News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Put up now or face climate poll, Libs told 

Put up now or face climate poll, Libs told

23 Sep, 2009 05:33 AM
THE Rudd Government has given the Opposition less than a month to finalise the changes it wants to the emissions trading scheme or be frozen out and risk an early election.

In a terse letter to Malcolm Turnbull yesterday, the Climate Change Minister, Penny Wong, said the Opposition has had enough time to reach a position.

Senator Wong, who is in New York, has given Mr Turnbull until Parliament resumes on October 19 to finalise his desired amendments or "the Government's capacity to consider these amendments seriously and with appropriate prudence would be significantly constrained".

She said the Government remained "willing to engage in discussions in good faith and with a clear focus on the national interest".

"It is difficult to see how the Opposition could enter into a good faith negotiation with the Government if the time frame outlined in this letter is not met."

The ultimatum was prompted by the Sydney Morning Herald's interview, published yesterday, with the Opposition's new emissions trading spokesman, Ian Macfarlane.

With the Coalition bitterly divided, Mr Macfarlane said a series of amendments was being written and would be ready for consideration by the shadow cabinet in a fortnight. It would be put to the party for approval when Parliament resumed.

Mr Macfarlane believed the two-week sitting period would be needed to sort out a final position.

"That gives us two weeks of Parliament where the party room can have direct input into the negotiations and that's my goal," he said.

"At the end of the parliamentary sitting, we've then got another two weeks to basically prepare for the legislation," he said.

The Government will reintroduce the legislation in mid-November. If it is blocked by the Senate, as it was in August, the Government would have a trigger for a double-dissolution election.

Senator Wong is not prepared to allow the Coalition party room the whole October fortnight to debate the amendments. She wants them presented "immediately" after Parliament resumes so the Government has enough time to consider them before the November sittings.

The first party room meeting is not scheduled until October 20.

"The legislation has been available in its final form for more than three months and the policy process has been under way for over 18 months. I would therefore expect the four weeks between now and October 19 to be ample time for the Opposition to finalise amendments," Senator Wong said.

It is implicit that if it misses the deadline, the Coalition risks an early election by stating the legislation to be reintroduced in November will be exactly the same as that rejected in August.

The ultimatum increases the pressure on Mr Turnbull, who faces a revolt within the party room to delay any negotiation until next year, after other nations have stated their intentions at the climate summit in Copenhagen.

He supports this position but also reasons the Coalition must be ready to do a deal in November because of the threat of an early election.

Mr Macfarlane told ABC Radio yesterday the Coalition's chances of winning an early election were "significantly diminished". After such an election, the Government would hold a joint sitting of Parliament and pass its bill, unamended. It was far better to negotiate in November to save jobs.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
An opposition that doesn't want an election? What a jelly belly lot of gutless wonders. There could be no better way to oppose the governments devastating ETS catastrophy than a full blown election revealing to the Australian people the horrendous costs to the community that this stupid scheme would entail. Come on opposition, oppose and seek government.
Posted by Bobby of Tara, 23/09/2009 10:34:57 AM
Good on you Rudd! It's about time Turnbull and his Liberal cronies stand and deliver on this issue! If not they all should take the slow boat back to Vaucluse!
Posted by tigerdicky, 23/09/2009 3:47:22 PM
Bring on two elections - Federal and NSW. We are having a red-hot poker stuck-up our collective backsides at every level of Labor administration.

None of the KRudd 'revolutions' has materialised, except for the debt revolution.

Didn't the Kyoto Treaty signing make a big difference, didn't the SORRY apology make a big difference, didn't Fuel Watch & Grocery Watch make a big difference, didn't the Alopops Tax Grab make a big difference? What about the bank guarantees, didn't they make a difference? Yes, but only to the BIG Four's balance sheets.

The First Home Buyers Grants are a disaster in progress but not fully realised until the real unemployment figures kick-in, and the Cash-Splash was excellent for China via our retailers.

Bring on both elections ASAP and let's have some transparent debate on what is really going on in Australia, economically and socially!

Posted by Clark Goodwin, 24/09/2009 7:28:27 AM
The opportunity is there for the Opposition to put up or shut up. We don't want to go back to a Liberal govt which ground Australia into the ground.

Yes, our debt has increased but look at what has occurred. We are beginning to plan long-term for the first time as a nation in many areas. The govt is trying to implement change, some of which I question - but they are trying.

Howard had the chance and failed, dismally. If anyone wants to compare notes look at how R&D and innovation declined on his watch. Ag research suffered the knife - and the majorly and the Nationals stood by and let it happen.

We are now global laggards in the innovation circle. Come on, look at the big picture instead of just your back paddock.

Posted by Opposition short sightedness, 24/09/2009 9:28:13 AM
I wish the press would forget this rubbish. There is no way Rudd would go to an early election on this issue. An election is due in 2010 anyway, and he might choose to go at the earliest date, rather than a double dissolution.

It is all hype and rubbish. But then what are the press for if not hype and rubbish. We have all had our own children, so we know what over-reaction and exhuberance does to the immature.

Posted by denis, 24/09/2009 12:13:50 PM
" Howard had the chance and failed, dismally............" You can't possibly be refering to John Winston Howard, of Australia, are you? He did some discpicable things, but he also paid off the debt run up by the Hawke-Keating circus, and left the economy in a decent shape when he was (thankfully) voted out. KRudd & co have run us back into debt in no time, and couldn't plan and execute a decent chook raffle. You'll find that the NSW LABOR government has shredded the ag research funding, not the feds. The problem is, none of the front bench politicians, or their advisors have had a real job in at least a decade before entering the government gravy train, and none of them will do the right thing by the nation unless the nation turns off the tv, gets off the lounge and forces them to do the right thing.
Posted by bill, 27/09/2009 3:41:56 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Climate Change Minister Penny Wong
Climate Change Minister Penny Wong
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
22 September, 2009
21 September, 2009
POLL
Q: Can plant and animal breeders produce enough food to meet future global needs without the development of new genetically modified crops?

Yes
(53%)

No
(41.8%)

Undecided
(5.2%)

Total Votes: 668
Poll Date: 20 September, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...