News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Probe carbon claims: Garnaut 

Probe carbon claims: Garnaut

21 Jun, 2009 04:00 AM
Professor Ross Garnaut has called on Australia's competition watchdog to thoroughly investigate claims that some Australian businesses have been exaggerating the impact of emissions trading on their operations.

The Australian Conservation Foundation and the Australian Climate Justice Program have submitted a 200-page brief for the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission comparing what they say are inconsistencies between claims made by some Australian companies to political leaders and those made to investors.

The companies named by the ACF and ACJP are Boral, BlueScope Steel, Caltex Australia, Rio Tinto, Woodside Petroleum and Xstrata.

Professor Garnaut, who the Government commissioned to compile a review into emissions trading in Australia, said the ACCC should pick up the investigation immediately.

"If it is true that some Australian business leaders have been saying something to government in the political debate and contradictory things to their investors then this is a very serious problem for Australian business," he said. "If allegations have been made that that has happened then that needs to be investigated."

Professor Garnaut also took aim at new-found climate change sceptic Senator Steve Fielding saying he had also spoken to respected atmospheric physicist Richard Lindzen, who Senator Fielding met with on a recent trip to the US, and discounted his opinion that the global warming effect of carbon dioxide is overestimated.

"I would have been delighted if there were 10 or 20 or better still 100 of Richard Lindzens around the world but unfortunately he's a one off," Professor Garnaut said. "It would be imprudent beyond the normal limits of irrationality to grab one dissenting view among the serious climate scientists and say 'I am going to believe that and not to believe the views of all of Australia's credentialed climate scientists'."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Given some of the outrageous claims made in the media and in representations to politicians, including commissioned reports, in relation to global warming, the question is, will Professor Ross Garnaut, the Australian Conservation Foundation and the Australian Climate Justice Program allow the ACCC to compare apples with apples? Because politicians, in seeking votes, are incapable of conducting their own unbiased reviews on this subject, isn’t about time that all these claims including the science behind the claims are put before some form of judicial review or Royal Commission ?
Posted by Dr Bob, 21/06/2009 12:41:44 PM
Dr Bob is right! we should have a clear and open discussion of all Climate Change, Emissions, Carbon Taxes, Carbon Trading, Power of all sorts & Global warming. Surely we can't be asked to blindly follow a plan by Professor Ross Garnaut & Politicians without real comparison of like systems?
Posted by Seniac, 22/06/2009 8:34:46 AM
It is a pity that the media in general are not like Dr Bob and Seniac. The media blindly accepts press releases from anywhere and does little investigation of its own into the subject. Hence we end up with legislation based on sensationalism, emotion, and not facts, figures and economic analysis as it should be.
Posted by John Michelmore, 22/06/2009 9:41:07 AM
Guys the clear and open discussion has been happening for years in peer reviewed papers, it is just the anti-global warming arguments don't stand up to scrutiny.
Posted by the lorax, 22/06/2009 10:04:59 AM
I would like the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) to investigate the mining company that Garnaut is involved with to determine if the standards Garnaut applied in his climate gig have also been applied to his company reports. Garnaut accepted a claim by the Fenner School at ANU that there were huge, previously unknown and unexplained, amounts of carbon emissions that could be saved by ending native forest harvesting. The problem was, and remains, that they didn't bother to release the source data for normal scrutiny. We are still waiting. And if Garnaut's mining company has been in the business of accepting reports of huge undiscovered resources without scrutinising the source data then ASIC has some serious work to do.
Posted by Ian Mott, 22/06/2009 10:34:44 AM
I seem to remember a bloke by the name of Galileo who had different views to the "conventional wisdom' of his time. Since the modus operandi of the environmental fundamentalists is to scare, cajole and attempt to shame people into action through hyperbole and exaggeration, is it little wonder that the other side (already branded the devil incarnate) do the same? This confrontationalist style of debate is distracting, divisive and childish. Senator Fielding may actually be a calming influence on the whole hysterical (and I don't mean funny) bru ha ha. All this posturing and insult flinging reminds (disturbingly) me of two primative tribes meeting in ceremonial battle. Neither side suffers unduly and little is resolved. Grow up and get on with the task of thinking and creating our way out of this.
Posted by MickPeanut, 22/06/2009 10:48:42 AM
Typical of all who march to the beat of the enviro-political drum, Mr. Garnaut’s remarks are laced with the language of the intellectual suprematism that now permeates Western World politics, the electronic media & EU & UN. To such extent does suprematism now dominate the EU that the collective MPs of 27 EU States, have blatantly & arrogantly refused to abide by the result of the Irish Republic referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. As all historians know, it was the suprematism of Germany & Japan's ruling classes that gave rise to World War 2. Given the intellectual suprematism of the Western World’s ruling & influential classes, the fear-driven pursuit of nuclear weapons by Middle Easterners is scarcely surprising. Today both the print & electronic media rant & rave about the endemic crime, violence, vandalism, promiscuity, drunkenness, drug addiction & racism plaguing the world, when in truth of fact, such endemicity is a social reaction to the oppressive terms & conditions of life that intellectual supremacists have & continue to thrust upon society. Given the regulatory oppressiveness & financial persecution of consumers that lurks within the legislative fabric of the ETS Bill, the above named social endemicity can only get worse.
Posted by jock, 22/06/2009 12:51:39 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Professor Ross Garnaut
Professor Ross Garnaut
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
18 June, 2009
17 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the deregulation of the wheat industry's single desk marketing system been beneficial to grain growers?

Yes
(25.4%)

No
(50.4%)

It's too soon to tell
(24.2%)

Total Votes: 476
Poll Date: 14 June, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...