News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 WoolProducers back the AWI board 

WoolProducers back the AWI board

8/10/2008 2:00:00 PM
WoolProducers has urged growers to support the present board of Australian Wool Innovation by directing proxy votes to chairman Brian van Rooyen.

He is expected to support his board members Chris Abell and Ken Boundy, John Keniry and Robyn Clubb.

The last three were independently appointed to the board earlier this year after it was decided to expand the board to nine members.

If topmaker Laurence Modiano decides to run, he will join Meredith Sheil, Will Roberts, David Webster and George Falkiner in contesting the available seats.

With the national flock at an 85-year low, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, and wool production at similar ebb, vision for the future of wool and the skills offered by individuals are expected to be issues to be voted on.

In a recent letter to members, WoolProducers Australia states it is particularly concerned with certain directors who are "unable to give their support to the chair".

WPA executive director Greg Weller adds "the choice for shareholders will be a simple one".

"To support moving our industry company further towards a mature, professional business with independent directors, which promotes our fibre to the world and delivers on farm innovation."

Countering this is the Australian Wool Growers Association, which has placed its support behind the five alternate candidates based on what it says is the poor management of the present board over an extended period of time.

"Brian van Rooyen and Chris Abell have been at AWI for some six years and have achieved very little for woolgrowers. They have been distracted from the main game of demand creation by their mishandling of mulesing and now the mulesing alternatives they seem desperate to create," president Martin Oppenheimer said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The major distraction of the AWI Board majority has been the political shenanigans of AWGA and its allied directors. Doesn't this noisy minority clique (AWGA) want the industry to find an alternative to mulesing??? Surely they are not getting their own commercial interests confused with the genuine interests of the wider industry.
Posted by Dick on 8/10/2008 4:38:53 PM
Why won't the AWGA candidates answer the very simple questions asked by Mr van Rooyen months ago? Why won't the AWGA candidates explain what their policies are? To date, there have been none. Will the AWGA candidates explain their involvement in the Bill Heffernan-inspired senate hearings into AWI this October? Have any current AWGA AWI directors been involved in meetings or discussions with Bill Heffernan about senate hearings? Were further board confidences breached at these metings? AWGA have a lot of explaining to do - why won't they answer questions? Makes you wonder what their agenda realy is.
Posted by Sir George on 8/10/2008 8:54:20 PM
It astounds me that once again WoolProducers seems to be providing unconditional support for the 'status-quo' at AWI. Yes, some things have changed, but the organisation is still being run by the same people that have totally failed to deliver any returns on wool tax payer levies for years. We have no productivity gains, a mulesing mess and the value of the industry is shrinking faster than ever.
Posted by Fred on 9/10/2008 5:34:29 AM
I would like Woolproducers and AWGA to publically declare what income they and or any of thier directors and or afffiliates have received from AWI over the past 6 years. This will allow shareholders to see if they act from a positon of integrity or self interest.
Posted by interested on 9/10/2008 6:47:54 AM
Fair enough to issue a statement of support for the retiring AWI Board members but why quote the AWGA's criticism without a vigorous rebuttal, if that's how they feel. While I support WoolProducers' stance I wonder to what extent if any its membership has been canvassed as to where they stand on these issues. Moreover a statement of this nature should really emanate from the elected President at least, not the paid secretariat. The issues and outcomes at stake are serious for the industry's future. It would seem appropriate that all candidates for election be required by AWI to prepare statements as to their stance on AWI issues and their qualifications for election.
Posted by observer on 9/10/2008 8:12:36 AM
WoolProducers have over the years been steadfast supporters of the management which has just about wiped wool out. The management which this week saw Thylungra switch to cattle. The management which saw this week's news reporting the dispersal of the Steam Plains flock. A board which ran like rabbits when PETA turned a spotlight on us. A board which made the terrible error of launching a lawsuit against PETA with no more case than bluster to support it. A lawsuit which gave our sworn enemies a seat in the management of our industry. A lawsuit which will yet come back to cost us dearly. A board which has demonstrated that it has a very poor understanding of the most fundamental principles of marketing. Furthermore it should be remembered that WoolProducers last year opposed the election of Roger Fletcher to the board of AWI because he was not a toady. Roger Fletcher virtually single handedly saved our sheep industry from total destruction in the early 1990s by maintaining and developing a market for mutton when nobody else was interested. WoolProducers evidently can't remember back that far. During the nigh on ten years that Brian van Rooyen, Chris Abell and John Keniry have been key players in the management of the wool industry wool has been close to wiped out. That WoolProducers does not understand the significance of this is very strange.
Posted by Ted O'Brien on 11/10/2008 9:21:05 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Do you have confidence in the Rudd Government's ability to guide Australia through the current turbulent economic conditions?

Yes
(18.5%)

No
(74.6%)

Undecided
(6.9%)

Total Votes: 826
Poll Date: 5/10/2008

13/11/2008 | Cattle are getting a bad rap these days, so it's refreshing to see Britain's venerable National Trust getting into the business of "conservation cows".
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...