News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Gillard's carbon farm 

Gillard's carbon farm

15 Aug, 2010 02:21 PM
A NEW carbon farming initiative has been unveiled by the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, during her first rural visit of the Federal election campaign near Ballina on Saturday.

Sporting a brand new pair of RM Williams boots, the Prime Minister promised that a re-elected Labor Government would legislate rules that recognise various types of carbon credits that could be generated, and in turn sold, by farmers on the domestic and international markets.

Listen to Julia Gillard here.

This is despite the fact that flawed international accounting rules still exist for agriculture, after a failure to reach agreement on better recognition of agriculture at last year's United Nations climate change summit in Copenhagen.

That means the scope for these incentives announced by the Prime Minister will largely be limited to the voluntary domestic market, however there would be some international market opportunities in the area of forestry.

Ms Gillard, flanked by Minister for Agriculture, Tony Burke, and Minster for Climate Change, Penny Wong, announced that farmers that help reduce and store pollution would receive credits that can be sold in Australia and overseas.

Ms Gillard said the incentive would provide new opportunities for Australian farmers, adding the Government would help facilitate the sale of the carbon credits.

"Farmers and landholders will benefit from a new income stream, and the environment will benefit from reduced pollution," Ms Gillard said.

"There will be no restriction on the number of credits that can be generated, with initial conservative estimates suggesting it could be worth about $500 million (to farmers) over 10 years."

Under the incentive, reforestation would be considered an eligible early means of generating credits, and there is scope for other projects which reduce emissions from livestock, fertiliser use and manure management, savannah burning, legacy waste in landfill and deforestation.

The initiative will be funded from re-allocated money in the Government's renewable energy future fund.

The National Farmers' Federation said in a statement that the announcement "recognises that carbon abatement through the agricultural sector is an opportunity that should not be ignored".

But NFF pointed out that the international community is at varying stages in their efforts to reward the carbon abatement that agricultural and land use management delivers through the proactive efforts of landholders across the globe.

"The international marketplace for carbon credits has been stunted in the wake of the lack of progress at Copenhagen, but the market may certainly develop in the future and so today’s announcement is prudent in gearing farmers up to engage as and when markets develop," NFF said.

"The rules underpinning these markets can often be confusing and difficult to interpret at a practical level.

"This initiative will hopefully deliver some clarity for Australian farmers about what practices delivered on farm will be compliant with the international carbon markets."

NFF said in order to maximise the opportunities for Australian farmers through carbon farming, two key ingredients are still required – the Government must continue to actively pursue changes to the flawed international carbon accounting rules to ensure that they appropriately acknowledge the positive carbon mitigation practices undertaken by farmers.

NFF said extra funding would be needed to optimise the mitigation opportunities through land use and livestock management.

"The ALP has positively acknowledged their support for more R&D funding in this area today but we are still looking for robust funding commitments," NFF said.

The Coalition and the Greens both criticised Labor's plan, with Opposition environment spokesman Greg Hunt arguing the deal short changes farmers.

"Labor’s claim that the Coalition scheme would not allow Australian farmers to access carbon markets is a fabrication," Mr Hunt said.

"Our scheme offers the added benefit of access to funds through our $10.5 billion over 9 years Emissions Reduction Fund.

"Julia Gillard’s scheme short-changes farmers by offering them only a fraction of what the Coalition plan could deliver from the ERF."

Greens deputy leader Christine Milne said Labor's scheme would cause "more problems than it solves because it doesn't understand either the climate challenge or land management".

"The government is dancing around the climate crisis, coming up with more ill-thought-out nonsolutions because it refuses to do the right thing – protect our forest carbon stores and introduce an effective, well-designed price on pollution," Senator Milne said.

"Those in the offset market we have spoken to this morning are crying out for more detail. It sounds like, at best, this announcement is not new, it is simply trying to address the vacuum left when the Greenhouse Friendly scheme ended in July leaving businesses in the voluntary carbon offset markets in limbo.

"We are also concerned that it could create more problems for farmers and other land managers if it focuses solely on carbon without at the same protecting farming land, water and biodiversity from perverse outcomes.

"Farmers across Australia will also be confused, and troubled that this could cause the same problems for them as managed investment schemes. Schemes designed by the city for the city without thinking about the impact on people on the land have a bad history.

