News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Irrigators back calls for Adelaide to put up or shut ... 

Irrigators back calls for Adelaide to put up or shut up on water

16/09/2008 3:26:00 PM
Irrigators in South Australia are backing calls from the Queensland Farmers' Federation for Adelaide residents to put up or shut up on the issue of water by slashing their own daily consumption in order to help save the Lower Lakes.

In a submission to the Federal Senate's inquiry into the Murray Darling and what can be done to save the Lower Lakes from drying out, the QFF says that up to 55 gigalitres of water a year could be saved if Adelaide residents were put on the same level of restrictions as residents in Brisbane.

Adelaide households last year used an average of 235 litres per person per day compared with 153L in Brisbane.

"It's a bit steep in my view for Adelaide and South Australia residents to complain about Queensland irrigators, who are only about 3-5pc of the water usage in the basin, when the people of Adelaide have not agreed to the same level of water efficency as the people of Brisbane," QFF chief executive John Cherry said.

"QFF also questions the merit of targeting water holdings in the upper catchment as a means of watering the lower lakes, pointing to losses of upwards of 70-80pc in moving the water downstream.

"The only solution in the short to medium term is for rain across the Murray-Darling catchment to increase flow to the lakes."

It's a call backed by SA Murray Irrigators chairman Tim Whetstone who has been arguing the same point for 18 months.

"Under the current arrangements in this state, Murray irrigators and their communities are the only people bearing the brunt of the drought," Mr Whetstone said.

"SA Water has no volumetric restrictions on their clients.

"It is long overdue that a user pays system was implemented right across the State.

"It is time the Premier started governing for all of South Australia and not just Adelaide.

"To this point Adelaide residents have been shielded from the reality of the River Murray and the drought.

"It is time water restrictions that reflected the real situation were implemented.

"Only then will South Australians have the type of credibility required to drive a Basin-wide rescue strategy."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Looks like farmers who live in the real world know that rain is the only answer while the rest is window dressing for the majority who believe that milk comes from the shop and has never heard of the part the cow plays.
Posted by Richie 10 on 16/09/2008 10:24:13 AM
Let's put things into perspective. 55GL would raise the Lower Lakes by about 50mm. They are currently about 250mm below sea level.
Posted by Steve on 17/09/2008 10:14:04 AM
Why does everyone upstream have to suffer from severe water restrictions - both imposed and from nature - while Adelaide expects to maintain itts water use regardless? Hypocracy at best.
Posted by Richard on 17/09/2008 7:25:04 PM
Bendigo, from where Messrs Bracks and Brumby have generously donated water for the environmental flow to keep the mouth of the Murray open, has been on water restrictions for years now.

The people of Adelaide should find it a privilege to water their lawns and gardens, wash their cars, maybe even drink water that is not recycled.

We of Bendigo have had that privilege taken away just for you!

Posted by Blind Freddy on 17/09/2008 8:22:22 PM
How about a cap and trade policy on the number of children allowed per family?

The bottom line is that there are simply too many people and not enough water sources.

Posted by Philip J. Frazee on 17/09/2008 8:56:31 PM
how about some rain water tanks in adelaide. they still seem to think the water from the murray is endless and when it isn't blame everyone but themselves.
Posted by Kylie on 18/09/2008 8:33:34 AM
235 lires per person per day for Adelaide residents is only part of the problem - add in the evaporation losses of the city's water storage at Menindee, and you get a frightening figure of what Adelaide's take of the water pie really is.
Posted by antonbiz on 18/09/2008 9:37:59 AM
Comparing Brisbane in a summer rainfall region with Adelaide in a winter rainfall region is distorting and confounding.

Why not compare Adelaide with Cairns or the Amazon to get a really silly water use figure?

If this type of 'logic' is taken to its 'logical' endpoint, farmers should pay the same amount per megalitre as do Adelaide residents. Adelaide has been using water from the Murray for a century before water thieves overallocated the resource.

Posted by Annoyed on 18/09/2008 2:39:51 PM
Most of the comments I have just read are simply not correct. How can you compare Adelaide to Brisbane... check out the annual rainfall for starters. What has continually astounded me is Bribane's low resevoir levels mostly all year round. What are they doing with the rain... can't they harvest it. Mind you we can be criticised in this regard as well because we can do a lot better. Our gardens are looking pretty good at the moment but only because of the winter rains. We can water once a week for an hour with a hand held hose, wash and rinse our cars with a bucket and shower 4 minutes daily. I won't mention the toilets but most of us operate on the principal "if it's brown wash it down, if it's yellow let it mellow and don't forget to put the lid down". I don't want to hammer the riverland people but their gardens appear pretty good all year round. It's time the government shifted the cotton and rice growers north where they should be and at the same time worked out how the Indonesian's can put out their all year round peat fires. That's what causing it all. Those fires have been burning now for 10 years.
Posted by Will on 20/09/2008 6:40:55 PM
Adelaide is on severe water restrictions - watering of gardens for two hours a week with a hand held hose is allowed. Adelaide takes a tiny amount of the Murray's water even in a drought year. As for the lower lakes they used to be estuarine before the barrages. Two thirds of south australia's water allocation is evaporated off them to maintain them as freshwater lakes - in an ordinary year that's over 1000 gigalitres. In the process the ecology of the coorong has been destroyed and the mouth needs constant dredging to do what nature used to do with tidal flow. OPEN THE BARRAGES!!!
Posted by Rich on 21/09/2008 9:05:41 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Do you believe the Rudd Government has a plan for the future development of inland Australia?

Yes
(7.1%)

No
(89.4%)

Undecided
(3.4%)

Total Votes: 757
Poll Date: 14/09/2008

21/11/2008 | AWI's new board can only succeed in old battles by fighting in new ways.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...