News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Climate changes future on the land 

Climate changes future on the land

29/06/2008 12:17:00 PM
Australia faces future shortages of common foods, higher prices and nutritional declines in some grains, fruits and vegetables unless urgent action is taken to help farmers adapt to climate change, a new CSIRO report warns.

Cauliflower, lettuce, celery, potato and spinach crops could fail with only small temperature increases, and warmer nights will cut the sugar content of peas, strawberries and melons.

Hotter summer winds will increase pineapple crop losses, and rising temperatures will affect the pollination and ripening of tomatoes and avocados.

The report's co-editor, Mark Howden, said: "We can adapt, but we need to be driving those changes much harder and faster than we are at present."

The 360-page report by CSIRO's Climate Adaptation flagship says Australia should not under-estimate the long-term challenge of climate change and must boost investment on research into how all sectors of agriculture can adapt to climate risks.

Despite Australia's vulnerability to climate change and the many threats to food production, it says, fewer than a dozen potential adaptation measures have been evaluated for their effectiveness and "only a couple" have been costed in terms of their potential benefits.

"Adapting to climate change will involve everything from changes in crop varieties, through to improved seasonal forecasting, up to revised national policies and programs," Dr Howden said.

"The past climate is no longer a good guide to the future climate, so having the skills and resources to respond flexibly will be essential."

For many farms and agricultural businesses "incremental changes may be enough", but some regions and industries would need to consider "more transformative changes".

The CSIRO report examines the impact of climate change on grains, cotton, rice, sugar cane, wine grapes, horticulture, forestry, grazing, livestock and fisheries.

"We've applied the latest climate change projections to build a picture of the challenges that will affect all types of agriculture in all corners of the nation," Dr Howden said.

The report's findings suggest climate change will reduce the quality and market value of Australia's $4.2 billion wheat crop unless new heat-tolerant varieties are developed.

Higher temperatures will cause a 50pc increase in damage from heat shock, reducing the amount of wheat grain protein and its suitability for bread and pasta flour.

Farmers will be forced to sell crops to lower-value markets for biscuit flour, biofuels or stockfeed.

Higher rainfall intensity is tipped to increase dryland salinity by 20pc and make crops more susceptible to fungal and viral diseases.

The report says simple adaptations new wheat varieties, altered crop plantings and improved water management could be worth up to $500million to wheat farmers.

Other climate-change risks include: Difficulty in meeting increased livestock demand for drinking water.

Greater energy demand to artificially cool intensive piggeries and poultry sheds.

Heat stress in dairy cows, leading to reduced milk production and declining pasture quality.

The report suggests, as one solution, creating clusters of "agricultural industrial parks" to moderate increased water and energy demands by intensive livestock industries.

It also identifies the possible use of solar panels to generate energy for air conditioning and the imposition of a carbon tax to regulate energy use.

The report states: "The energy demand for climate control in production units where livestock are farmed in indoor climate-controlled conditions is likely to increase. The majority of this energy is generated by coal-fired power stations, and is likely to incur a carbon tax of some kind, adding to the cost of energy.

"There is also likely to be competition for peak supply with residential users and other industries, potentially resulting in brownouts in some areas."

Intensive livestock production which requires drinking water for livestock, irrigation water and evaporative cooling for farm sheds will be competing with towns and cities for limited water resources.

Climate change is also projected to increase competition between farmers and the emerging biofuels industry for livestock feed.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
As the hysteria over global warming rises to a crescendo we should be worrying much more about the hysteria than the global warming. Here again we see a compounding of worst case hypothetical scenarios depicted as science. Much of this so-called science is downright bogus.

On 20th June The Independent carried a 6300 word article declaring that "we are to blame" for Bangladesh being flooded by rising sea levels. Yet the sea level has not risen significantly at Fort Denison, or at any other fixed location in the world.

Bangladesh, like New Orleans, is on the delta of a major river. If the sea is flooding Bangladesh it is because Bangladesh is sinking, not because the sea level is rising. Yet governments around the world are making decisions on the basis of this bogus "science".

Posted by Ted O'Brien on 30/06/2008 8:26:40 AM
Crops are already failing, eg the australian pistachio crop failure of '06 and partial failure of '08 due to lack of winter chill. Sea levels are rising every time another lump of ice crashes into the sea and as a result of the expansion of sea water as its temperature rises.
Posted by graham brookman on 30/06/2008 12:19:46 PM
It is sad to see what should be our better minds serving out this drivel as confirmed fact in the Climate Change Swindle.
Posted by Len on 30/06/2008 4:17:14 PM
What used to cause the droughts & floods before there was climate change?
Posted by Kevin Rude on 30/06/2008 7:02:04 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Do you trust the Greens to handle the Senate balance of power responsibly?

Yes
(22.1%)

No
(74%)

Undecided
(3.8%)

Total Votes: 728
Poll Date: 29/06/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...