THE retreat of the wool industry’s biggest credit export insurers, QBE, has raised alarm bells that wool could be more difficult to sell this year.
The months after the European fashion and trade events are typically the industry’s busiest as European buyers place their orders for Australian wool in time for the winter retail market.
But it may be harder to sell wool this year with the retreat of QBE Insurance from the sector and the continual rise in the cost of credit risk insurance from remaining insurers scaring potential buyers.
The international insurance and reinsurance group - rated one of the top 25 in the world - told policy holders in the wool, leather, construction and various textile exporting industries in May this year that because of risk it would not be renewing any policies from July 1.
“This has made business harder,” said one source within the Australian export sector.
“I don’t think there is anyone who does not think it won’t make trade difficult…..some business probably won’t occur because of it.”
Exporters such as Fox and Lillie, Elders and New England Wool have gone on the front foot, tying up credit insurance with the few remaining insurers – largely Coface and Atradius - and are negotiating with European clients about different terms of payments.
But Rural Press understands that its premiums have been increasing.
Fox and Lillie managing director Jamie Lillie said Europe accounted for between 25-30 per cent of its client market.
“It (the removal of credit insurance) will have an affect and no doubt decrease (wool) volume into Europe,” he said.
“But that affect won’t be across the board - there are plenty of good companies in Europe that can be supplied too. We still have insurance and the orders are going.”
Mr Lillie said the European 120-day pay turnaround meant Australian exporters were forced to finance wool for almost half a year – and insurers were exposed to this long risk.
In China, which buys the bulk of Australian wool, buyers operated on letters of credit and were not vulnerable to changes in credit insurance.
“It is easy to say gee they (QBE) are tough and they are unfair, but in reality a number of the smaller clients in Europe are operating on little capital, losing money and they are expecting insurance.”
He said Fox & Lillie had anticipated a tightening in credit insurance eight years ago and had moved to two insurance companies (including QBE) and were able to continue offering credit insurance after the QBE July 1 cut off.
“This is going to flush a few of the poor clients out and could be good solution; we have long been saying it is silly that we exporters have to basically finance some of our clients for half a year.
“These less financially robust companies are going to have to learn that they have to get cash into their businesses.”
Elder’s International wool manager John Roberts said Elders relied on credit insurance to be able to fund European buyers in the past but is convinced the retreat by QBE would eventually create a more transparent industry.
“While detrimental for business in the short term, for the overall industry it is not a bad thing,” Mr Roberts said,
“Parties will have to get their finances in order and this is going to make it much cleaner and healthier to do business.”
But New England Wool managing director Andrew Blanch said any potential loss of business from Europe would reduce competition in the wool market.
“Europe is really the only competitor to China,” he said,
“It is important there is pressure in the market.”
QBE declined to comment.
CORRECTION: In an earlier version of this story (on 08/07/09), insurance firm Atradius managing director David Huey was incorrectly described as the managing director of QBE. It was a sub-editing error, not that of the writer.