News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Fight fails to protect bush water from mines 

Fight fails to protect bush water from mines

16/10/2008 5:08:00 PM
Independent Federal MP Tony Windsor has blamed "irresponsible party solidarity" by Labor members for the defeat of an amendment he had introduced in a bid to protect rural groundwater supplies from mining developments.

Mr Windsor singled out South Australian Labor MPs for voting along party lines to defeat his amendment that he says would have provided greater knowledge of the groundwater catchment system of the Murray-Darling Basin and could have provided greater security for Adelaide's water supply.

Mr Windsor moved an amendment to the Water Amendment Bill 2008 this morning in a bid to empower the Federal Government to override State mining interests.

It would have committed the Government to holding an independent inquiry into the affects of long-wall mining on groundwater on the Liverpool Plains and other areas that form part of the Murray-Darling Basin catchment.

"The Federal Government has a mandate and responsibility to override the interests of State Governments to ensure the security of the nation's water supply," Mr Windsor said.

"The issue goes beyond the Liverpool Plains and the Murray-Darling Basin catchment.

"It extends to all rivers and catchment systems as part of a national water management strategy."

Mr Windsor moved that: "Prior to exploration licences being granted for subsidence mining operations on alluvial floodplains that have underlying groundwater systems forming part of the Murray-Darling system inflows, an independent study must be undertaken into the impacts of such mining on those systems.”

The Government opposed Mr Windsor's amendment saying that the Bill already allowed for the Minister or the Murray-Darling Basin Authority to cause such a study to happen.

Mr Windsor argued that whilst this may be the case, it does not compel the Minister or Authority to order such a study to be done.

"The people of the Liverpool Plains farming community continue to seek an independent study into the impact of long wall mining under the Liverpool Plains before it commences," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
If in fact the Act already allows for the evaluation of impacts to occur, then the suggested change should have been no problem. The Hawkesbury River and Georges River in NSW are classic examples of longwall mining impacts; festering sores that the Aquatic ecosystem is expected to deal with.
Posted by Fishing for a living on 17/10/2008 5:10:52 AM
it's obvious the federal government is all wind and will do anything for the mining companies. all the hype about saving the murray and all other river systems in australia is all talk and south australia's cry for water must have fallen on the elected parlamantarians deaf ears. it shows that they are only there for themselves and what they can get out of it, not the good of the country or their state. tony windsor has more brains than the rest and takes all things into account when making a decision he thinks outside the square.
Posted by petro on 17/10/2008 6:59:11 AM
Tony Windsor is probably wrong, you cannot propose something so simple and get the other bone heads in the house to accept it! I mean where are all the study, the research, the emeritus Professor papers, the committees and all the public servant/advisers?? How can you make such an important decision, we are talking about water!!, without having spent a minimum of 5 years researching the possible effects of such a demand!! I've done my bit for global warming, more HotAir!!
Posted by Peter on 18/10/2008 5:02:00 AM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Do you believe that buying back irrigation properties is the best way for the Federal Government to address water shortages in the Murray Darling Basin?

Yes
(25.6%)

No
(70.1%)

Other
(4.3%)

Total Votes: 679
Poll Date: 12/10/2008

21/11/2008 | AWI's new board can only succeed in old battles by fighting in new ways.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...