News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Don't go soft on emission cuts, Rudd told 

Don't go soft on emission cuts, Rudd told

4/12/2008 10:58:00 AM
More than 50 environment groups have delivered an urgent letter to the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, calling on him to reject advice to set a low 2020 target for the reduction of Australia's greenhouse gas emissions, saying it would "represent a profound failure" by his Government.

The critical letter was also delivered to all federal Labor members and senators just hours before the cabinet's climate change subcommittee was due to discuss the issue, which has become increasingly fraught inside the Government.

The letter was signed by environment leaders who have worked closely with the Rudd Government, including Greg Bourne from the World Wide Fund for Nature and Don Henry from the Australian Conservation Foundation, along with activist organisations such as Greenpeace and GetUp!.

The letter notes the "growing and disturbing speculation" that the Government's 2020 target to cut emissions will be in the range of 5pc to 15pc below 2000 levels.

This target is significantly below the 25pc to 40pc cuts suggested as necessary by the United Nations' scientific body for developed countries like Australia if the world is to avoid dangerous climate change.

The environment groups tell Mr Rudd in the letter that the 2020 targets his Government sets to cut greenhouse gas emissions "will be the defining test of your leadership".

It warns that without ambitious targets, Australia will not be able to play a leadership role at the UN climate negotiations.

The Climate Change Minister, Penny Wong, has been working to complete the targets for the emission cuts, which will be implemented from 2012.

Last week she reneged on a commitment to take the targets to the current round of UN climate talks in Poland and delayed their announcement until December 15.

As the UN climate talks opened in Poznan this week, officials from developing countries warned that richer countries must agree to make emission cuts of between 25pc to 40pc by 2020 if they want to secure a global climate agreement next year in Copenhagen.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Would the city enviromentalists please butt out. Seriously, what a load of rubbish. The way this country is going, we won't be able to do anything without registering with the CO2 police.

All this global warming business is total fraud, designed to push the agenda of the far-left political forces that are behind it.

You only have to walk the streets in Melbourne to find young "socialist alliance" members pushing windfarms and the like

Posted by phil on 4/12/2008 9:33:46 AM
Mr Rudd must stick to his guns in relation to the 2020 carbon emissions target, but he should not need radical environmental groups to tell him this, he should be listening to the community as a whole. He should be informing the community of the reports that have been written by various international scientists and highlighting the consequences if we don't respond.
Posted by concerned on 5/12/2008 6:03:04 AM
why have governments let so many enviroment groups become established? it appears that all the dole bludgers are lining up and finding another way to extract money from the tax payer. get rid of them and put the tax dollar to better use and throw the bludgers in the services for a couple of years to make them wake up. we don't need 50 odd groups of enviromentalists that have gone way overboard with duplication. no wonder we can't get sensible decisions from them - too many ratbags with strange ideas.
Posted by petro on 5/12/2008 6:30:14 AM
Another tax system !! Why do we let this happen?
Posted by Will on 5/12/2008 6:43:18 AM
It is strange that all these groups TOTALLY ignore tha developments of Geodynamics and the hot rock technology that will be up and running in the next few years. The tenement alone in South Australia will be the equivalent to 20 Snowy schemes, producing power at today's rates. There are other areas that have this potential, incuding the Hunter Valley. All this producing electricity with ZERO emmisions. Wind farms and solar will be out the window.
Posted by jerangle on 5/12/2008 6:48:21 AM
I'm sure the voters of Australia prefer to eat food rather than carbon credits. Especially in times of financial hardship and uncertainty...like what's happening now! Mr Rudd needs to tread very lightly on this topic. And I think he knows this.
Posted by Ben on 5/12/2008 9:33:22 AM
Some amazing posts here ! Yep, let's just keep living unsustainable lives. Australians are per capita, amongst the highest global polluters. But why should that matter, we are clever and will "always" find solutions...right ? Strong government is needed because the older I get, the more I realise voters need direction & action not more debate.
Posted by MMS on 5/12/2008 10:15:44 AM
Concerned says Rudd should listen to the Community. The community has been bombarded by a propaganda campaign from the Alarmists for the last ten years. Those with discernment know that their claims of catastrophes are completely unfounded.
Posted by Len on 5/12/2008 10:17:59 AM
Rudd should be listening to the community (who don't want an ETS) and listen to the weather (it's not warming globally and hasn't for 10 years). By all means focus on *actual* pollution, sustainable forestry, GM crops (which use less pesticide) etc. but global warming isn't an argument about sustainability; it's about a new tax on production. Pure and simple.
Posted by DMS on 5/12/2008 4:04:15 PM
Why are we not allowed to hear from the many scientists that are sceptical of the Global warming industry? Is this not some form of censorship by our media, especially the ABC.
Posted by ann on 7/12/2008 10:50:44 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Environmentalists write urgent letter to Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, warning Australia against setting our emissions targets too low.
Environmentalists write urgent letter to Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, warning Australia against setting our emissions targets too low.

Q: Would grain growers be better or worse off if AWB and ABB merge?

Better off
(48.7%)

Worse off
(36.5%)

No change
(14.8%)

Total Votes: 337
Poll Date: 30/11/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...