News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 GM field trials yield promising results 

GM field trials yield promising results

30 Mar, 2009 06:20 AM
Preliminary trials in Victoria show that genetically modified wheat could lift production yields by about 20pc and GM pastures could economically boost the dairy, beef and wool industries.

Molecular Plant Breeding CRC chief executive Glenn Tong said trials of its drought-tolerant wheat in 2007 and last year were "very promising" — with yields of the GM wheat up to 20pc higher than non-GM wheat under drought stress.

"We have to be very cautious about the interpretation of these preliminary results and bear in mind that there are many field trials to come," Dr Tong said.

Similarly, he said CRC modelling indicated dairy cows eating GM varieties of perennial ryegrass could produce 20pc more milk.

Dr Tong showed the preliminary results of the various trials and economic impact modelling to the annual conference of the Victorian Farmers' Federation Grains Council last week.

Molecular Plant Breeding CRC, based at Bundoora in northern Melbourne, is conducting the $28 million, seven-year GM drought-tolerant wheat project in partnership with BASF Plant Science, a plant biotechnology subsidiary of German chemical giant BASF.

The commercial partner for the GM grass trials is New Zealand agricultural company PGG Wrightson, with the overall project valued at $36 million.

Dr Tong said yield calculations in the modelling were based on Australian Bureau of Resource Economics yield data from the past 38 years.

About half the years analysed were drought-stressed in some way.

"If a 20-25pc increase in yield could be achieved for the drought-stressed years, that translates at the farmgate to a $15 to $115-per-hectare gross benefit to the farmer," he said.

The GM drought-tolerant wheat is not expected to be released to the market for at least another eight years.

"There will be another four or five years of trials," Dr Tong said, followed by three or four years to gain regulatory approval, for example from the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator in Australia and similar authorities overseas.

Dr Tong said it was crucial to produce more wheat to feed the world's growing population.

Annual wheat productivity was growing by 1.1pc globally, but annual demand was growing by 1.7pc.

"If this continues, we will have a serious shortage of a staple crop," he said.

The threat of more frequent droughts from any climate change made the development of a drought-tolerant GM wheat crucial.

Most multinationals have given up research into GM wheat, concentrating instead on corn and soy, he said.

Molecular Plant Breeding CRC, which receives funding from the federal and state governments and commercial partners, has a team of 25 on the GM wheat project.

Dr Tong said it would probably cost BASF about $100 million to take the experimental products through regulatory approvals in the key markets.

The CRC also has several GM trials in Victoria of perennial ryegrass. One is perennial ryegrass engineered to produce less lignin and more fructan.

Dr Tong said this made the ryegrass more digestible and more energy-rich, increasing the amount of energy that animals could extract from the grass.

This made the animals — whether dairy or beef cattle, or sheep — more productive.

"Improving the quality of the feedstock will create an output that is bigger in quantity and better in quality," he said.

In dairy cows, that meant more milk that was higher in quality.

Dr Tong said preliminary estimates were that this could translate to an extra $500 income a year from the average cow, just for the fructan technology.

The estimated 20pc extra energy created by the GM ryegrass was based on conservative modelling, he said.

Lignin and other technologies under development would deliver extra economic benefits.

Dr Tong said a big side-benefit could come from animals producing less methane.

"If the grass is more digestible, this could translate to more efficient fermentation, which in turn could translate to less methane being produced," he said.

"But this hypothesis needs to be tested in animal trials in the future."

Dr Tong said he estimated the ryegrass project should create a commercial product by about 2015.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Glenn Tong makes outlandish claims about the productivity of Genetically Manipulated (GM) wheat under drought conditions. The Molecular Plant Breeding CRC's website shows they are still at the stage of discovering genes which means failure if far more likely than success. Here's why:

A recent Bureau of Resource Sciences (BRS) report (Australia’s crops and pastures in a changing climate – can biotechnology help? by Julie Glover and others) takes a far more cautious and realistic view of the technical feasibility of GM crops. The BRS says: "In the short term, conventional breeding techniques, with the aid of molecular marker technologies, are perhaps more likely than genetic modification to result in significant yield improvement under environmental stress due to the complex nature of the genetic pathways involved. This is likely to be the case for most traits which can be affected by a changing climate, such as nitrogen-use efficiency, frost resistance, waterlogging tolerance and control of the timing of flowering."

And: "GM crops with insect resistance, herbicide tolerance, high-lysine content and, to a lesser extent, disease resistance have already proven to be technically possible. These are traits which are controlled by manipulating or inserting a single gene. As a general rule, the more complex the trait, the more genes are required to control that trait and hence ... traits such as water-use efficiency and heat tolerance have multi-genic inheritance patterns and, therefore, plants modified for these traits have not progressed far down the product development pipeline."

Tong doesn't tell us that if a commercial GM plant were developed, it would be owned by the German project partner BASF - another case of publicly funded research for private profit. Genetic Manipulation by the CRC is a huge waste of scarce public research and development resources that should be invested in smarter systems for sustainably managing soil fertility and water resources on drought-ravaged farms.

