News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Cougar appeals shutdown 

Cougar appeals shutdown

09 Oct, 2011 04:00 AM
COUGAR Energy will appeal the government decision to shut down its controversial Kingaroy underground coal gasification (UCG) trial site.

In a move that disappointed South Burnett landholders, the company filed a notice of appeal in the Queensland Planning and Environment Court last Friday.

In to a notice released by Cougar to the Australian Stock Exchange on Friday, the company stated it had "significant grounds" for appeal against the Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) decision.

Coolabunia producer, Damien O'Sullivan, said landholders did not believe it was fair Cougar had the opportunity to appeal the decision, given locals could not challenge the initial decision to establish the trial site.

"It seems unjust they are given a right to appeal, when we were never given any rights to start off with," he said.

Traces of contaminants, formaldehyde and thiocyanate, were found at a water source at Mr O'Sullivan's property.

It is the third contamination scare at the property, which borders the Cougar trial site, in the past 18 months.

Mr O'Sullivan said DERM was continuing tests at the property, with government officials again finding traces of formaldehyde at the same water source this week, with still no explanation as to the cause of the incident.

Landholders across the South Burnett had welcomed the announcement by DERM on July 7 that no further UCG would be permitted at the project site.

Cougar was told to remove all infrastructure from the site and treat and dispose of any contaminated water in surface storages and clean up groundwater. However, the infrastructure remains at the site.

The department also charged Cougar Energy with breaking the conditions of its environmental approval by contaminating the site and failing to promptly notify authorities.

In a separate matter, the complaint and summons filed by DERM for alleged breaches of the Queensland Environmental Protection Act against the company has been adjourned until December 15.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I would say the chemicals are probably present in the chemicals on the farmers own site and have found their way into the water source.

These chemicals were found in neighbouring bores before cougar touched the earth as part of their baseline measurements for the region.

In summation these chemicals were found in the water before Cougar started any work and over a year after any work by Cougar was halted. The company has never contaminated this man's water bores.

Posted by Michael, 10/10/2011 12:13:20 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Perhaps Michael could tell us of the dates upon which testing took place before the burn started as he seems to be very well informed and the exact readings of these tests. Perhaps he has inside information
Posted by Susie, 10/10/2011 2:04:22 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Michael, how on earth can you substantiate such an allegation? I think it might be best to reveal to this forum who you work for, your motives and why you think an anonymous forum is the right place to stake such a claim.
Posted by RB Auckland, 11/10/2011 8:09:05 AM, on Queensland Country Life
RB of Auckland, I don't believe Michael is the one making wild allegations. Don't you think the farmer's claim that Cougar caused this contamination is the real 'wild allegation?' Just because the farmer detects some chemicals, he immediately blames the 'project next door' - a wild allegation if ever I heard one.

As for substantiation - the chemicals mentioned in this article - formaldehyde and thiocyanate - have nothing to do with coal gasification. Not as process inputs or as products. They have no place or reason to be on Cougar's site.

What are YOUR motives and who do YOU work for??

Posted by Paul, 11/10/2011 6:36:38 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Paul, I am an Agricultural Executive who trades chemical products and just so happens to have a grown up in country Qld and is directly effected by the coal and gas activities.

Thiocyanate is, and I quote, 'one of the major constituents of waste water from factories for the gasification of coal'.

This article spiked my interest because the chemicals do not regularly get found on farms, especially those subject to strict government regulations which happens to be pretty much all farming enterprises. My personal point of adding to this forum is the direct nature of Michael's post.


Posted by RB Auckland, 12/10/2011 11:24:16 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Feel free to respond in kind Paul. Please do once you have tested your 'science' and are informed of farming enterprises, the production inputs and whether with the limited information provided you and others can make definative conclusions.
Posted by RB Auckland, 13/10/2011 7:37:12 AM, on Queensland Country Life

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...