News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Burning can be better for environment 

Burning can be better for environment

22 Mar, 2010 07:37 AM
PRESCRIBED burning is not just better for bushfire prevention: with some exceptions, it can be better for the environment, too, bushfire expert Phil Cheney believes.

In a dry eucalypt forest with litter and shrub understory - a habitat description of many of Australia’s peri-urban developments and the villages devastated on Black Saturday - Mr Cheney says that a prescribed burn that leaves 70-80 per cent clean burned ground will not carry a fire under extreme conditions for at least a year, and fuel loads will not again reach their full potential for another 15 years.

He suggests that forests need to be managed around a checkerboard pattern of prescribed burns, with initially not less than 10-12 per cent of a forest burnt each year on an eight-year rotation.

After the first cycle, fresh burns might drop to eight per cent of the forest, but not less. Certain sensitive areas could be excluded from fire management.

The result, Mr Cheney argues, will be a forest with a far greater diversity of habitat, and in which a fire will eventually meet a fresh burn and peter out rather than razing the entire area.

“... I believe that Aboriginal people across Australia understood very well what would be the consequences of widespread fire in continuous fuel during the dry season,” Mr Cheney writes in the latest AFI Farm Policy Journal.

“Because they had little, if any, capacity for suppression, they burnt regularly to protect themselves and the continuity of their food supply.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


No comments yet. Be the first to comment below.

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
18 March, 2010
21 March, 2010
POLL
Q: Should any of the three AWI directors criticised by Italian manufacturers earlier in the month resign?

Yes - all three
(64.6%)

Yes - but only Olssen and Sheil
(2.7%)

Yes - but only Modiano and Olssen
(0.4%)

Yes - but only Modiano and Sheil
(0%)

Yes - but only Olssen
(1.9%)

Yes - but only Sheil
(0.8%)

Yes - but only Modiano
(0.8%)

No
(29%)

Total Votes: 525
Poll Date: 21 March, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...