News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 ABB receives takeover offer from Viterra 

ABB receives takeover offer from Viterra

28 Apr, 2009 04:42 PM
Agribusiness ABB Grain has confirmed that it has received a conditional takeover offer from Canada's Viterra that values the company at more than $1.5 billion.

"ABB advises that it has received a conditional and non-binding proposal from Viterra to acquire all of the shares in ABB via a scheme of arrangement," ABB said in a statement.

The company's shares surged 20 per cent when it resumed trading after the announcement and shortly after midday stock was $1.30 higher at $8.30.

ABB said the proposal was within the range of $9 to $9.50 per ABB share and comprised a mix of cash, Viterra shares and franked dividends.

The offer is a big premium on the company's share price, which was $7 before being placed in a trading halt.

"ABB and Viterra are engaged in discussions which may or may not lead to a binding agreement," ABB said.

"There is no assurance that agreement will be reached or that a transaction will take place at all or within the reported range.

"The proposal is subject to a number of conditions."

ABB has appointed JP Morgan as financial adviser.

Viterra, which is based in the province of Saskatchewan, has a similar profile to ABB Grain - an agricultural company focused on grains, seeds with a supporting handling network.

It has revenue of more than $C4 billion and was formed from the merger of two Canadian agribusiness companies two years ago.

The Canadian proposal threatens to become a catalyst for the long-mooted consolidation of the Australian agribusiness sector.

ABB Grain and AWB proposed a merger last year, but the two companies could not agree on terms.

The companies could not agree on a valuation split, while some ABB directors were also concerned about any liabilities AWB may have to carry arising out of the Iraqi wheat scandal.

The aim was to create an Australian giant that would have been better placed to compete as one company in the new deregulated export grains market.

AWB managing director, Gordon Davis, said late last year that Australian agriculture lacked economies of scale.

"Australian players are small, relatively undercapitalised and have different levels of experience," he said.

"With deregulation, global companies are more active. The Australian industry structure still needs a shake-up to get some scale."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What a tragic farce the Labor Government and the Liberals have turned our wheat industry into by gifting it to overseas interests? Wake up Australia.
Posted by Wheat Fields., 28/04/2009 6:37:21 PM
Soon the Australian Grains Industry will be controlled by foreign interest due to deregulation. AWB & Graincorp will either be sold off or continue their slide to extinction. When the Ports fall under foreign control we will see the total collapse of the traditional family farm. Many of us have been correct so far as to what deregulation will deliver and I beleive we will be correct on these predictions as well. It will be too late. The Australian government and the so-called industry leaders have sold us out either by sheer stupidity or financial gain. You can choose. Growers will have one chance and that is to unite and form a National Co-op, where all profits remain with growers, or see the take over continue and the demise of the Family farm. I fear that the system is to corrupt for farmers to be able to have a voice that is why Federal Labor refused growers a vote on the future of Wheat export marketing.
Posted by Barely surviving, 29/04/2009 8:09:23 AM
Regulation of deregulation... Is it better to have a consolidation of the Australian agribusiness to form one giant that may be taken over by an international interest or to have them picked off one by one by numerous international interests? Is this the brave new world of global corporate agribusiness? The good friend or the evil twin? Personally I am wary of having only big fish but I can understand the rational of corporate consolidation. However, I do feel that most economists who make these decisions may initially have good intentions but are essentially money worshipers... Maybe farmers are going to have to look out for our own in the brave new future or change our own socialistic view of the world to fall completely in line with the economists.
Posted by The deregulation of regulation?, 29/04/2009 8:14:03 AM
What is wrong with our smart country that is supposed to have gone into this recession in very good financial order that we have got to accept so many of these overseas offers to purchase large portions if not the whole of our good Australian owned businesses? Why is the government not stopping this happening? It would appear that we are no longer the smart country! Can someone please inform me. Thank you.
Posted by Margaret, 29/04/2009 8:18:22 AM
What we have here is a Canadian Company that cannot buy out the Canadian wheat industry, but because of our Government's treachery in destroying our single desk, is free to take over ours.
Posted by Realist, 29/04/2009 8:43:23 AM
We should look after our own and not sell everything to overseas buyers. If we keep going in this direction we will own nothing and will become slaves to these unloyal companies and become a third world country ourselves. Why can't they buy in their own countries and leave us alone. We are smart enough to keep going by ourself, we can keep the profits here and build Australia into a much better place with our own exports. Don't allow Australian profits to be taken out by these overseas giants who give nothing back.
Posted by petro, 29/04/2009 9:18:10 AM
Regulation of deregulation puts it very well. But it is the bookworm economists, not the farmers, who fit the modern definition of "socialists". The farmers were real world socialists, dismissed in modern times with the term "agrarian".

Regulation decrees that the board must "act in the best interests of the shareholders". That decrees that $9 in the hand is better than $7 in the book.

Long range forecasts are regarded as speculative. The fact that yesterday's price, now locked in by regulation as today's, may have been depressed by drought is scarcely admissible.

And the bleepwits call this a free market!

Posted by Ted O'Brien, 30/04/2009 3:24:17 AM
Farmers, don't sit on your hands on this one. Get up and say 'No' now and keep on saying it. Your livelihoods are at stake. Can you imagine it?
Posted by Will, 1/05/2009 9:53:53 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
28 April, 2009
27 April, 2009
POLL
Q: Are Managed Investments Schemes hurting or helping rural communities?

Hurting
(73.9%)

Helping
(14.2%)

Undecided
(11.9%)

Total Votes: 479
Poll Date: 26 April, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...