as yet un-named group - referred to as a "movement" rather than an organisation - to represent all sectors of agriculture and take the fight forward through a special fighting fund of between $10 million and $20 million.

Mt Garnet cattle producer, Greg Brown, who is also an AgForce member and president of the Cattle Council of Australia, put forward a motion for the group to be formed to launch a campaign to "make every citizen of this State aware that this Government is in the process of devaluing and dispossessing landholders in this State".

Led by Central Queensland cattle producer and co-founder of AXM Consulting Peter Mahony, Woolshed, Theodore, the group comprises Michael Hewitt, Fork Lagoon, Emerald; Ian McCamley, Lowesby, Rolleston; Chris Whiteman, Sunlight, Rolleston; Justin MacDonnell, Towrie, Arcadia Valley, and Michelle Horn, Ridgelands.

At today's meeting, Mr Mahony told the crowd they must "attack with a venom unfamiliar to farmers" if they wanted to successfully challenge the greens' push to lock up even more of the State's agricultural land.

At the core of the new group's aims will be to remodel agriculture's image in urban areas and re-educate urban dwellers about Queensland's agricultural industry using a range of approaches including hard scientific evidence.

"There is no positive economic, ecological or environmental benefit in the State Government's moratorium and proposed new laws - it's purely grubby politics," Mr Mahony said.

* More details to come in this week's Queensland Country Life.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
May I humbly suggest that the group first ask the Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy Stephen Robertson to supply the research findings by officers of his Department or other Government Departments to substantiate his statement: "We don't believe that there will be an impact in terms of reducing agricultural production...There's been no suggestion that previous initiatives in terms of reducing land clearing has had a detrimental impact on agricultural production." Let's see what the State's agricultural scientists say about the relationship between vegetation removal and agricultural production.
Posted by Blair Bartholomew, 21/04/2009 5:06:24 AM
Isn't that what Agforce are supposed to be doing?
Posted by bango05, 21/04/2009 6:04:13 AM
Apologies to Dr. Suess "The Lorax".

UNLESS

But now said the landholders, Now that YOU'RE here, The word of the Lorax seems perfectly clear. UNLESS someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to get better, it's not. We too like the Lorax really care for our trees, we nuture the land, down on bended knees. But the knife has sunk deep; they watch as we bleed. Must we now woo the nation that we cloth and feed.

Are we to let the worst Land Manager in the state destory our land, communities and the lifeblood of Australia? Once the heart dies the rest will perish..... and all this as Anna's well-publicised recession looms.

Posted by NJ, 21/04/2009 8:00:22 AM
It’s going to be interesting just how this "movement" is going to tackle an entrenched political system that is “third behind China and Russia” (Rewards for rural landholders who improve State land: Premier Bligh 2007-12-04) when at least some of the participants are sworn and appointed Public Officials, of the Government they now propose to attack!!!! The opening headline containing “landholder” gives the seriousness of the farce away right there; they don’t even see themselves as “landowners” yet they purport to appeal to the urban population to plead for so called “landholder” rights, whatever they may be!!!! I suspect the attack will merely be more words and nothing of significance; after all a serious attempt to uphold property rights generally would most certainly cause the withdrawal of government funding to Agforce and possibly CCA if the “movement” was a serious one!!!!!! Do they really think that the urban group really care; if the point was driven home as it has been in some other countries with a farmers strike, then probably after about 3 months or so, it may be different ... but there’s no chance of that!!!!
Posted by The Serf, 21/04/2009 8:33:26 AM
I suport this groups effort and wish them the best of British, but they are confronting a govt of liars, cheats and pedlers of misinformation, ably supported by an ignorant city media.
Posted by R, 21/04/2009 9:27:09 AM
Yes, perhaps we should follow the lead of some other countries farmers. Vive la France!
Posted by barbara, 21/04/2009 9:49:00 AM
Sorry, that should have been, Vive la Oz!!!!!!
Posted by barb, 21/04/2009 9:53:33 AM
Oh dear, the boys are doing their "can do" swagger again and talking about a $10 million campaign. It will take only 9 cars with loud speakers only half an hour to wake every man, woman, child and dog in Robertson's or Bligh's electorate at 2.00am to give them a clear message that Bligh's idea of "peace, order and good governance" is at serious variance with reality. It will take only 3 truck loads of bull...t (what else would one use) dumped on major arterials in peak hour to remind the people who voted for Bligh that policy based on bogus science is a serious impediment to their own progress. I'll believe it when I see it.
Posted by Ian Mott, 21/04/2009 11:03:15 AM
I hope the Serf's comment is wrong in this case. I can only appauld the intention to fight state legislation that continues to remove common law land rights without landowners' consent. How this situation plays out will be very interesting in view of the complex situation arising in relation to funding of related organisations from government sources. I only hope that those within the new organisation are serious about their intention to fight, and that it is not just a ploy to reverse the trend, where landowners see their interests continually sold out by those whom are supposed to be their representatives. There are already numerous examples of landowners being forced to the brink by the enforcement of Qld statutes. The impact is already being felt and the Qld government denies it!! HA

The new organisation would not have to look far to find some cases to test legally in the Federal and High court if they could find legal representation that would be willing to risk their registration in the fight, in view that the separation of power, we used to have, has gone in Qld and the rest of the Australian States. The Serf is certainly correct, that until farmers take up the matter by striking and demonstrating in Canberra, nothing but a few minor changes are likely to be achieved. It's reached the point where it is easier for the State Governments to create statutes removing the landowners property rights and making land non-productive, when they should just buy the land concerned and return it to the crown and do whatever the Greens want done with THEIR land.

Posted by John Michelmore, 21/04/2009 11:05:33 AM
Anyone who thinks this will just go away, does not know Peter Mahony. It should be an interesting outcome if all property owners get behind this group. Go Peter!!
Posted by interesting, 21/04/2009 11:10:53 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Do you think tree changers generally have realistic expectations of rural life when they move to the bush?

Yes
(9.8%)

No
(89%)

Other
(1.2%)

Total Votes: 764
Poll Date: 19 April, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...