News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Road to Copenhagen: Farmer says wind turbines will ... 

Road to Copenhagen: Farmer says wind turbines will help finance his retirement

21 Nov, 2009 09:14 AM
FARMERS from the tiny island of Samso, Denmark, supply more than half the vegetables enjoyed by the residents of Copenhagen.

In the past decade, however, it's been their ability to generate alternative energy from wind, solar and biomass which has been in hot demand.

For dairy farmer, Jorgen Tranberg, the move into renewable energy has been a simple one. And it's making him lots of money.

These days, Mr Tranberg describes himself as a windfarmer with some dairy cows. He says without doubt renewable energy, and in particular wind power, is a better pathway to money than is dairying.

Mr Tranberg runs a dairy with 150 milking cows on 100 hectares at Samso. While he's been a passionate advocate for achieving fairer milk prices for Danish farmers over the years, it's the one and a half wind turbines he now owns which bring home all the cash.

Mr Tranberg spent close to $A1.3 million to buy a one megawatt turbine on Samso nine years ago which produces 2.5m kilowatts of power each year.

It's now fully paid off, and he's now making more than $200,000 from sending power back to the main electricity grid.

His turbine generates enough power to supply 500 families.

With the profits, Mr Tranberg went halves in a turbine at sea, a 2.3 megawatt turbine producing 8m kilowatts a year, costing him more than $A4m six years ago.

Mr Tranberg explained that much of the community acceptance of wind turbines had been made possible from co-operative share investments allowing local ownership in these otherwise imposing, often noisy structures.

"There are a lot of people on Samso who own parts (shares) in wind turbines," Mr Tranberg said.

"It's quite difficult to go around Samso and find people who don't like the wind turbines.

"If we want people to look at these turbines and live with then they must have parts…then they are more beautiful."

Samso's co-operative approach has been so successful that it’s a model being replicated across the country as the Government attempts to remove the community antagonism and the "not in my backyard attitude" which often accompanies new wind farm developments.

Mr Tranberg laughed when told many Australian farmers don't believe in climate change.

"What? They don't believe in climate change?" he exclaimed.

"I can feel it every year. Now we're taking our cows out two weeks before (early) and put the maize in two weeks before…

"Of course it's happening. But climate change doesn't mean the worst for us.

"The biggest point is how we change our farming so we get the most money out of climate change.

"We must change in the fields, have some other kinds of income from the land.

"Farmers must change what they grow on their land.

"You know peaches, normally you cannot grow them in Denmark because it's too cold, but now I have them on my farm because it's getting warmer.

"Maybe in 10 years we'll be able to grow kiwifruit."

Mr Tranberg said farmers in the EU and Denmark held the view that climate change in Australia would become so bad in the next decade that they would be unable to produce food.

"Farming in Australia is getting warmer and warmer with no rain, and will just close," he said.

Mr Tranberg hinted that his future in farming, especially as he gets older, might not be with his cows but in buying up more wind turbines.

He said many Danish farmers were investing in wind farms in Germany. He joked that come retirement he can see himself "playing golf and owning wind turbines".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Wind turbines are a scam, contracts leave landholders in a legal mess, google landholder contract review, see the mess at Waubra with turbine noise.
Posted by jeff, 21/11/2009 9:51:02 AM, on Stock & Land
Wind turbines destroy community cohesion, just look at Waubra. Any wonder Joe No Helper will get the boot at the next election!
Posted by Byrce, 21/11/2009 9:53:27 AM, on Stock & Land
Australian farmers do believe in climate change Lucy. We have lived in one of the most constantly changing and volatile climates on the planet, for generations. And THAT is why we don't buy this 'The gods are angry, bring your virgin daughters to the temple for sacrifice' garbage that has been forced on to us. Check the records for the FIRST half of last century. And compare them with what is currently happening.
Posted by Qlander, 22/11/2009 1:28:27 PM, on Queensland Country Life
I'll plant all my valuable grain and stock country down to trees and forget about growing food. KRudd's ETS will make all the input costs too great for me to grow clean green food. I cannot cover the cost of production now since KRudd killed our marketing system and now he wants to put growing food out of the reach of growers by inflating our inputs. God help Australia as nothing will save us from the New World order government led by KRudd.
Posted by Mark, 23/11/2009 7:11:03 AM, on The Land
Are you all serious? The article is about another way. About not having to be stuck in the past. About not just buying in to the stereotypes of 'I'm a farmer, so I have to hate all this Labor Government is doing and Climate Change is a scam" etc. etc. etc. Discuss the issue by all means, but responding to an article about a farmer making a handsome profit through his windmill by talking about New World Order Governments... Seriously you have to be kidding. And if wind turbine contracts leave landholders in a legal mess (you might be right, I have no idea) then dispute the contracts. Note all the good the wind energy will do for a private person, his family, his community, his country. And yes they might be noisy, but as the Danish farmer will tell you 'it is the sound of money'. Beside that wind turbine technology will develop. They will become more silent, they will produce more power, be cheaper, be able to store energy etc. Did the Wright brothers invent the first aeroplane or a moon rocket? Did anyone tell them to sstop flying because they were noisy and couldn't fly to the moon?
Posted by Peter, 23/11/2009 11:53:09 AM, on Stock & Land
Slugging a huge TAX on those who feed the world with carbon freindly techniques will not lower carbon emmissions Peter. It will only make more people hungry and pay more for imported food grown on human crap. If you want to lower carbon you do not TAX people. You encourage Government led change by encouragement. That is if there is a problem to solve in the first place. At school I learnt that carbon was an essential element to grow food. Perhaps stopping the clearing of the world's rain forest should be the first step. Most is being cleared to produce palm oil which is used to reduce green house gasses? Don't figure does it?
Posted by Mark, 23/11/2009 5:49:54 PM, on The Land
Hi Mark, Call it a tax or whatever - I do not care. We have just reached a situation where we the people of this world have refused to voluntarily reduce the amount of greenhouse gasses, polution etc. we are causing. That is why we now have a situation where an ETS scheme is necessary. We have had a chance to change, but chosen not to, so maybe now we need a bit more stick and less carrot. Of course you are right that we should stop clearing rain forests, but the fact is we don't. Therefore we will have to pay in another area = ETS/tax etc. Regarding the coment about whether there is a problem to solve in the first place. I am personally leaning towards the huge majority of scientists warning about climate change - you know better be safe than sorry. But even if they are wrong and man made climate change is actually not happening, what will then be the outcome of reducing co2 emissions and other forms of pollution? Cleaner air, rivers, less acid rain, better soil to grow food in and the list goes on forever. I can't see how we can lose, even though we will have to pay more for groceries and whatever else is produced using co2 = everything.
Posted by Peter, 24/11/2009 12:02:49 PM, on Stock & Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
18 November, 2009
20 November, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you believe your farm business can profit from an emissions trading scheme?

Yes
(20.3%)

No
(70.1%)

Undecided
(9.6%)

Total Votes: 606
Poll Date: 15 November, 2009

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Pro-Tech
 
Metromax
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
photo gallery
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL Twitter
 
QCL Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...