News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 AWI election term extension ignoring key problems: WPA 

AWI election term extension ignoring key problems: WPA

05 Nov, 2009 07:20 PM
WOOLPRODUCERS executive director Greg Weller has warned that proposed changes to double Australian Wool Innovation’s director terms to six years put forward by AWI this week will not solve the organisation's problems and "blatantly ignores" the recommendations to fix its governance as stated in its performance review.

While welcoming the attempts to minimise the annual election distraction, Mr Weller said simply switching to having an election every two years did not address the issues that were causing the distractions and political infighting.

"Other bodies such as Meat and Livestock Australia can hold election processes without them distracting from core business - why can't AWI?" he told Rural Press this week.

"AWI should address the underlying root causes of its problems rather than sweeping them under the table."

Mr Weller urged AWI to disclose its director salary as it had in previous annual reviews.

"We know from past annual reports that Mr McLachlan received $140,000 annual salary. If the length of term was doubled a chairman on this rate would get over $800,000."

The release of the amendment of constitution to change the selection of directors by rotation to every two years, rather than one, will be voted at the AWI annual general meeting November 27 in Sydney.

AWI’s chairman Wal Merriman said this week: "Such a change would reduce the annual distraction of these elections and allow the board to focus on the business of wool."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It would reduce costs.
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 6/11/2009 5:12:19 AM
Growers should be very wary about this proposed constitutional change. It means that it might take 6 years to vote out an unwanted director. The current 3 years is bad enough. If you want to extend to 6 years, go the whole way and introduce a skills-based board. Without naming names, I would despair if some of the current directors were to remain for another 6 years. No real progress to show since being elected last year and now wanting to lock in a 6 year term?
Posted by fact not fiction, 6/11/2009 5:53:28 AM
Best thing to do Wally is to not have elections at all. It's the only way to stop these pesky growers from interfering in your grand plan... Ted, Martin and Co could call you 'Dear Leader" - you'd be the Kim Jong Il of Australian Wool Growers!!!
Posted by Sir George, 6/11/2009 8:26:31 AM
The best thing that WoolProducers can do is just close down all together. They are a negative bunch of socialists with no support and no membership...they are a weeping sore on the backside of this industry.
Posted by jim hawkins, 7/11/2009 6:57:15 AM
Executive structure chaps, that’s what we want, that way average wool producers, the rats and mice, the riff raff wouldn’t have a say in their industry, they would just have to accept what our wise leadership, our masters, the lords of knowledge want.
Posted by the squattocracy, 7/11/2009 2:59:43 PM
AWI are damned by the independent Arche report. They are damned by an intelligent Senator with the guts to go against the stud breeder establishment. They are damned by their own annual report that shows costs are higher now than under the previous board (even though they have been spinning it otherwise). The company is now a play thing for bored rich kids and vested interests on the board. All work has stopped - the staff that are left are completely demoralised and have board directors dragging them in different dierctions to do their bidding. There is no leadership. Maybe not Kim Jong Il...maybe more like Sun Myung Moon - the leader of the Moonies...Wally Moon...yep that's it!
Posted by Sir George, 8/11/2009 8:47:54 PM
The arrogance of these AWI directors beggars belief! AWI is an organisation that has delivered precisely nothing to the wool industry since its inception and done untold damage to wool's future by dismantling R&D. If woolgrowers vote for AWI's continued existence and an even larger comfort zone for directors, then they need sectioning under the mental health act.
Posted by Dinosaur, 9/11/2009 2:57:23 PM
What happened to transparency and accountability Wally? The Annual Report does neither of these......Pffft.....Poor growers another political clown taking them for a ride! Wally et al, show and tell the growers why you should stay on board longer than needed.
Posted by Farming Princess, 9/11/2009 8:13:26 PM
How embarrassing for these negative bloggers. Democracy has won the day, and the rank and file woolgrower has made a clear choice with a majority voting 2%. Marketing and selling of Aussie wool is finally going to happen after ten years of neglect.
Posted by jim hawkins, 12/11/2009 12:06:29 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
04 November, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the Nationals and Liberals dissolve the Federal Coalition?

Yes
(47.1%)

No
(46%)

Undecided
(6.8%)

Total Votes: 526
Poll Date: 01 November, 2009

Most popular articles




Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...