News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Voiceless ads aim to get public 'emotional' 

Voiceless ads aim to get public 'emotional'

20 Feb, 2012 07:17 AM
ANIMAL rights lobby Voiceless is aiming to make the public "emotional" with its new campaign claiming pigs and chickens in Australia are raised in worse conditions than European animals.

According to Voiceless, which uses graphic and confronting imagery in its new campaign, Australia lags behind the European Union, which over the past decade has passed the world's toughest animal cruelty laws.

Actor Hugo Weaving fronts the campaign to be launched today.

''If I treated a dog the way pigs and chickens are treated on these farms, I'd likely be prosecuted,'' Weaving says.

Voiceless' strategy is to make the public ''emotional'' and direct that emotion towards politicians, according to chief executive of Voiceless, Dana Campbell.

''We all know how politics works; it's not going to go anywhere unless politicians know there are votes behind those opinions,'' Ms Campbell said.

Channels Nine and Seven have promised Voiceless free TV ad spots, and Ms Campbell is talking to GetUp! about continuing the campaign over the coming months.

She said that Australian animal law has been hamstrung because the people charged with enforcing it are the same people whose job is to protect the profits of food producers.

Chairman of the Barristers Animal Welfare Panel, Graeme McEwen, agreed.

''Animal welfare … is administered by the departments of primary industries,'' he said.

''It's like putting the minister for resources and mineral development in charge of climate change.

''These departments view themselves as the friend of industry. Nothing wrong with that; but they should not be in charge of animal welfare,'' Mr McEwen said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is a great step forward in the exposure of the gross discrimination perpetrated by humans against certain other animal species. As Hugo weaving alludes to, treating your dog as some intensively farmed animals are could cause someone to be charged. Animals are not products and commodities to be produced for the cheapest price possible. They are to be considered and treated with the same respect and compassion we give our family pet dogs and cats. To continue down the factory farming path is unacceptable and the public will demand change from farmers in animal agriculture
Posted by Benjamnpgarden, 20/02/2012 7:58:35 AM
Grrrr...and in the donations will roll. Seriously, these people have no idea of the fact that to run a profitable livestock business the welfare of the animal is of utmost importance.

Why not target something a bit more difficult, like dogs kept in cages for butchering in China, or elephants chained to one spot in Thailand, or emaciated dogs roaming freely in Indonesia. Or closer to home - the millions of native animals killed on roads each year, or killed by cats or feral pigs.

Or the millions of urban dogs, cats, birds, kept locked up in tiny backyards or flats - cruel to a farmer...

Posted by Bluey, 20/02/2012 8:06:22 AM
Sorry Benji the only thing that the public will demand is lower prices.
Posted by john from tamworth, 20/02/2012 9:14:47 AM
Jonny, a condescending tone does nothing to further your argument. The public ( whether the rural sector likes it or not ) is being slowly educated that the REAL cost of cheap meat is the sad living conditions for millions of animals. The main advantage that intensive animal production operations have at present is the disconnect and unawareness of the public as to what goes on. People do truly want fair treatment of animals, just look at how people treat their pet dogs,cats etc. Once the link is made more clear,change will be swift towards more humane methods of production.
Posted by Benjaminpgarden, 20/02/2012 10:11:53 AM
The animal loving, human hating rspca is right on to anyone who doesn't look after their animals so why the hell do these id tenT's think they have any grounds for complaint?

Go tell the rspca if you have a genuine grievance or is there more in it by get ing free publicity?

Posted by daw, 20/02/2012 10:15:27 AM
Free spots on Channel 9 and 7 eh? So when will the industries demand equal free time?
Posted by Ian Mott, 20/02/2012 10:23:40 AM
Would they like us to tie pretty pink bows around their necks and name them! I guess most people believe that pigs and chickens should roam free in the forest. People are so out of touch with the reality of where there food comes from. Pigs raised for meat do not require acres of land to graze on but a small pen where they are waited on hand and foot. Yes I agree that pen sizes and chicken sheds could be a little more generous in size but the reality in europe is that all meat costs at least 25% more too. Will the greeny consumer be willing to pay more for their meat??? I bet not!!!
Posted by Farmer Greg, 20/02/2012 10:41:36 AM
john from tamworth:

Exactly right - while giving donations to groups like this to ease their conscience.

Posted by Qlander, 20/02/2012 10:47:53 AM
Benj, if the public want change then the public will have to pay. Farmers cannot continue to subsidise food for the public at cost or below. The consumer wants cheep food and that sets the standards. Welfare costs money. Instead of constantly attacking the farmer, your lot should try growing a brain and use it to see where the real problem lies.
Posted by Hungry?, 20/02/2012 10:52:33 AM
If they want to change then simple, pay more for it.

In the usa you can buy chicken breast for less than $4 au a kg, I wonder if they shouldnt be looking to shut them down to.

The public want to pay less, especially in these times, this will get laughed of tv pretty quick.

Posted by mick, 20/02/2012 11:10:39 AM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
24 January, 2012
13 February, 2012
21 November, 2011
POLL
Q: Do you think chickens require more space than they are currently provided to be reasonably said to be "free to roam"?

Yes
(69.1%)

No
(30.9%)

Total Votes: 317
Poll Date: 14 February, 2012

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...