News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Labor is pandering to polluters, say Greens 

Labor is pandering to polluters, say Greens

30 Jun, 2010 06:05 AM
The federal government has been accused of playing semantics after telling the Group of 20 it had no fossil fuel subsidies to phase out under an agreement reached by world leaders last year.

Leaders at a G20 summit in Pittsburgh in September agreed they would submit plans to gradually cut fossil fuel subsidies as the world limited greenhouse gas emissions.

In a leaked submission to the G20 meeting in Toronto at the weekend, the government said that it had ''no inefficient fossil fuel subsidies''.

Environment groups and the Greens estimate the government hands out subsidies worth about $5 billion a year - mainly through fringe benefits tax concessions for company cars and fuel tax credits to primary producers including the mining industry.

A study in 2007 by Chris Riedy, research director at the Institute for Sustainable Futures at the University of Technology, Sydney, put the annual figure, including state subsidies, at more than $9 billion.

The government's submission to the G20 is in line with a view that the agreement was aimed at ending large, direct subsidies promoting fossil fuel production in developing countries.

It says that Australia does not have measures related to the production or consumption of fossil fuels that fall within the scope of the G20 commitment.

The Greens spokeswoman on climate change, Christine Milne, accused the government of redefining ''fossil fuel subsidy'' to avoid upsetting industry. ''Take away the fuel tax credit for the miners and see if they think they have lost a subsidy,'' she said.

The Greens leader, Bob Brown, has written to the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, calling for legislation for an interim $23 carbon tax, later to be upgraded to an emissions trading scheme, within three months if Labor won the election.

The Climate Change Minister, Penny Wong, said the government had tried to negotiate over the Greens' proposal, but found they were not willing to consider an economically responsible compromise.

Ms Gillard told ABC radio she would have ''something to say'' about climate change before the election. ''I think there is a concern in the Australian community about what is happening next on climate change and I want to be talking to people about that.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Another reason not to vote Green, they tells lies about things like this. There are no direct subsidies on offer to any fossil fuel industries. But there are plenty of massive direct subsidies on offer to so-called renewable energy, most of it which doesn't even work reliably. Renewable energy such as useless windpower wouldn't even be viable without handouts. The Greens want all power to come from renewables, who is going to pay for it? The tooth fairy?
Posted by harry, 30/06/2010 7:28:33 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
28 June, 2010
29 June, 2010
POLL
Q: Has the elevation of Julia Gillard to the Prime Minister's office made you more or less likely to vote Labor at the next election?

More likely
(16.4%)

Less
(47%)

No change
(36.6%)

Total Votes: 1090
Poll Date: 27 June, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...