Posted by Bob Phelps, 30/03/2009 12:28:01 PM
This is great news for Australian growers. Sure it's early days and there is a lot more work to do, but if our farmers are to be more productive and sustainable into the future new technology will need to be part of the equation. It's a shame that there are still people out there who refuse to accept that GM crops have been benefitial to farmers and the environment. GM cotton helped farmers reduce insecticide use by around 80% and GM canola is showing promising signs of increasing yields and oil content while reducing the use of persistant herbicides. Although organic food is good option for consumers, it takes much more land to produce that conventional crops. GM crops are helping growers produce more using less inputs and with drought tolerance hopefully less water or land......how else are we going to feed a dramatically growing world population and preserve the environment?
Posted by supportfarmers, 30/03/2009 7:33:49 PM
Dr Tong said: "We have to be very cautious about the interpretation of these preliminary results." I'd say we need to be extremely cautious and shut the whole GM project down. It is a total waste of resources, industry funding for what? It's time these scientists started some real work on plant breeding that will benefit the farming community, not the fat cats.
Posted by ggwagga, 31/03/2009 6:41:11 AM
Good propaganda from Mr Tong. But how many farmers are stupid enough to believe that ANYTHING can provide a 20% increase in feed?
Posted by Susan Anderson, 31/03/2009 7:12:00 AM
Regarding the ongoing debate about GM crops have a look at http://africanagriculture.blogspot.com/2009/03/resistance-to-gm-crops-falling.html Some innovative research with GM technology in Africa looks to overcome the scourge of maize streak virus, which can regularly cause up to 90% yield loss in the crop in Africa. All the basic research being done in Africa too! I am sure that GM breeding technology such as this can greatly assist plant breeders all over the world to beat diseases like this.
Posted by nswnotill, 31/03/2009 7:54:48 AM
These types of articles could be considered a joke. Articles with some substance would be more promising. Reports should be very cautious about printing the interpretation of preliminary results. Cows can produce more and emit less methane if fed a more nutritious diets so how about printing some articles with more facts and guts with less maybes & coulds and more wills and does.
Posted by Richard Woolley, 31/03/2009 8:15:44 AM
Bob Phelps shows again the extreme ignorance of anti-GM fanatics. Here are the facts: The Molecular Plant Breeding CRC has taken the drought tolerant, lignin and fructan traits into field evaluation, which is a significant step towards bringing these traits to market. We are certainly not at the gene discovery stage. The CRC has also ensured in its agreements with its commercial partners that all of these traits will be accessible by Australian farmers. If a commercial GM drought tolerant wheat becomes available, the CRC has ensured that it retains the Australian commercialisation rights and will ensure that Australian farmers gain the maximum benefits. And Bob, read the article. The time lines for introduction of these products have been made crystal clear. The fact that these products need time to develop should mean that we support and fast-track this process rather than encouraging complacency.
Posted by Dr. Glenn Tong, 31/03/2009 8:22:01 AM
We have heard all this before and if I am correct we heard it all about the GM Canola varieties which have proven to be no where near what they had so called data on from previous trials. Anyone can manipulate trial data or have differing interpretations of trial data but the simple fact is that there is no evidence of its increased yield, as will be the case with the GM Wheat. We don't live in a perfect environment anymore and we are best funding other areas of plant breeding and soil health which will actually benefit us as growers rather than those who are giving us the trial data and also happen to own the technology. This article really says nothing.
Posted by themule, 31/03/2009 8:25:06 AM
Thanks Dr. Rong for confirming just how much Australian science is owned by off shore commercial interests. Of course you have to find in favour of BASF otherwise your project funding would be compromised. Why not add into your research the amount of human health problems caused by high grain diets/high gluten and high fructose diets??? You are researching increased productivity of a product the farming of which has destroyed the planet's most fertile grasslands and plains and is now found to be at the source of the global obesity problem. If you really are looking for a drought/saline tolerant and (even better) perennial grain to solve the human overpopulation problems, why not revisit the work done by Lefroy et al on the Australian native grass Microlaena stipoides. They did win a Eureka Prize for this work - on a fraction of the funding. We are still hunter gatherers or has your funding asked you to forget this? By the way thanks for confirming that the more indigestible the diet for bovines the greater the methane gas production which is why feedlots should be banned.
Posted by deb, 31/03/2009 10:03:52 AM
As a grain grower in central west NSW the majority of people commenting against GM technology don't have a clue about modern grain production. I also believe that most have never set foot on a farm or been west of Katoomba.
Posted by Grain farmer, 31/03/2009 7:49:53 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Dairy cows could produce more milk, of a higher quality, if trials of GM perennial ryegrass prove successful. Photo: Neil Newitt
Dairy cows could produce more milk, of a higher quality, if trials of GM perennial ryegrass prove successful. Photo: Neil Newitt
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
26 March, 2009
27 March, 2009
29 March, 2009
POLL
Q: Are land clearing laws having a negative environmental impact on your property?

Yes
(67.7%)

No
(30%)

Other
(2.2%)

Total Votes: 496
Poll Date: 29 March, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...