News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Northern Taskforce told not to investigate new dams 

Northern Taskforce told not to investigate new dams

10 Feb, 2010 01:26 PM
NEW dams were not to be investigated by the taskforce looking at developing northern Australia as the country's next big food bowl, it was alleged in parliament this week.

The news comes following the disappointing findings by the committee revealing Australia's north will never be a big food production hub, despite its abundance of rain and market potential with its proximity to Asia.

The report by the Northern Australia Land and Water taskforce was tabled by Parliamentary Secretary for Northern Australia Gary Gray on Monday, and virtually knocked on the head any hopes of developing the north with new Ord-like water storages and infrastructure projects.

It dashed large-scale river irrigation hopes, pointing instead to working more with groundwater to encourage "mosaic" farming development.

At the Prime Minister's 2020 summit in 2008, developing northern Australia as the food bowl of Asia was one of the key agricultural "visions" put forward by rural delegates.

The taskforce was first established by the previous Howard Government in 2007 with a $30 million budget to commission studies and explore some frontier potential for agriculture to remove pressure from Australia's ailing Murray Darling Basin, which is home to more than 60 per cent of Australia's food production.

Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, re-jigged the taskforce in 2008, stripping it of all but about $1 million, and giving it a more environmental focus which has been harshly criticised by the Opposition.

It emerged in Senate Estimates this week that the taskforce was told it would not be necessary to look at the need to develop more dams, and the report out this week suggested the North's topography and rainfall patterns would not make dam building suitable.

Queensland Liberal Senator, Ian Macdonald, said the report was "meaningless" and "inconsequential", while his NSW counterpart, Bill Heffernan – who initially chaired the taskforce – said the taskforce should have looked more outside the square and been more forward thinking to investigate new ideas and opportunities.

He said the taskforce only looked at old science and did not think more broadly about new ways you could store water in the north if dams weren't appropriate.

National Farmers Federation president, David Crombie, said it wasn't all bad news for the north with the recommendation for more science and research a good thing, he believed.

He said the report highlighted strong prospects for expanding the northern pastoral industry with big opportunities highlighted for already strong cattle sector.

But much better infrastructure and a streamlining of regulations cross-border were vital, he added.

Cattle production across the north of Queensland, the Northern Territory and Northern WA could be doubled according to the report, and be worth four times as much.

Existing regulations would have to be relaxed so production was made easier, farmers have said in response.

Minister for Agriculture, Tony Burke, said some people had built a level of expectation for the north that was "never going to be fulfilled".

"It was never going to be the case that the north of Australia would replace the MDB," Mr Burke said.

"But it is the case that more can be done in the north than has been done there in the past.

"Everyone always knew the soils were a significant limitation, the fact that most of the rainfall came in a few months of the year was a massive limitation as well.

"This report goes a little bit further into showing how few places there are where you could actually dam and store significant water.

"My view is this offers a little bit more hope for the north than what many people thought was going to be there."

