News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Outrage at Cougar gas water contamination 

Outrage at Cougar gas water contamination

16 Jul, 2010 01:29 PM
The contamination of underground water in Cougar Energy’s pilot underground coal gasification plant near Kingaroy is threatening the livelihood of local farmers and justifies farmers' concerns about the environmental impacts of mining on agricultural land.

The Department of Environment and Resource Management has today ordered Cougar Energy to close the plant after test bores detected benzene and toluene in the groundwater.

AgForce, the Queensland Farmers' Federation and the Basin Sustainability Alliance have all responded angrily to the news of the contamination.

AgForce mining spokesman Drew Wagner said water quality tests taken on 29 June detected benzene and toluene in groundwater monitoring bores close to the plant.

"Carcinogenic chemicals have been found in Cougar Energy’s monitoring bores and rural property owners within a two kilometre radius of the UCG plant and two kilometres of Plantation bore are being advised not to use water from their bores for human consumption or stock watering until further testing is done," Mr Wagner said.

"Although the underground coal gasification process differs from the production of coal seam gas, it raises serious concerns about the lack of knowledge both the government and the resource industry have about the impact of mining practices on groundwater resources."

QFF chief executive Dan Galligan said the "underground water supply must be protected at all costs when underground gas is being extracted".

"The aquifer is a vital economic and environmental resource – and all sectors of the community deserve assurance that it is not being polluted," Mr Galligan said.

"The checks and balances must be in place. The resource is simply too valuable to put at risk with experiments."

Basin Sustainability Alliance chair Ian Hayllor said the forced shut down of the Cougar Energy plant was a prime example of the need to ensure the science is right before steaming ahead with the coal seam gas and LNG industries in Queensland.

"I am very concerned that the federal opposition is not supporting Mr Garrett’s request for a three-month delay to conduct additional investigations," Mr Hayllor said.

"Three months is not a long time to hold up projects when we are talking about environmental impacts that could last a lifetime."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
... and we're meant to sit by and let these companies devastate the landscape whilst it's obvious the regulator is asleep at the wheel? Apparently the DERM officer has been 'stood down' ... how about his/her boss as well? That department needs a big kick up the behind and some changes at the top to start making them responsible for managing our water properly.
Posted by Morgan, 16/07/2010 3:23:27 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Where are the federal oposition on this issue?
Posted by qld mum, 16/07/2010 5:08:47 PM, on Queensland Country Life
It's DERM. Don't be surprised. Their name reflects some of their staff's attitude. Re DERM Leadership should be given down, not having staff without any serious skillset aspiring to be managers.
Posted by George, 16/07/2010 6:15:23 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Tony Abbott has demonstrated that he is afraid to stand up to the mining sector, he is pure chicken where they are concerned. But then, we have just witnessed a Prime Minister removed by the mining industry. After all, what was Julia Gillard's first undertaking as PM, appease the mining companies. We need a moratorium on all this drilling in, and through the aquifers until the companies have shown that they can quickly and permanently repair this mess. Then we need to dismantle DERM and create an independent and well funded EPA that monitors all such activities. In the mean time all the test wells the CSG companies have drilled in as yet unapproved leases. As they are required to do. And don't let any of their executives of managers leave the country.
Posted by Graeme Henderson, 16/07/2010 6:48:53 PM, on Queensland Country Life
What we are seeing here is the thin end of the wedge. There is going to be much more destruction of prime farm land if coal seam gas projects are allowed to go ahead on the gas companies' terms. The Wyoming gas fields in the good ole USA are an example of what to expect. See the Sky truth submission to the US government at; http://www.skytruth.org/pdfiles/Amos%20testimony%2017sep03.pdf and the main Sky Truth website at; http://www.skytruth.org/. When these gas fields were first developed, the gas company claimed they would only need to put one gas well per 80 acres. Now they have convinced the government to allow them to have one well per 16 acres. The pad where each gas well is covers around 4 to 5 acres. Transpose these figures to the Darling Downs and there will be no way it can be farmed any more. I see no reason why our government would be any different to that of the US as both our State and Federal governments are hungry for the tax revenue that can be generated from this. The Sky Truth website has published LandSat pictures showing the development of the same 7 mile X 7 mile section of the gas field. The pictures speak for themselves.
Posted by Trugger, 17/07/2010 6:52:42 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Very disappointing to see the response from the Qld LNP on this issue - JP Langbroek has sided with the industry and not with the Kingaroy community. It's a real shame he's not prepared to stand up for his constituency. http://bit.ly/9OOzN9
Posted by John Mackenzie, 17/07/2010 5:54:04 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Agree with the views, however, this is an incident that can be controlled/contained and does not be a reflection on the coal seam gas industry. My key concern is that both Qld and federal environmental legislation does not go far enough to require CSG companies to remove the millions of tonnes of salt brought to surface by gas production and completely remove it from the hydrological cycle. This way discharge will be zero and the risks imposed on the community and the government (because of lack of knowledge of salt pollution consequences) will be largely removed. There are technologies around for salt extraction and a quick search (just Google ‘saline effluent management solutions’) shows that there is an Aussie company called Geo-Processors Pty Ltd based in Sydney offering smart salinity solutions right for this purpose. Australia has been experiencing salinity problems for a long time now, and there is a long legacy of heroic fight against salinity in this country. But experience has clearly indicated that the so-called engineering solutions can not tackle this problem of dislocation of salt from deep formations expecting that pristine landscape can tolerate it.
Posted by Concerned QLD citizen, 18/07/2010 4:34:51 PM, on Queensland Country Life
So we ought to ensure the solutions involve salt extraction and lead to zero discharge. Let’s not make the mistakes that our nations have made in the recent past, and that other cultures have made long time ago, because the lesson there is simple and brutal. The community and the politicians, regardless of their political ideology should be united and active in this effort.
Posted by Concerned QLD citizen, 18/07/2010 4:35:47 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Paragraph six of this article sums up the situation succintly. To state that there is a lack of knowledge in the government is fair enough! The question that concerns me is "Do the really care?"
Posted by mrs e, 19/07/2010 5:16:34 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Underground Coal Gasification is a completely different process to the CSG process. It is less invasive, takes up less area/land, does not have the massive water extraction of CSG, extracts up to 75% more energy from the coal seam than CSG, trial burns have been carried out in Australia for a net 20 years without incident, it burns coal underground which is too deep or poor quality for extraction, a UCG fired power station releases up to 60% less CO2 than conventional coal fired power stations and it is being trialled in 26 other countries. The current 'scare' campaign is based on a federal election to get the green vote. People understandably have a right to be concerned that groundwater supplies are not contaminated. The fact is that they haven't. The DERM has stated that the level of benzene detected was at the limit of detection and is what one could expect to find in the environment anyway. If people are concerned about benzene at 0.7 ppb (which is within drinking water guidelines) they will never drink coke or other soft drinks which have levels up to 18 ppb. Or fill up at a petrol station (600 ppb in the air). People are being treated like lemmings, and acting the same.
Posted by The Facts, 29/07/2010 8:52:12 AM, on Queensland Country Life

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...