News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Climate breakthrough: cattle carbon neutral 

Climate breakthrough: cattle carbon neutral

19 Nov, 2009 07:50 AM
A NEW report which shows that Queensland's cattle grazing industry is already all but carbon neutral and could provide a solution in addressing the State's overall carbon liability has been buried by the Bligh Government.

It is understood the release of the 30-page report prepared by Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries has been derailed by Greg Withers, the Director-General of the Queensland Government's Department of Climate Change and Premier Anna Bligh's husband.

The report, which examines the carbon footprint of the beef industry and the impact of vegetation clearing bans, has been peer reviewed by a number of the nation's top scientists, including the CSIRO's Dr Ed Charmley, QUT's Dr Peter Grace, and Meat and Livestock Australia's Beverly Henry.

The authors of the report - titled Net Carbon Position of the Queensland Beef Industry - are respected QPIF scientists Dr Steven Bray and Dr Jacqui Wilcocks.

It is not the first time Queensland's Labor Government has denied a report. In 2003, a report prepared by leading government scientist Dr Bill Burrows detailing the negative impact of vegetation thickening was suppressed.

Queensland Country Life was first made aware on November 6 of the existence of the new report by industry sources.

At a meeting on November 9 with Primary Industries Minister Tim Mulherin and his key staff, QCL was advised the report would likely be made available either last week or this week.

However, QCL has subsequently been advised the report will now not be made available.

Instead, the report is now expected to go to Cabinet, meaning the release of the report would not occur until at least next year, long after the Copenhagen conference on climate change, therefore not allowing the ground-breaking information it contains to help shape Queensland's response to the complex climate debate.

It would also give the Bligh Government the right to claim 'Cabinet confidentiality' over the report if it did not suit its political purposes.

The delay of the report has significantly raised anxiety levels within rural industry groups and among a number of key bureaucrats.

Industry groups were moderately confident that a better working relationship had development following the resolution of Anna Bligh controversial election campaign-driven ban on the management of so-called "endangered regrowth".

There had also being been growing hope that the Bligh Government had brought at end to the Beattie Government culture of "bush bashing" following the development and recent release of the incentive-based Delbessie Agreement.

This agreement rewards landholders with increases in lease terms from 30 years to 40 years for demonstrating better land management practices.

The refusal to release the report has also understandably raised concerns among some senior bureaucrats over the level of politicisation of the Bligh Government administration.

"The report shows firstly that the beef cattle grazing industry is next to carbon neutral, at most producing a modest three megatonnes of carbon a year," one source told QCL.

"What we need to do is find the net carbon position position of the industry.

"We know that cattle are emitters of carbon but what what we need to understand is the entire process of emitting and sequestration in the grazing system. Not just the cattle, but also the role soil plays.

"This report concludes that the State owned soils which cover 80 percent of Queensland could be used to sequester carbon, improving degraded C class soils into B class soils and over a 10-year period sequest a massive amount of carbon.

"We know it can be done and the government recognises it can be done. It is the very basis of the Delbessie Agreement.

