At issue is the failed move to change AWB Ltd’s constitution as a result of a vote that saw 74.7 percent of shareholders vote to reform the troubled wheat marketer, thereby falling 0.3pc short of a required 75pc majority target.

As a result, they extended the voting by two weeks and adjourned the meeting to reconvene in Melbourne on September 3.

AgForce Grains policy director Lindsay Krieg says AgForce Grains current series of Queensland meeting aren't focusing on the AWB saga, preferring to concentrate on how the new deregulated wheat marketing system will impact on growers, but there’s no doubt the company’s bid to do away with its dual class share system remains a top-of-mind issue.

“There’s a lot of complacency out there,” Mr Krieg cautioned.

While 90pc of Queensland growers look to be in favour of the reform process, the reality is that only 25pc voted – an outcome broadly mirrored in other states.

Meanwhile, AgForce says it supports moves to change AWB Ltd’s constitution because, for instance, of the difficulty in raising capital to buy wheat in today’s volatile world market trading conditions.

“If there’s anything a little bit strange about your company, then those big hedge funds, or superannuation funds aren’t going to come near you,” Mr Krieg said.

“Having those A class grower shares limits AWB’s ability to raise capital and make it a stronger organisation,” he added.

AWB’s B-class shares are owned via listing on the ASX.

With only a reported 50 votes in favour of the AWB’s constitutional reforms needed across Australia, there will be a huge focus early next month on the ballot’s outcome.

The reform proposal has split the AWB board, with four grower directors coming out publicly against the plan.