News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Will there be a fart tax Mr Rudd? 

Will there be a fart tax Mr Rudd?

15/07/2008 12:06:00 PM
As Australians await the Rudd Government’s Wednesday release of its Green Paper on its emissions trading scheme, an important question remains unanswered – will there be a fart tax, Mr Rudd?

The Rudd Government needs to say whether it will include the methane gas produced by cows and sheep in its emissions trading scheme.

Will the Rudd government confirm whether it will do what New Zealand did, which is, propose a fart tax?

“It might sound like a joke but penalising farmers for the gases produced by livestock is a serious matter," Family First Leader Senator Steve Fielding said today.

"The CSIRO has been working for years on foods consumed by cows and sheep to help reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.”

“Slapping extra costs on farmers because their animals fart is a serious problem, as the New Zealand government found out when it was forced to drop its tax after farmers decided it was a stinker,” Senator Fielding said.

“If the Rudd Government does propose a new fart tax, Family First wants to know the exact impact on farmers.”

He says the facts are:

1. Methane from sheep and cattle is estimated to account for over 12pc of Australia’s total greenhouse gas emissions and 70pc of agricultural emissions. (National Greenhouse Gas Inventory, 2006)

2. Beef Cooperative Research Centre hopes to cut Australia's livestock methane emissions by 20pc by 2012. (ABC, Landline, “Scientists aiming to cut livestock emissions”, first published April 15 2007)

3. The world has 1.33 billion cattle and 1.1 billion sheep and goats. (CSIRO, 1998)

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What about people? There are a few people in my office that are going to be in real trouble.
Posted by Mr Methane on 15/07/2008 10:47:47 PM
Rudd will have to pay then wouldn't he, he farts out his mouth more than my cows do.
Posted by Patrick on 16/07/2008 7:01:36 AM
Hopefully Mr Fielding's advisers will tell him that the main emissions from cattle are from their front end and not the back.
Posted by Get it right on 16/07/2008 8:18:25 AM
Mr Rudd may be aware that humans also fart. Vegetarians fart more than meat eaters so there should be an offset for this human fart reducing factor in his methane carbon accounting.
Posted by moo on 16/07/2008 8:36:02 AM
If we are talking about EMISSIONS then how about we first define just what an emission is? It is "that which is sent out, issued, or put in circulation at one time". Implied in this is that the thing emitted was NOT in circulation beforehand. Ruminant animals are not magicians or alchemists - they do not create matter. They are however a vital and 100% natural part of the critical carbon cycle. The carbon goes in to them as part of the grass9CHO molecules), leaves them as part of methane (CH4) or carbon dioxide (CO2), and then circles right round again over time to be basorbed by the grass once again via photosynthesis - and the cycle begins again. There is a huge and fundamental difference between methane CYCLED by a ruminant animal and methane EMITTED by mankind digging up a coal seam or drilling down to a gas field.
Posted by soil carbon on 16/07/2008 8:55:16 AM
It's just another blow for the Australian farmer, what else can we expect from these city politicians? Another levy that we have no choice in paying. And another cop out for the government, instead of looking at the real cause of our emissions. What will these city folk do when they can't eat meat??
Posted by buster on 16/07/2008 9:32:05 AM
Except that methane has around 24 times the global warming impact than CO2 so just because livestock consume carbon in their food there is still a net gain in the sector's contribution to greenhouse gas emissions. All jokes about farting aside, this is a serious issue and given that the livestock sector has more impact on global warming than the transport sector, agriculture needs to be included in an emissions trading scheme. What Rudd needs to think about is what effect this will have on farming communities and how the government can support farmers to move to more sustainable agricultural practices.
Posted by concerned on 16/07/2008 9:36:31 AM
I think it is a burp tax not a fart tax that is of concern.
Posted by hot air on 16/07/2008 10:03:33 AM
Mr Rudd and his Government are a whole pack of wind bags - will the taxpayer have to pay tax on all that hot air?
Posted by Blind Freddy on 16/07/2008 11:16:14 AM
Family First have done it again! Another contribution of embarrassing hot air released the political atmosphere...
Posted by unconcerned on 16/07/2008 11:29:35 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Do you believe the creation of an emissions trading system poses a threat or opportunity for your farm business?

Threat
(59.6%)

Opportunity
(17.7%)

Unsure - more information needed
(22.7%)

Total Votes: 480
Poll Date: 13/07/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...