News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Water bought back - on paper, at least 

Water bought back - on paper, at least

23/05/2008 8:45:00 AM
Troubled wetlands including the Macquarie Marshes may get some relief after the Federal Government succeeded in buying back 35 billion litres of water for the environment from irrigators in the Murray-Darling Basin, its first big water buy-back under the plan to save the river system.

The Federal Climate Change Minister, Penny Wong, will give State Ministers details of the $50 million buy-back of permanent water licences from farmers at a meeting in Adelaide today.

Despite concerns that farmers would not sell and the buy-back would inflate the price of water, several irrigators appeared willing to sell their permanent water entitlements after one of the worst droughts in Australia's history.

The price is hard to assess because the Government bought valuable "high-security" entitlements often used by farmers with permanent plantings and general water entitlements.

"This first buy-back of entitlements is a down payment on the future of the Murray-Darling Basin as we tackle the effects of climate change, drought and over-allocation on its rivers and communities," Senator Wong said.

But she conceded that dams and water storage levels across the Murray-Darling are so low that "it may be some time before the water is able to be delivered".

"It's pretty much water on paper right now," Richard Kingsford, an adviser on the Government's water buy-back committee said.

Many dams in the Basin are only between 10pc and 20pc full.

Many holders of general entitlements have not been able to get water for several years.

But Professor Kingsford said he was very pleased with the first buy-back.

"It's water in the bank. When it does rain, you will have environmental flows ready to go," he said.

The water bought will eventually flow to critical wetlands that are home to bird breeding colonies in NSW and South Australia.

The Federal Government has allocated $3 billion to buy back water licences over the next 10 years and there are fears that this will eventually push up water prices for irrigators who want to remain on the land.

As well, water flows in the Murray-Darling are still extremely low.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The most effective way to quickly address part of the environmental water issues is to immediately put an end to the (often illegal) diversion from the northern MDBC rivers.

This will allow natural flooding to occur annually.

Posted by Macca on 26/05/2008 9:10:11 AM
Politics are our main way to fix the Murray.

The three-year life of parliament means the politicians are all taking a Band-Aid approach.

Even Karlene "pray for rain" Maywald has been taxing South Australians over $40 million the last two years for this "save the Murray" fund and they still don't have answers.

Industry has to fix this problem and it is going cost money.

We need to consider relocating water from the north of Australia to Southern Australia either by piping or open channels whatever is the best way.

The Ord River dam alone could drought proof Perth and South Australia.

Rainfall in Tully and surrounding areas could be piped into Brisbane and the headwaters of the Darling to eventually flow into the middle and lower reaches of the Murray keeping the majority of irrigators afloat and save these Murray River towns.

As a South Australian, it is just horrible to see the effects on the lakes of Alexandrina and the Coorong.

We need politicians with better vision than we have now.

The cost of water will increase but that is better than no water at all.

I would be interested in others' opinions.

Posted by wacca on 26/05/2008 2:25:32 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: How do rate this year's Federal Budget offerings for rural and regional Australia?

Excellent
(1.3%)

Good
(2.8%)

Average
(9.5%)

Poor
(37.7%)

Terrible
(48.7%)

Total Votes: 316
Poll Date: 18/05/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...