News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Govt water buyback reaches new phase 

Govt water buyback reaches new phase

8/09/2008 2:45:00 PM
A new Government tender to purchase water from irrigators to help restore the health of Murray-Darling Basin rivers and wetlands will open next Monday.

Water Minister, Penny Wong, has today announced the latest phase in the irrigation licence buyback, which she says will only involve water from willing sellers in Queensland and northern NSW.

"This tender is the first step in the Rudd’s Government’s $400 million program to purchase water entitlements in the northern section of the Murray-Darling Basin," she said.

The tender call coincides with the first day of business for the head of the new Murray-Darling Basin Authority.

Former chief executive of the South Australian Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, Robert Freeman, starts work today as the chief executive of the independent authority.

"We are delivering on our election commitments to purchase water for the rivers and to establish a new, independent authority to manage the Murray-Darling Basin in the national interest," Sen Wong said.

"We are facing a critical situation in the Murray-Basin which is the result of years of over-allocation, drought and climate change.

"The tender being announced today will help us move towards restoring Basin rivers and wetlands to health."

With a process currently underway in some parts of Queensland to separate water entitlements from land, Sen Wong said conditional contracts would be struck as necessary with sellers ahead of that process being finalised.

* Program guidelines will be available from next Monday 15 September at www.environment.gov.au/water or by calling 1800 218 478.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The government is taking advantage of farmers stricken by drought which is forcing them to become so-called "willing sellers". Water is undervalued and Penny Wong knows this, that's why the buy up is taking precedence over improvements to infrastructure which would save water and guarantee a viable future for Australia's vital food producing areas.
Posted by Kevin Rude on 8/09/2008 9:12:37 PM
It’s a shame that all these South Australians keep targeting everyone else. Adelaide is pumping from the Murray Darling right now and they are only on level 3 water restrictions! Clean up your own back yard before you start accusing everyone else senator Wong.
Posted by Don on 9/09/2008 8:10:13 AM
Blow up the barges in South Australia. Queensland has been robbing NSW of water. Victoria has the best allocation system. Stay away Government from buying Southern Area's water.
Posted by Brendan on 9/09/2008 8:43:14 AM
Kevin, if we were not in drought they would not need to buy back. Farming systems in Australia developed over the last 200 years, the riverine ecology developed over several Millon years. Farmers can be supported and can adapt to the changing landscape, the ecology has nowhere to go. We need to act - if you have a better idea to a water buy back please put it on the table and let's go with it but until then we need to do something now as once the river is destroyed it won't be coming back.
Posted by Ian on 9/09/2008 8:51:17 AM
Let's put things in perspective folks. There's enough water in a station near Bourke that's coming up for auction soon (90 gigalitres), to supply Adelaide's water requirements for more than 6 months! We're not asking for much, just a healthy river and a bit to drink.
Posted by Steve on 9/09/2008 9:17:17 AM
The Rockefellers are here!! Water is the new oil. We have WMD (Water for Mass urban Distribution) Irrigators, run for cover!!
Posted by Vivendi Water Company on 9/09/2008 9:29:59 AM
Comments like those of Kevin Rude are very annoying. The reality is that a lot of farmers' water licences cost them next to nothing, and they are selling to the Government at a huge profit. With drought, climate change and over-allocation many licences would have been worth nothing in the future. The Governments are doing some farmers a huge favour by allowing them to get out of farming with a few dollars, or out of financial trouble.

The whole issue of overallocation should have been sorted out before trading of water licences was permitted. Then the taxpayers would not be footing such a huge bill.

Kevin Rude wants improvements in infrastructure. So do I, but they will take a long time to have any effect, and some of those effects are debatable. With only half the water savings going back to the rivers, and reduction of leakages from the irrigation systems into the rivers, we might finish up with less flow in the rivers.

Posted by Barney on 9/09/2008 9:35:20 AM
There would be no water to buy back if our wise forefathers had not built the dams in the 1st place. Instead of taking water from "willing sellers" put the money into infrastructure. EG Bradfield Scheme on Clarence River puts water into Darling System & would allow water to be held back in southern storages. But that would be too hard for this lot. What's wrong with this idea? We could have Hydro elect. & more water for irrigation to grow CO2 absorbing crops???
Posted by Will on 9/09/2008 9:40:23 AM
Steve, where is this mythical 90 gigs in a station in near Bourke? Can you name the station - i doubt it cause it doesn't exist. The only way this water would reach you Adelaide to give you a bit to drink would be to bottle it and transport it via road train to Adelaide - then no doubt the 'carbon footprint' of this water would mean that no self respecting climate change/global warming believer would be able to touch it!!!
Posted by eye on the Outback on 9/09/2008 9:50:45 AM
Barney, I think you'll find that most southern irrigators have paid good money for their water licences either when they purchased their farm or later if they bought additional water. Northern irrigators may have had licenses given to them but they have then had to spend big dollars on infrastructure on their farms. There have been dry periods in the past & we are in one now. Wetter times will return and when the dust settles on all the climate change hype Australia's ability to produce food for a hungry world will be in tatters as our regional communities have been decimated by indiscriminate water buy-backs.
Posted by Kevin Rude on 9/09/2008 7:47:36 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: If a Federal election was held next weekend, for which party would you vote?

Labor
(12.2%)

Liberal
(38.2%)

Nationals
(27.5%)

Greens
(8.6%)

Family First
(1.7%)

Independent
(7.3%)

Undecided/Other
(4.5%)

Total Votes: 1040
Poll Date: 7/09/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...