News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Emissions trading to hit Aussie food processors 

Emissions trading to hit Aussie food processors

15/09/2008 7:20:00 PM
Struggling areas of the Australian food processing sector will feel the heat of the Federal Government's emissions trading scheme, according to the Australian Food and Grocery Council, which says many manufacturers will have to shut up shop as they become uncompetitive against international goods.

The AFGC, which speaks on behalf of the $70 billion sector, is urging the Federal Government to either impose a new tariff on food imports or adopt a carbon price of no more than $10 a tonne - half the level recommended by the Government's top climate advisor, Professor Ross Garnaut.

The sector has annual sales and service income in excess of $70 billion and employs more than 200,000 people – almost one in five of the nation’s manufacturing workforce.

Of all Australians working in the industry, half are based in rural and regional Australia, while the processed food sector sources more than 90pc of its ingredients from Australian agriculture.

It is also warning that consumers will face "significantly higher" prices for food, drinks and groceries.

"The potential for the cost impact of [the ETS] to erode the industry's comparative advantage based around cheap energy, high quality inputs and available land should not be under-estimated," the AFGC's submission states.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
And I suppose the money from the carbon tax will have to be used to alleviate the devestation the tax causes. Real wisdom .
Posted by Richie 10 on 15/09/2008 7:42:18 PM
The AFGC should tell the government to provide us with the proof of Global Warming because a lot of us believe it is all rubbish.
Posted by Patrick on 16/09/2008 6:01:43 AM
We know costs will go up for energy in general, and it is predicted that this will be by a few % points, this is nothing compared to what we have suffered this past 12 months, Fuel 20%, fuel levy 17%, some pesticides 15%, insurance 11%. The bigger cost is if we do nothing about emissions, there is simply too much evidence that man's impact on the earth at large is too great. Many in horticulture are adjusting, so too should other agribusinesses.
Posted by Alice and frank on 16/09/2008 8:06:07 AM
It will be a rediculous situation if imported goods are allowed in to compete against home made products, if they don't have the same emmisions costs associated. If not attached in the country of origin then it is only fair that there be an import tarrif put on. Otherwise we are once again selling our own industries down the river.
Posted by Ian on 16/09/2008 9:03:09 AM
I agree ---Show us the proof ! Also ---Can't we wait until some of the major pollutors of the world throw there hat in the ring as well ? Or should we try to single handedly fix this problem ? If there is a problem !!!
Posted by Bushy on 16/09/2008 9:42:06 AM
I would like to know where to buy our Aussie produce - the "fresh food people" seem to have nothing but imported goods on their shelves.
Posted by Richard Woolley on 16/09/2008 2:31:08 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Do you believe the Rudd Government has a plan for the future development of inland Australia?

Yes
(7.1%)

No
(89.4%)

Undecided
(3.4%)

Total Votes: 757
Poll Date: 14/09/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...