News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Budget 08: Wong must spell out on-farm water ... 

Budget 08: Wong must spell out on-farm water investments

14/05/2008 9:57:00 AM
Minister for Water, Penny Wong needs to "come clean" and explain how she is going to spend the $5.8 billion she has promised for upgrading irrigation systems, says the Opposition's spokesman for water security, John Cobb.

There was no costing in the budget papers of the $5.8bn component of the government's big Water for the Future plan. There has been much anticipation from farmers, of how the budget would help clarify the amount that would go to on-farm works and whether savings would be shared equally between the environment and irrigators.

No mention in the budget means upgrades to on-farm irrigation systems will probably not happen this financial year.

The budget papers reiterated an earlier commitment by Senator Wong to bring forward $400 million worth of funding to "accelerate investment in water savings infrastructure" and to buy water from willing sellers.

The papers say water efficiency projects from jurisdictions within the basin, including private irrigation companies, will also be considered "in due course" under the $5.8bn-10 year Sustainable Rural Water Use and Infrastructure program.

But, it is said, before the government invests in those projects they would need to demonstrate an ability to "deliver value for money" and achieve "substantial and lasting returns" of water to secure improvements in the health of the river.

The National Farmers Federation last week called for the Government to release a breakdown of funding details within the water infrastructure program and spell-out whether on-farm works would still be considered for funding.

This week President, David Crombie, acknowledged that detail was missing and said NFF would be seeking "clarification" from Senator Wong's office on the program and its priorities.

Mr Cobb said more detail and costing of the $5.8b program should have been in this year's budget.

He said the government must commit to sharing savings from improvements to on-farm infrastructure 50-50 if it wants to get people involved.

"Senator Wong has some serious explaining to do," Mr Cobb said.

"When is she going to invest money in irrigation infrastructure?"

"When is she going to create more water savings on the transfer of water, and water systems?

"If she's going to pull the plug on investments in on-farm savings, when is she going to say so?

"Penny Wong has to stop saying it will all become apparent and start answering questions on when she is going to start funding on-farm irrigation efficiency."

Mr Cobb said buying water back from irrigators was "taking the easy way out" to impress Sydney and Melbourne.

He said the budget papers show that in 2009/2010 the Government plans to purchase $482m worth of irrigation licences – "a heck of a lot of water to buy in one year", he added.

"In any one year there's never been more than 100 gigalitres of water sold.

History says it would take 20-30 years to buy $3.1 billion worth of water (as the Government intends) at $2000 (a megalitre).

"The only way Senator Wong can come close to spending this sort of money is if there's no-one else in the market, and (this would) mean she's going to have to pay prices which totally exclude anyone else."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
One day Senator Wong will realise that to save our environment, as well as our irrigation industry, she might have to get out from behind the office desk and physically do something, rather than hide behind the fanciful idea that buying water entitlements will actually put water back in the river system.

To fix the problem is so simple!

The first step is decommission the Menindee Lakes!

If you want the next steps you will have to pay me a lot of money!

Posted by Dave on 15/05/2008 6:31:07 AM
Sometimes one can be excused for thinking that most Australian politicians, together with most Australians as well as the general media, live on the moon.

Where was our dear old Liberal friend Cobby or indeed all the Opposition Labor politicians just a few years ago when the problems with the Murray Darling system were more than clearly looming from many directions and before John Howard took the bold long deferred step to spend some money on the mess?

Hardly heard a real squeak out of any of them on the subject in those days.

Bit late now.

Wong probably doesn't want to be wrong 'cause she knows what's at stake in the long term for all of Australia.

If they do not get this right there will be hell to pay all 'round.

No sense in rushing into it, without a careful plan.

Although, anything they come up with at this late stage won't really make a lot of immediate difference or be instituted in a useful time frame.

Food prices are going to soar as more farms are forced to close or we'll import it from overseas from developing countries, run under cheaper imported labour or pay the new multinational owners who will gladly take over the family farms for a song.

Even the ten billion dollars is laughable given the enormous size of the problem and just a drop in the bucket when it comes to fixing up the mess created by decades of government neglect.

Government paid scientists said 20 years ago that people in Adelaide would be drinking salt water by about now and they were right.

Politicians and the general Australian public ignore the scientific research fraternity at their own demise.

The chickens are coming home to roost and everyone's squealing.

Oh... incidently, how much was Australian research funding on environmental issues such as this and on developing new forms of Australian agriculture or Australian owned and operated green energy projects increased under yesterday's you beaut Labour budget??

Answer... not much, given the scale of the problems this country is facing.

Will they ever learn?

Sincerely doubt it.

Posted by all Bloody Water on 15/05/2008 4:30:29 PM
"in due course" - What does that mean?

The government will still be making plans when the next election comes around, and that won't make it right.

Where will we import our food from?

Too many thinkers and considerers and absolutely no doers.

That's bureaucracy for you.

Posted by Will on 18/05/2008 6:08:33 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Minister for Water, Penny Wong needs to explain how she is going to spend the $5.8 billion she has promised for upgrading irrigation systems.
Minister for Water, Penny Wong needs to explain how she is going to spend the $5.8 billion she has promised for upgrading irrigation systems.


6/10/2008 | In journalism there is nothing worse than interviewing someone with TB - True Believerism. But the rapidly changing world is turning traditional ideology upside down, leaving TB sufferers supporting a brand and not a belief.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
JB Fairfax Scholarship for Rural Journalism
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...