News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Abbott vows to overturn Wild Rivers 

Abbott vows to overturn Wild Rivers

12 Jan, 2010 11:36 AM
FEDERAL Opposition Leader Tony Abbott will introduce a private member’s bill to Federal Parliament next month to overturn Queensland's controversial Wild Rivers law, which prevents development along rivers in far north Queensland and Cape York.

But Queensland’s Natural Resources Minister Stephen Robertson has laughed the plan, describing it as a stunt.

Mr Abbott said the legislation discriminates against local Aboriginal people by limiting their ability to make a living.

He has received legal advice that the Commonwealth has the power to override it.

"A national government which fails to become involved in a serious problem of a state government’s making, where it has ample capacity to do so, becomes complicit in the original error," Mr Abbott said.

"Where the Commonwealth has the constitutional authority, intervention is possible. Where a state’s failure is sufficiently grave or far reaching, intervention arguably becomes necessary."

Mr Abbott argues that apart from education, "economic development is the key to real progress for Aboriginal people".

"The Queensland Government says that it supports a better life for Aboriginal people but it has effectively locked them out of their land by making economic development on Cape York almost prohibitive through over regulation and red tape," he said.

"Very few Cape York people or organisations have the tens of thousands of dollars needed to penetrate this legislative and regulatory jungle.

"The Queensland Government has made Wild Rivers declarations for Cape York despite the opposition of most local indigenous people."

But Mr Robertson immediately dismissed the Federal Liberal’s challenge as a stunt.

"This is typical of Tony Abbott," Mr Robertson said.

"[It is] an overreaction to a complex issue and one that, whilst he might play it out as some sort of stunt in Federal Parliament, I suspect [it] won’t change a thing in terms of the ongoing campaign by some individuals against our Wild Rivers legislation."

The Queensland Government passed the Wild Rivers Act in 2005 and it has since undergone several amendments.

On its website, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources defines the purpose of the laws is "to preserve the natural values of rivers that have not been significantly affected by development and thus have all, or almost all, of their natural values intact.

"It does this by regulating development within a declared wild river and its catchment area, and by regulating the taking of natural resources from the area."

The laws have caused deep divisions within the community and last year saw the resignation of indigenous leader Noel Pearson as director of north Queensland’s Cape York Institute.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1



comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Any legislation that prescribes one set of rules for the "haves" in SE Qld and another far more restrictive set of rules for the "have-nots" living elsewhere without the support of those "have-nots" is bad legislation. Why would you bother quoting what Robertson said because he has been an abject failure as a Minister in every portfolio he's been tried in.
Posted by Bob, 13/01/2010 6:55:14 AM
So Robertson says Wild Rivers is a complex issue. But the result for landowners is simple: loss of land use rights. This is just the same as the draconian Vegetation Management Act: a complex issue resulting in a simple result for landowners: loss of landuse rights without compensation. Tony Abbott needs to go the whole way and overturn vegetation management laws or alternatively compensate landowners, especially since the Feds have gained carbon credits at the expenses of the landowners.
Posted by bushie, 13/01/2010 7:20:37 AM
Thank god, someone to intervene and stop the blanket ban on everything by the Bligh government, except of course, govt spending and overseas trips for labor ministers.
Posted by Amused, 13/01/2010 7:36:31 AM
What they really need is their own state within the commonwealth. It is the only way to properly protect their children's future from metropolitan malgovernance and incompetence. More than 3 times the population of NT and more than double that of ACT, this is an idea whose time has come. Lets see Noel Pearson as the first Premier (of any state). Lets put the full definition of "proper exercise of power" in the new state constitution, and link it directly to just compensation and set an example for the rest of Australia. And then get ready for an investment and population boom as folk from all over the country, who are sick to death of the scum who govern us now, vote with their feet and their cheque book.
Posted by Ian Mott, 13/01/2010 9:56:46 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Pro-Tech
 
Metromax
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
photo gallery
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL Twitter
 
QCL Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...