News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Timmmmbeeerr…corp facing the axe 

Timmmmbeeerr…corp facing the axe

22 Apr, 2009 04:06 PM
Saddled with huge debt at a time of world financial crisis, devoid of new MIS products to raise new capital, and faced with the toughest market conditions for asset sales, Timbercorp is now facing insolvency.

In February Rural Press reported that the future of a number of timber MIS companies was shrouded with uncertainty as they looked to sell more assets to stay afloat.

Now Timbercorp is right up against a financial deadline, needing to find a $20.5 million interest and principal loan repayment before next Friday.

According to the company, unless it is able to "reach agreement with its financiers to restructure the existing debt facilities, or an alternative funding or restructure plan is implemented before 1 May 2009, there is significant uncertainty regarding the ability of the company to continue as a going concern".

Lonsecs' head of agribusiness, Jim Blackburn, has studied the timber MIS sector in detail and said that the outcome of not meeting debt obligations would be determined by the finance providers (banks) and what security they have obtained from Timbercorp for these loans.

"At the moment Timbercorp have a pipeline of assets they are looking to sell to fund debt repayments, however if this does not eventuate, the finance providers have a number of options to consider including extension provisions or closing out on the loan security," he said.

Mr Blackburn said one advantage for Timbercorp, if there was one, was the current limitations on the supply of high quality, high rainfall forestry land.

"The Timbercorp forestry assets contain some very productive land and would provide signficant immediate economies of scale to buyers with the resources to negotiate a deal," he said.

About 500,000 hectares of blue gums have been planted across Southern Australia, with the majority being planted as part of a forestry MIS, with Timbercorp and Great Southern the two of the largest five players.

Great Southern is reported to be the largest landholder in Australia when its forestry, horticulture and cattle land assets are combined.

Mr Blackburn said he had examined its business in depth and as it stood Lonsec was satisfied with the quantum of assets available for sale relative to the debt repayment requirements.

Overall, Mr Blackburn said the MIS model these two main companies were founded on has needed to change.

"We are seeing the unwinding and restructure of an MIS model which is unsustainable.

"Under the structure set up 10 years ago, these companies were just too reliant on upfront revenue from MIS sales and did not generate enough revenue from their ongoing operations."

Another significant factor which has not helped the sector, according to Mr Blackburn, has been the many and ongoing changes to tax laws affecting MIS.

A spokesperson for the assistant treasurer said the previous Government introduced specific tax deductions, in legislation, for forestry MIS and there was no proposal to change this at this time.

"In line with the Government's election commitment, a review has been conducted into non-forestry MIS and the Government understands certain agricultural group's concerns with non-forestry MIS. This review will be released shortly."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
In other words, the whole MIS thing is a government-supported pyramid scheme. It is built on some people's preference to sending their money down the gurgler rather than paying it in tax. Not that this is news, but apparently not everyone was aware of this.
Posted by not surprised, 23/04/2009 3:31:01 PM
Re valuation of land in financial statements (30/9/2008) of mis tree farming companies. My recollection is that in calculating land values one of the public companies financial statements estimates costs of remediating the land at $750.00 per hectare in 2008 which is significantly below the quotation of sam paton referred to of $3,200/ha some 2 years ago in the above article. And it was signed off by accounts auditor.
Posted by mikes, 25/04/2009 1:09:25 AM
I'm not surprised, Mike. It goes like this doesn't it? From the MIS perspective, of course! Over value the land. Over estimate the cost of establishment. Overestimate the yield. Underestimate the annual costs. Underestimate the cost of harvest and transport to port. Underestimate the cost of re-clearing. Over charge the investor. Wreck the local road infrastructure. Upset the locals. Forget about the second crop and perhaps no one will notice, especially the investors. If you are an executive, especially a founder, sell out! Take the Smarties and run! It was an Arthur Daly saying, I think: "For you, my boy, I've got a special deal."
Posted by Roger Crook, 1/05/2009 7:41:24 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
22 April, 2009
20 April, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you think tree changers generally have realistic expectations of rural life when they move to the bush?

Yes
(9.8%)

No
(89%)

Other
(1.2%)

Total Votes: 764
Poll Date: 19 April, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...