News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 ETS to cost 1.9pc of farm production in first year 

ETS to cost 1.9pc of farm production in first year

01 Jun, 2009 02:48 PM
The economic value of farm production in broadacre industries could decline by between 0.3 per cent and 1.9pc in 2011 as a result of the Federal Government's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, according to a new report from ABARE.

The report, Effects of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme on the economic value of farm production, says the impact will vary depending on the degree of cost-price pass-through from processors to farmers.

The ABARE research released today shows that the initial effect of the CPRS on the value of farm production will differ between sectors, based on the proportion of emissions intensive inputs, the emissions intensity of production and the extent to which agricultural processors also pass on their increased costs to farmers.

The greatest effects in 2011 are expected in the dairy industry, with average farm income estimated to fall by 1.9pc (around $1800), assuming 100pc cost-price pass-through.

"Although the analysis suggests the effects on Australian broadacre agriculture could be larger by 2015 (ranging from falls of 9.1pc to 14.5pc), it does not take into account likely actions by farmers to implement lower emissions production and management practices," ABARE executive director Phillip Glyde said.

Mr Glyde said agriculture would be affected by the introduction of the CPRS in 2011 through increases in input costs.

"There is also a possibility that agricultural processors will pass some of their higher costs on to farmers through paying lower prices for inputs from farmers," he said.

But Mr Glyde said the CPRS, in combination with a global response to climate change, would reduce the expected negative effects of climate change on agricultural productivity in Australia.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The fact that the government are sitting today for discussion of the ETS, one can only hope they come to their senses. New discoveries are happening in solar & other green technologies on a constant basis & it won't be long now, that the transition has a rippling effect on how we receive energy. Cars are getting greener & carbon tax is becoming a bogus scheme so fast, the public will just end up losers if it is introduced.
Posted by Atheistno1, 2/06/2009 8:45:09 AM
How correct you are Atheistno1, we do need to look for alternative energy sources and savings for the sake of peak oil if nothing else. Lumping the Australian economy with an ill-conceived ETS will do nothing but break Aussie businesses resulting in loss of jobs to overseas. When will Govt realise that it is better to use a carrot rather than a stick. An ETS will only benefit financial instutions trading carbon credits and the associated public service jobs managing the scheme. Governments seem to have forgotton that they are there to serve the people - not the other way around !!!
Posted by cowfarmer, 2/06/2009 9:24:14 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
01 June, 2009
29 May, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you support the recommendation to maintain the national beef levy at $5 per head sold?

Yes
(39.2%)

No
(51.6%)

Undecided
(9.2%)

Total Votes: 697
Poll Date: 31 May, 2009

Most popular articles




Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...