News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 RLPBs to be overhauled in NSW 

RLPBs to be overhauled in NSW

6/06/2008 4:13:00 PM
There are wide-ranging reforms planned for the NSW Rural Lands Protection Boards, including significant amalgamations and the turning over of land to the State Government.

Recommendations handed down to the RLPB State Council included the State's 47 boards reduced to 14, which would cut the number of board directors from 380 to 112.

Each board will be managed locally and overseen by a nine member State Board of Management.

Travelling Stock Reserves, mostly located on the Mid-North Coast in places such as Kempsey and are too costly for the organisation to run and will be handed over to the Department of Lands.

But NSW Farmers' Association president Jock Laurie says any changes in operation of the Boards must not impact on the level of service provided to levy payers.

"The Association has long been a supporter of the present structure of RLPBs, and it recognises the important role they play in the management of livestock issues at the local level," Mr Laurie said.

"The aim of this review is to critically analyse the structure and administration so as to deliver the maximum service at maximum efficiency to the ratepayer.

"In particular we support the independent Board structure and role it has as a medium between local landholders and Government, so we would be very reluctant to see this change."

The Association’s submission to the review recommended that skills based directors be appointed to Boards, as this could help increase effectiveness and efficiency of Boards.

"We also suggested that there needs to be acknowledgement and financial support from the State government for the private and public good activities that the Boards undertake on its behalf, so it’s positive that both of these recommendations have been picked up in the report," Mr Laurie said.

The NSW Farmers’ Association will be meeting with representatives of the RLPB State Council early next week to discuss the report.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Is this a news report on the review recommendations or an interview with Jock Laurie who seems not to have read the document yet? Strange journalism online!!
Posted by Mark Jenson on 8/06/2008 12:02:20 PM
It will not matter what they do . The simple fact is that the levy they charge is illegal under the constitution. It is an excise. And how dumb are farmers in NSW you are the only farmers in Australia paying this impost. Dumb and dumber and led by a similar farm organisation.
Posted by mabel Peton Smyth on 10/06/2008 9:28:13 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: How do rate the performance of the Rudd Government after its first six months in office?

Excellent
(8.4%)

Good
(10.5%)

Average
(16.2%)

Poor
(30.9%)

Terrible
(33.9%)

Total Votes: 722
Poll Date: 1/06/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...