News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 CSIRO overhaul by Rudd may cost 2000 rural jobs 

CSIRO overhaul by Rudd may cost 2000 rural jobs

26/06/2008 10:28:00 AM
Rural and regional Australia could lose up to 2000 environmental science jobs under a radical overhaul of conservation funding by the Rudd Government.

Funding for Landcare has been cut by 20pc, and hundreds of regional conservation projects are being wound up as the Government reallocates funds to meet its 2007 election promises.

Two of Australia's most successful marine conservation organisations SeaNet and the Marine Coastal Community Network will not receive any more money with the founding of the Government's $2.25 billion Caring for Our Country grants program.

The chief executive of OceanWatch Australia, Anissa Lawrence, said: "SeaNet is an immense loss. These are the people who turn policy into action.

"They are the front line of conservation."

In a letter advising the network that would receive no further funding, the Department of Environment said the decision-makers had considered ''whether the project will implement 2007 election commitments (or) fulfil a Commonwealth obligation''.

Federal Greens senator Rachel Siewert said the Rudd Government's new grants program was ill conceived and had been "a shambles from the start".

"It seems to consist of cutting funding to successful programs in order to start afresh in 2008-09," Sen Siewert said.

"This is madness: we are not learning from years of knowledge and experience."

The Opposition's environment spokeswoman, Dr Sharman Stone, said the Government's new grants scheme forced small community groups to compete against the CSIRO and other Commonwealth agencies.

Funding for regional catchment management groups had been slashed from $300 million to $25m.

"The Rudd Labor Government seems to have forgotten that protecting the environment isn't just done from behind a desk: someone also has to be behind a shovel," Dr Stone said.

Replying to questions in the Senate yesterday, Climate Change Minister Penny Wong said the new grants program presented "a range of more targeted opportunities".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It seems rural aus is just not sexy enough. Not enough 20second sound bites. Not enough votes. Not enough photo opps. No chance for K-Rudd to speak chinese. No place for Kevin 07 to get drunk with strippers. Ruddites seem to have about as much substance as those who wear the white fedora.
Posted by THE FARMER on 26/06/2008 11:11:59 AM
If CSIRO is not to the forefront of Australia's "smart country" then Penny Wong and Peter Garrett need to change name of their departments. Without CSIRO, cities will also suffer in the long run!
Posted by dr bob on 27/06/2008 9:41:13 AM
CSIRO is not the font of knowledge any more, if ever it was. And unfortunately, it is retreating to Canberra. So many ag and environment programs actually require people and programs outside Canberra; and that costs money and support to locate people and their families outside huge cities. Large rural towns are appropriate core locations for most of these programs but they are getting the chop.....Merbein, CSIRO Horticulture in Darwin, some QDPI sites.......we need more not less staff in these types of locations. As well as for community programs, after all that was how Landcare started. Have they forgotten the essence of the system?
Posted by R See 1 on 27/06/2008 11:07:00 AM
So soon we are seeing what our new Prime Minister is really like. What a hypocrite!Stripping funding for research! Wow what next? When did Trotsky do this? Or is this Pol Pot in reverse? Or is it just a bad episode of South Park we are living in?
Posted by Dave on 27/06/2008 6:24:14 PM
Too true. All our taxes are heading for bureaucrats' pockets, with less money at the environmental coalface, carrying out projects on the ground. So essentially, nothing will improve - not salinity, land degradation, vegetation conservation, nothing. It is absolutely disgraceful. It is just as well that Landcare started out with no govt resources, because it will have to do without them again...disgraceful. All so that they can provide tax cuts that are not really needed by the majority of people. When will they learn that at the end of the day you can't eat and drink money, and if you don't care for these things now, our society will really be in trouble in twenty years time!
Posted by sarah on 28/06/2008 9:59:40 AM
The smart country Kevin. Give the kids computers and fast broadband so we as a nation can lead the way and hold your blowtouch to the WORLD. Sack all the existing scientists - who needs them as their parents probably did not come from ordinary working families. Go for it Kevin keep smiling as you dumb it down and down.
Posted by mabel Peton Smyth on 28/06/2008 11:46:19 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: What should the Federal Government do to relieve the cost of petrol?

Continue with its current approach
(4.2%)

Cut petrol excise by 5c/l
(1.6%)

Cut petrol excise by 10c/l
(29.9%)

Invest petrol revenue in alternative fuel research
(39%)

Mandate 10pc biofuel content in petrol
(13.3%)

Other
(11.9%)

Total Votes: 428
Poll Date: 23/06/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...