"We are talking about Queensland being able to significantly reduce its carbon liability as a direct result of the cattle grazing industry."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
All the talk of increased cost due to CPRS, has lost sight of the great oppurtunity farmers now have being excluded and being able to claim credits. And that would be understandable if you don't know how to get these credits. From my experience, not opinion, the credits will far exceed the costs and get this the cost will get less over time. Sounds too good to be true. The catch is you need to change the way you farm now, if you continuously graze paddocks and conventionally farm the future looks bleek. But by moving to rotational grazing or better still cell or time-control grazing and pasture cropping practices you will be come what is now described as carbon farmer, your future will be a win-win. The more carbon you sequence the greater the increase in moisture holding capacity, improving soil structure, increasing fertility, increase biodiversity, leading to decrease inputs, increase in production and therefore increase in profit and thats not counting what you will get from credits. Who would argue agaist something like that?
Posted by Mike, 19/11/2009 8:54:28 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Oh if only the reality was as promising as the fantasy.
Posted by mark2, 19/11/2009 12:11:19 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Cell grazing is just a quick way of eating yourself out. Clean the feed out of 1 paddock then move on to the next and the next and so on then it doesn't rain for a while and by then all the paddocks are bare...GET REAL you gullible people!! Oh that's right you learnt that from uni or out of a book...This is the real world out here... in the paddock, where common sense lives.
Posted by Julie, 20/11/2009 7:24:08 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Mark, you couldn't trust a Labor govt as far a you could throw it. There may well be ways that a farmer could benefit from carbon credits, and most farmers still don't know how to go about this, but I think the whole thing is about new taxing and the last thing a labor govt wants to see, is farmers receiving any sort of gain.
Posted by R, 20/11/2009 8:27:01 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Mike cell grazing is good, if your feed is always growing and you can find a way to keep other animals such as roos out of the paddock. Even when you try to spell a paddock the roos are straight in there and chewing out the butts of the grass and negating the spelling of stock. In some areas of Australia it is simply not a viable option to cell graze. I think it was a wise move to leave ag out for the moment, purely because of the fact there was no talk about how they would calculate the emissions which are taken in. There needs to be more research and information about the ideas getting out and about.
Posted by Bruce, 20/11/2009 9:01:49 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Which farmer, with the exception of our sad mate, Mike, above, would willingly enter into any sort of partnership agreement with such a sleazy lowlife government? If Withers has attempted to supress this highly relevant, and topical, information from the policy process then he has conspired to bring about an improper exercise of power. He has deliberately facilitated a policy process that, without this information, would have pursued a policy that a) knowingly ignored relevant matters and b) knowingly placed undue reliance on irrelevant matters. The legal provisions relating to improper exercise of power under judicial review play a major role in informing on questions of administrative best practise and carrying out official duties with appropriate dilligence, care and attention, as required by the Public Sector Ethics Act 1994. The facts appear capable of establishing a prima facie case that Withers has been in serious breach of his professional duty and guilty of official misconduct. So what, exactly, does the Premier, Mrs Withers, intend to do about it?
Posted by Ian Mott, 20/11/2009 9:32:19 AM, on Queensland Country Life
What is it with these Queensland Labor people ie Bligh, Rudd etc. It's either their way or no way. What right do they have to bury a report such as this, or any report for that matter. Shades of the old style Communism.
Posted by Will, 20/11/2009 10:06:53 AM, on Queensland Country Life
How interesting to learn that Mrs Bligh has her husband in the Department of Climate Change. Does she leave the room when the cabinet is discussing the climate change hoax?
Posted by Len, 20/11/2009 11:09:25 AM, on Queensland Country Life
I am sick and tired of none of the opposing views making mainstream news!!! Who is driving all this and how can it be changed? Just about everyday this paper delivers an article that contradicts the Climate Change scare camp and none of it ever makes a significant impact on mainstream media, anywhere. Is this paper just paying lip service to its loyal reader base or does it really believe what it writes and the overwhelming thoughts of its readers? If so does it have a responsibility to go national and remove all the smoke and mirrors that is everywhere and expose the whole process for what it is. Yep the climate is changing as it has done everyday since our good Lord created our beautiful planet. Lord Monkton has challenged all the popular hypothesis and models and does so from a position of experience, caring for our planet and the people on it. For goodness sake will sombody balance the views and reports that we see daily in our mainstream national media. We have 4 days before Penny and Malcolm break up for Christmas and are supposed to have an ETS agreement through the senate. Put simply Penny, Kevin and Malcolm must put all the cards on the table, who is going to make them?
Posted by Katandra, 20/11/2009 1:54:35 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Funny that. Not a word from our little gang of paid up green pro-government spin meisters. Come on guys, dog ate the homework? Again? What further evidence does Agfarce and all the other appeasers, need? Truth is a casualty, and has been for a very long time. And there is no way this can be passed off as some sort of "collateral damage". The evidence is absolutely clear that the truth has been deliberatel targeted, at the highest (or is that lowest) levels of government. The government is at war. But why, and under what mandate, is this government at war with the farming community? What does it take for all farmers to understand that EVERYONE from government under this administration is an enemy combatant?
Posted by Ian Mott, 20/11/2009 2:32:15 PM, on Queensland Country Life
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Greg Withers and Anna Bligh.
Greg Withers and Anna Bligh.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
18 November, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you believe your farm business can profit from an emissions trading scheme?

Yes
(20.3%)

No
(70.1%)

Undecided
(9.6%)

Total Votes: 606
Poll Date: 15 November, 2009
BLOGS
19 November, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...