News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Rural industries face hit with emissions trading 

Rural industries face hit with emissions trading

29/08/2008 2:20:00 PM
Australian rural industries are facing a major hit to their international competitiveness under the Federal Government's emissions trading scheme, according to the Queensland Farmers’ Federation.

QFF chief executive officer John Cherry said that while emissions from farming operations would be initially excluded from the ETS, the price of inputs would rise adding sharply to costs.

"With 70pc of agricultural produce being exported, there is no opportunity to pass these costs on and farmers will have to absorb a major reduction in their margins as a result," he said.

"We are calling on the Federal and State Governments to urgently commission detailed research on the cost impact on farming enterprises of the impact of the ETS on inputs, and what that will mean for competitiveness and profitability."

Mr Cherry said that for cropping enterprises around 75pc of all emissions come from inputs such as fuel, fertiliser, chemicals, electricity and transport, which will all be included in the ETS from day one.

"Yet, other than a fuel rebate on fuel used on farm, we will have to cop all increases in costs without compensation, even though most rural produce is exported," he said.

"On a $40/tonne carbon price, farmers will face a cost increase of 4-6pc, enough to wipe out the very narrow profit margins for many industries."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I am already running at a loss, so are most other woolgrowers.

If any more costs are expected to be carried by us, then pretty soon we will be paying the wool buyers to buy our wool.

Krudd's spining while rural Aus is burning, like Rome.

The marketplace is currently telling us it dosnt like anything we do but loves timber & olive MIS.

What does it take to see there is a problem?

Posted by THE FARMER on 29/08/2008 3:04:56 PM
Rudd doesn't care. No drought or starving stock in the Lodge. No busting your guts,living on bugger all in the hard years, trying to make it through to the good ones. He thinks they're all good years out here, and that we live the life of Riley.

Taxing the food that Australians eat, and that produces export income could only be the brain child of a narrow-minded politician.

And taxing the farmers for creating that produce is the brain child of a narrow-minded politician.

Posted by Brindi on 29/08/2008 8:58:29 PM
The ramifications are in fact far greater than this!

The flow-on effects of the introductions of the ETS as it stands presently (unlike the introduction of the GST back in 2000), will have a significant inflationary effect over an extended period of time throughout the entire economy as businesses gradually pass on there higher costs of production in the form of higher retail prices for there goods.

This in itself will make it very difficult for the government to ascertain just what is the true underlying inflation.

Furthermore, as stated in the article, agriculture in Australia is predominantly an exporting nation and subject to world supply and demand pricing determinations.

As a result, it has no effective risk management measures to counter the ETS rollout. It is for this very reason that agriculture in Australia needs to be in the initial rollout of the ETS.

So that we, as primary producers, can show and depick the cost burdon as it evolves and thus presumably on a quarterly basis make a counter claim to the government in order to maintain our term of trade and likewise for the government to balance it's books.

Posted by Ralph Gebhardt on 1/09/2008 7:29:03 AM
I fail to see how any average intelligent Australian can see the ETS as anything more but a new tax.

According to Rudd, this is going to save the environment.

A load of scientific bull. Australia produces bugger-all of world emissions and other countries are set to gain economic advantages over Australia.

I cannot see any sense in it whatsoever

Posted by Pat on 1/09/2008 10:43:46 AM
All the GHG emissions taxes need to be credit on export and charged on import of each product. If this is not done Australian industries will be uncompeitive.

You can then expect an even more massive trade deficit and loss of jobs.

Posted by terry on 1/09/2008 1:04:38 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Do you support AWB's decision to extend the voting period for its push to restructure the shareholding system?

Yes
(48%)

No
(41%)

Undecided
(11%)

Total Votes: 273
Poll Date: 24/08/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...