News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Bligh considers end to Qld fuel subsidy 

Bligh considers end to Qld fuel subsidy

18 May, 2009 01:53 PM
The State Government is considering scrapping the 8c/l fuel subsidy in a bid to plug a massive black hole in this year's budget.

Premeir Anna Bligh yesterday told the media that the option was being actively considered by her Government, despite ruling out such an option just last year.

Ms Bligh says funds are needed to keep the Government's massive infrastructure program on track, thus protecting jobs and the economy.

Scrapping the subsidy would save the government $600 million a year.

"In this year's budget I will do what I said I would do in the election campaign - I will prioritise jobs and protect our building program," she said.

"To do that we've got to look at some pretty tough decisions - and right now everything is on the table."

However, the fuel subsidy, which puts Queensland motorists and businesses at an advantage compared to those south of the border, has long been viewed an economic stimulus in its own right, helping to lure businesses under the guise of Queensland being a "low-tax state".

The idea of scrapping the subsidy has been bagged by industry groups, including AgForce, which says rural residents will be hit particularly hard.

"Rural and regional Queenslanders are impacted by any effect on the transport sector because everything must be freighted in and out," AgForce president John Cotter said.

"Regional communities are already paying significantly higher prices at the fuel pump, so the 8c/l translates into another impost which increases down the supply chain.

"The downstream multiplier effect of 4-to-1 means increased input costs on small businesses which are a significant employer in rural and regional areas, so jobs will be threatened at a time of financial uncertainty."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Anna Blight must have something like around fifty advisers all competing on who will come up with the best ideas on how to ruin the rural industries!
Posted by Trugger, 18/05/2009 5:58:01 PM
"Scrapping the subsidy would save the government $600 million a year." It is going to cost rural industries a damn site more with the multiplier effect taken into account. It might be alright for the city slicker because he can cut down on his fuel use by catching a train or buss. I don't think Anna Blight is going to provide a bus service for rural property ownere and their workers. And Ms Blight has the temerity to ask us to believe that this measure is going to save jobs. What a load of old codswallop. We have been disempowered politically for the last 10 years or more and it is getting worse each year we have these turkeys in George St. When food prices skyrocket, just watch the city slickers scream.
Posted by Trugger, 18/05/2009 6:07:11 PM
What about the impact on farmers of fruit and vegetables! Returns for these farmers from the central markets in the cities are determined by supply and demand and what the big supermarkets are prepared to pay, regardless of the producers' costs. So a jump in fuel prices means an increase in transport costs which are passed on to the producers with absolutely no opportunity to recoup the cost. This, combined with fertilizer cost increases and electricity makes farming for food crops a risky business for family farms. Yet another step towards the destruction of the Aussie family farms and total reliance on imports from third world countries where regulations on chemical use and residue levels are sketchy at best or non-existent. But do the Australian governments care about the food, its safety and source consumed by the general public of this country? I think not!
Posted by green landowner, 19/05/2009 5:28:33 AM
Funny about the fuel subsidy being scrapped - it only came about because other states (NSW, VIC etc.) had a state fuel tax and QLD didn't. Some court ruled those states couldn't impose a fuel tax, so the federal government took it over on behalf of those states, made it national and had to reimburse QLD for collecting the tax which was passed back to the motorist. So what premier Bligh is proposing isn't a scrapping of a subsidy, but imposing a NEW tax on Queenslanders that we never had in the first place.
Posted by gordons49, 19/05/2009 12:02:29 PM
I swear the average IQ of a Labor voter must be below 100! Labor = INCOMPETENCE. The last non Labor Government elected in Queensland did more in their short term than these guys have done in years! I simply cannot understand how they get re-elected given their track record. The incompetence of Labor shows Nation wide in all State Governments, with not a dollar to show for it after more than a decade of economic growth. Their waste and practices in Government are inexcusable. Beattie resigned because his rug was getting too tall to stand on and Labor ministers are wasting tax dollars everywhere. The scrapping of the subsidy will certainly be the end of any hope of sustaining economic activity in the State. Heed what Churchill said; "socialism is the equal sharing of misery." Look at the facts for once, not the PR crap!
Posted by V, 3/06/2009 3:08:00 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...