He said the challenge with new infrastructure would be the big wet seasons each year which would treat that infrastructure very harshly.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The navel gazing in this report is a wonderful and shining example of shortsightedness and a little tad of political influence on the subject of dam building so that result is certain to be what the politicians and greenies want.
Posted by Trugger, 10/02/2010 3:31:26 PM, on Queensland Country Life
What a joke this country has become. The new infrastructure challenge is the big wet season each year. How the hell does all of Asia cope then under these same big wet seasons each year. It is amazing how in times past we were able to do great infrastructure projects around Australia with a much smaller population and much less money. Things like hydro schemes, bridges like Sydney Harbour Bridge and railways running most places which are now rundown and mostly shut down. Easier to throw money in the wind than do anything worthwhile. We must appear useless to our neighbours to the north with our vast mining royalities and potential agriculture production which is being wound back with regulation and red tape. Unless things change quickly this country will grind to a halt.
Posted by Max, 10/02/2010 8:31:38 PM, on The Land
Sounds like this a foregone conclusion! Do the Labor communists...eerr government actually want Australian industry or do they want to sell everything and we all live as peasants? There is a huge need for an Australian Farmers Union that does a decent job and isn't afraid to stand on toes. A mandate for real and sustainable agriculture in Australia that doesn't pussy foot around, but is a hard hitting voice for primary production.
Posted by andrewfreshwater, 10/02/2010 10:09:13 PM, on The Land
What is lacking is will power. Goverments love quick projects that deliver votes inside election cycles. We have not had a far sighted statsman since John Forrest and Cy O'Conner took water to Kalgoorlie a 100 years ago. More votes giving money to those unemployable or those who want big plasmas.
Posted by THE FARMER, 10/02/2010 10:56:20 PM, on Farm Weekly
I have been travelling to NT and Kimberley for past 6 years or more trying to develop exports using the much fund-wasting East Arm terminal in Darwin as exit port instead of fruit etc going South then being exported from mainports there. I have seen what can be grown in these areas and have also seen the vast amounts of water that runs straight out to sea lost to Australia. Agtree totally with THE FARMER in that the money spent on these endless Study coomssions is irresponsible of any Government as they only plan for the next election an dwhat they can put out there they will do for Australia should they be elected/ re-elected. What could be done with all these Billions wasted on these copmmissions if a Practical, Industry/ Land based committee or study group was formed to pusue the real practical workable oiptions for growing in the NT cannot be disregarded just to suit these political parties, it is a discrace that people not caring about the areas they are paid enormous amounts to report to are used in this way, people who will not complain if the Government restricts the area of findings they can achieve from the study as they get paid no matter what
Posted by THE NT BIZDEV FAN, 11/02/2010 8:30:01 AM, on The Land
From my easrlier, these commision professionals know they will be used again by Gov as they gave them the conclusions they wanted - it is a joke. look at the ORD Stage @, I was in Kununurra when Fed and WA Ministers were there getting their photos taken announcing all th emoney they were giving to this yet when I was again in Kununurra almost one year later, there still had been no progress on allocations of th eland to various products - the wry ( and tru ) staements form locals all pointed to the fact that if the region was a mining project, the WA Gov would have passed everything straight away but becasue it is an Agri/ Horti project, it does not matter. Further it was likely to be used by large Corps giving investmetns to tree planting just to better their carbon foot print and not just for Sandalwood timber investemtn instead of horticutural purposes even like cotton or rice growing - what a waste PLUS th emango and citrus growing there ??? All of no interest to Gov
Posted by THE NT BIZDEV FAN, 11/02/2010 8:35:37 AM, on The Land
What a crock of $**t, this report is, with its pre-arranged result, organised to meet Govt political requirements, rather than a true examination of resources and potential. Why is it, that Australia, during WW2, with a population of only 4M, was able to supply adequate food to a vast number of American troops in our region, supply enough food to feed all our troops, as well as the Australian civilian population - and then still had enough left over, to send large quantities of food to the U.K., to avoid mass starvation of the British people? For those with no historical knowledge or interest in the past, the AMF had agricultural sections that planted and worked vegetable gardens covering relatively small areas, in places as remote and diverse as Alice Springs and Darwin. These vege gardens produced bountiful supplies of food from relatively small areas, and the Military agricultural production was only a drop in the ocean, of the potential of any of these areas. The people who drew up this report, would have to go down in history as the most myopic, politically aligned, useless group of assembled "experts" ever to waste taxpayers money on a report, that is worth precisely nothing
Posted by Ron N, 11/02/2010 9:34:03 AM, on Farm Weekly
The report says that agriculture is not really feasible because it only rains for a couple of months every year. Well lets compare this to the MDB where you get rain all through the year do you. At least there is guaranteed rainfall in the wet season.
Posted by John, 11/02/2010 9:48:04 AM, on Queensland Country Life
The world community has every right to conclude that urban Australia has squandered its right to exercise sovereignty over the north. And I cannot think of a single argument to counter that conclusion. These sickos who govern us will do and say anything at all to support their hideous anti-farmer perversions. And we need to ask ourselves if defending it for the likes of Rudd and Bligh is really a cause worth the life of a son or grandson. We all know that regional Australia supplies a disproportionate part of the men and women who defend this country and it is about time we collectively reassessed the sacrifices that urban Australia takes for granted. Stop propping it all up, it will only delay the necessary collapse and rebuilding.
Posted by Ian Mott, 11/02/2010 10:59:05 AM, on Queensland Country Life
I agee with all the above comments.
Posted by Kevin Rude, 11/02/2010 12:57:37 PM, on The Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
09 February, 2010
08 February, 2010
POLL
Q: One year on from the Black Saturday bushfires, do you think governments are now conducting adequate preventative backburning?

Yes
(5.3%)

No
(89%)

Undecided
(5.7%)

Total Votes: 563
Poll Date: 07 February, 2010

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Pro-Tech
 
Metromax
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
photo gallery
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL Twitter
 
QCL Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...