News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Water buyback lacks clear goals: independent report 

Water buyback lacks clear goals: independent report

20/10/2008 2:14:00 PM
The Federal Government must set clear goals and targets for its $3.1 billion environmental water buyback and communicate them, according to an independent review of the $50m pilot water purchase released on Thursday.

Although declaring the initial buyback delivered value for money for the Government and was efficiently run, Hyder Consulting said the only reason the lack of a specific target had had minimal impact in the first round was because the volume bought was so small.

"The evaluation of appropriateness of future purchases will be difficult without clarification of the goals and objectives of the water purchases plan," it found.

"It is essential that the objectives and targets are clarified."

It also advocates:

• greater co ordination of the multiple State and Federal purchase programmes to reduce conflict and competition;

• that the Government work more closely with irrigation communities on restructuring;

• investigation into buying specific environmental outcomes;

• purchase of unregulated entitlement;

• conversion of low security to high security entitlement; and

• purchase of allocated water to meet short term needs.

The call for clear goals echoes community criticism of the lack of transparency and ad hoc nature of the buyback process, which irrigation groups say creates uncertainty and threatens to undermine the viability of rural communities.

The release of a planned approach to the buyback is also one of the conditions set down by the Victorian Government as essential before it will consider lifting the 4pc annual limit on permanent trade out of a district which is hindering further Federal purchases of Victorian high security water.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Surprise, surprise, the government has a plan for buying water licenses but no plan for what to do with them… The comments on the government purchase of “Toorale” on the 4 Corners program on ABC TV on Monday night were embarrassing. Really and Truly.
Posted by really and truly on 21/10/2008 8:23:18 AM
It is essential that the Government set targets for things such as number of breeding birds, number of hectares of wetlands, number of living red gums. If these targets are not set the green fundamentalists will continue to scream for more and more water. We all know that these people will not be satisfied until there is no irrigation and no profit in rural communities. They think that we can just have a massive national park the full length of the MDB with all regional communities hosting tourists! No irrigation = no profits = no R+D = no future.
Posted by Don on 21/10/2008 9:27:53 AM
Certain rural interests want a plan for the buyback, but none of them asked for a plan when water licences were being given out to anyone who put their hand out. No, it was just snouts in the trough. Even now the Queensland Government is allowing more major development. It is about time that every major new agricultural project had to complete an environmental impact assessment, just like a mining project has to.
Posted by Barney on 21/10/2008 10:23:47 AM
We can't expect there to be a plan for a knee-jerk reaction to a drought. The new government adopted an existing program & changed it to suit their political agenda, which was to be expected. I don't know that the now opposition's plan was any good either. This buyback has many rural communities VERY worried about their futures. Who would invest in a business in an irrigation area now, if a large part of the water could be lost in the near future?
Posted by Trev on 21/10/2008 11:29:01 AM
Why should the Government be forced to reveal its plans in detail? This will only provide a benefit to sellers resulting in tax payers paying more than the agricultural market is prepared to pay. I want my tax to be most effective in buying reliable environmental flows and now not later.
Posted by Annoyed on 21/10/2008 4:35:07 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Who will receive your first vote in the AWI board elections?

Brian van Rooyen
(19.7%)

George Falkiner
(14.1%)

Chris Abell
(3.8%)

Will Roberts
(7%)

Ken Boundy
(1.6%)

David Webster
(7.8%)

Robyn Clubb
(3.5%)

Meredith Sheil
(12.7%)

John Keniry
(5.4%)

Laurence Modiano
(24.3%)

Total Votes: 370
Poll Date: 19/10/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...