News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Combat carbon emissions with legumes 

Combat carbon emissions with legumes

10 Mar, 2010 12:35 PM
LEADING soil scientists are promoting legumes within grain rotations as the key to reducing carbon emissions related to grain growing, primarily through their nitrogen replacing qualities.

Ram Dalal of the Queensland-based Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) advocated the use of pulse crops as a potential means to cut carbon emissions.

Dr Dalal said the inclusion of legumes in farming systems reduced carbon emissions, particularly those emissions related to the manufacture and transport of nitrogen fertiliser, which was primarily derived from gas.

“Including a legume and grass phase in farming systems increases carbon sequestration, and even accounting for methane emissions from grazing animals, reduces energy use and carbon emissions,” he said.

And he said concerns over carbon-related issues would have a big impact on land use into the future.

“A major shift in land use is required to balance energy input and energy output.”

Dr Dalal said there were a range of options to increase carbon sequestration, even in the notoriously harsh Australian climate.

He said these changes would reduce nitrous oxide and atmospheric methane emissions from farming so as to reduce the gap between energy input and energy output.

“Farming has always essentially been about carbon farming,” Dr Dalal says.

He said there had been a massive depletion of soil nutrients and carbon in continuous cropping cycles in parts of Australia.

“We estimate that over a 60-year period of cereal cropping under continuous cultivation, soils of northern NSW and southern Queensland have lost more than 40 tonnes of carbon per hectare and four tonnes of nitrogen per hectare.”

Dr Dalal said energy use for cereal production exceeds energy stored in soil carbon sinks in cereal cropping farming systems.

“No-till practice has marginal effect on carbon sequestration but reduces energy use,” he said.

“Nitrogen fertiliser application generally increases carbon sequestration and grain yields but a large proportion of energy use is from manufacture and transport of nitrogen fertiliser.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
A return to legume rotations is long overdue in order to reduce the dependence on N fertilisers. There is one consequence to consider. More legume crop and pasture rotations mean less cereal grain produced. This means less cereal starch, the feedstock converted into ethanol to fill the E10 mandate in NSW. With our variable climate and harvests it is difficult to marry the variable supply of cereal starch with a fixed demand for ethanol. Average cereal grain production in NSW does not show much of a surplus over demand, the E10 mandate will decrease or negate this surplus. With the need for legume rotations there will be no cereal grain spare to be converted to ethanol. A grain ethanol plant has a 30 year life so a mandate to establish such plants must be seriously questioned.
Posted by two bob, 11/03/2010 9:37:39 AM
Warning! Bull$hit alert! Four tonnes of lost nitrogen per hectare? This is obviously a cumulative figure which is entirely contingent on the length of time the losses are claimed to have taken place. And this has not been mentioned. And perhaps our learned friend would care to tell us exactly what proportion of Australian cropping land has not been part of a rotation system, ie, continuous cereal cropping over 60 years? Give us a break mate. The clear lesson from all departmental science reporting over the past two decades is that if there is any form of environmental benefit that might flow from a farming practise then the claimed economic benefits will be over stated by a factor of at least four. Crop rotation has been standard practise for yonks and the vagaries of weather also ensure that grazing takes place often, whether the farmer wants to or not.
Posted by Ian Mott, 11/03/2010 9:56:14 AM
How the wheel turns! The next thing to expect is for state Departments to start re-employing pasture scientists. Pity there are not too many around any more. Go soil carbon!!
Posted by R See 1, 11/03/2010 2:03:14 PM
The Alarmists continue to produce drivel about the evils of the plant food CO2. Carbon is a necessary part of the plant. It is at the moment necessary to get and keep a job in the Queensland departments to waffle about Carbon which they really mean Carbon Dioxide.
Posted by Len, 11/03/2010 2:51:12 PM
My data and US data indicates that many high yielding pulse crops eg soybeans and similar are not nett N contributors to the soil anyway. At least in high yielding crops. it is about carbon stupid, soil carbon! However livestock eating pulses and legume cover crops do reduce methane emissions due to higher digestibility of the leguminous feed. Rotations were the building blocks of ag science and productivity in the 19th and 20th centuries. All sorts of reasons, including disease as well as nutrition, and soil carbon! I am of the view that most no till does actually increase soil carbon, and that view is supported by many scientific articles - locally and overseas. A sense of deja vu??
Posted by R See 1, 11/03/2010 3:50:40 PM
Combat carbon emissions: STOP BREATHING OUT! WAKE UP AUSTRALIA
Posted by what?, 11/03/2010 8:45:08 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
09 March, 2010
08 March, 2010
POLL
Q: Should the Federal Government step in and overhaul the corporate structure of Australian Wool Innovation?

Yes
(42.4%)

No
(43.3%)

Not yet
(14.3%)

Total Votes: 413
Poll Date: 07 March, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...