"Perhaps worst of all, this is yet another new badly-designed climate promise funded by taking money away from renewable energy."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Putting aside the fact that there are no protocols, for this so-called market anywhere in the world. At US 10 cents per tonne I think I would rather be buying carbon than trying to sell it. Given that carbon is good for soil structure and fertility, at US 10 cents a tonne the quickest and easiest way to improve your soils carbon content would be to buy it. Chuckle- it would be fun to buy a few thousand tonne and then demand delivery.
Posted by Qlander, 15/08/2010 6:29:14 PM
If Julia thinks $500m over ten years($50m/yr) is significant she had best continue on from cloud 9 to somewhere else - like outer space.
Posted by daw, 15/08/2010 6:43:51 PM
Is that after the community think tank, all in the name of fudging, simply having a bet both ways! What’s, that a carbon Tax? and then the farmers and all Australian society will pay more! In the case of agriculture it will mean increase on all inputs, increases in outputs such as transportation of products. Hikes in their power costs and so it will go on. So what will be the final benefit to our agriculture and rural communities be, sweet FA.! The bulk of Australians population is city centric. Their resolve to rejuvenate the environment and their resources will in turn assist agricultures productivity. It is a matter of working in a partnership for a mutual/ National benefit. The coalition’s policy is to reduce the stress on all, nationwide house hold budgets!
Posted by graham, 16/08/2010 5:00:54 AM
From a women who has no understanding of agriculture. Could not be trusted by her leader. And showed her ignorance about water policy, having to be rescued by her Minister??
Posted by farmertom, 16/08/2010 5:55:35 AM
The first rule of business survival is, "never do business with spivs". When Gillard has remedied all the past injustices relating to carbon that have been meted out by her party at local, state and federal level. And has implemented firm protections, in both federal and state constitutions, against them ever happening again. Then we might, just might, think about taking her seriously.
Posted by Ian Mott, 16/08/2010 10:15:14 AM
Actually, there is a similar market already up and running, under Kyoto rules, in Alberta. The scheme Labor's offering would not cover soil, though the voluntary National Carbon Offsets Standard allows for it, subject to the development of decent accounting. The international price for carbon is around $20/tonne, not ten cents - the price on the Chicago Climate Exchange, which is not bound by Kyoto rules.
Posted by Michael, 16/08/2010 10:47:00 AM
Ms Gillard says a Labor government will study the possibility of storing carbon in soil. How long would that take? How many academics could live on how many grants, for how many years, and still get nowhere? My father and I did it with Keyline fifty years ago. Natural farmers, organic farmers have been doing it for a few thousand years. So let’s all do it. The Coalition have promised you farmers a carbon dioxide equivalent of $10 a tonne for all the humus you can add to your soil. That’s about $20 a tonne for added humus. And there are no strings attached. You just figure the best, the easiest and the cheapest way of doing it. As long as the carbon levels go up you get your money. It’s a win, win for all.
Posted by Allan Yeomans, 16/08/2010 11:44:58 AM
Michael: You certainly highlight the ridiculousness of the situation, the value of what is supposed to be an internationally standard item (I assume that a carbon dioxide molecule is the same in Alberta as it is in Chicago) varies by 20,000% depending on which dodgy market or system of rules and accounting you use.
Posted by Qlander, 16/08/2010 1:20:09 PM
This promise is just another example of stupidity. How is it possible to sequester carbon in broadhectare vegetation growth when harvesting stormwater for irrigation has been virtually outlawed? Indeed, how many more examples of stupidity must gush from the chattering synapse of enviro-religionised brains before practical minded people declare enough is enough?
Posted by jock, 16/08/2010 1:54:10 PM
I agree with most of what Allan Yeomans says. Aust farmers have been sequestering carbon for years, and it should be a win-win situation. But I really can't believe that these citycentric politicians and bureaucrats are likely to be doing any thing that will put money in farmers pockets. Such is their hatred of this minority.
Posted by R, 16/08/2010 3:32:31 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
15 August, 2010
13 August, 2010
POLL
Q: What do you think will be the result of this Saturday's election?

Labor victory
(29.1%)

Coalition victory
(53.5%)

Hung parliament
(17.4%)

Total Votes: 684
Poll Date: 15 August, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...