News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Another 'green revolution' needed before 2050 

Another 'green revolution' needed before 2050

01 Oct, 2009 04:56 PM
THE UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) has thrown down what appears to be an impossible agricultural challenge to expand food output drastically on a planet with depreciating land and water resources.

In order to feed the extra 2.3 billion people expected to be on the planet by 2050, the FAO said last week the world will have to produce 70 per cent more food.

Annual cereal production will need to increase by nearly one billion tonnes to meet this mark, and meat production by more than 200 million tonnes.

About 90 per cent of the necessary increase will have to come from increased crop yields and cropping intensity, according to the FAO discussion paper, while extra arable land will have to be found - 120 million hectares of it in the developing world.

In Australia, director of CSIRO's Sustainability Agriculture Flagship, Dr Peter Carberry, says the world demand for food and fibre will eclipses climate change as the world's next great challenge.

The "21st Century Agricultural Revolution" is going to have to repeat the Green Revolution, Dr Carbery says.

But that will have to be achieved with much greater constraints on farming land, irrigation, energy and nutrients - and with the wildcard of climate change added into the mix.

At FAO, assistant director-general, Hafez Ghanem, this week was reported as being "cautiously optimistic" about the world's ability to meet this challenge, although he was uncertain of the effect of climate change and the impact of biofuels.

The statistics formed part of a discussion paper prior to a "high-level expert forum" on the global food challenge in Rome in October.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Last year, these same sort of comments caused a major spike in world grain, fuel, mineral and other prices. We were told that the food shortage that loomed would blow the world to bits and that we needed to produce as much as possible as quickly as possible at any cost.

Well, history will reveal one day that this was the biggest scam of the modern world and that the farming suckers who heeled the collective call to arms were the victims of a collective, greedy world media campaign. They fuelled the patriots with high-grade garbage that has cost us billions.

Maybe if they waited another year to publish this piece of earth shattering non truth. I would have sucked up to it again. Sorry, not this time. The scars are still bleeding.

Posted by Jacob, 1/10/2009 11:02:24 PM
For the FAO to now confirm the food and fibre challenge provides a thought direction for grains farmers to sharply increase on farm storages.

Is the drought breaking? Is it time to construct more on-farm dams with liners and evaporation retardant to conserve water?

Quoting from Letters, Stock Journal, SA, August 26: "Where clear cutting of forests is now indefensible to create farms for food, we do need to reach out to the gains in yield from biotechnology including genetic engineering, emerging as the most important piece of unexploited knowledge that promises further increased yields from the same hectare of farmland."

If, as the FAO suggest, this is not achieved by 2050 while population has increased by another several billion in that time, Australia might well face a human exodus of frightening proportion from nations unable to feed themselves.

Posted by Robert Stewart, 2/10/2009 4:11:01 AM
Captain Blight in Qld is locking up productive land through ignorance and political expediency and the feds are buying up water to let run away to sea or evaporate. Not to mention the idiotic fart tax on animals, which will decimate the livestock industries.

So the FAO will need to look somewhere other than Australia for this increase in production. Oh well, there is still plenty of timbered areas in South America and SE Asia to cut down.

Posted by R, 2/10/2009 7:31:44 AM
I don't understand this debate about growing more food for a population that is out of control. When there isn't enough feed in the paddock, a farmer doesn't keep breeding more stock.

A farmer can buy in fodder when feed reserves are low. But the global population can hardly obtain food from another planet!

The emphasis must turn to limiting population growth to a sustainable level. That is possibly the intent behind the introduction of GMOs, allowing the toxins from GM to limit population growth, or limit the production of food.

Posted by ggwagga, 2/10/2009 7:32:00 AM
Jacob, I think you must be a simpleton because this report is a projection for 2050 and will not impact prices here and now or even in the next 5-10 years.

The key problem is our population growth. We have a Luddite institution called the Catholic Church declaring contraception as bad. Yet the planet threatens to implode on itself because we simply can't feed ourselves.

If we were an animal population, like kangaroos or brumbies, measures would be put in place because we can see the cause and effect. How are humans different?? This situation requires long-term policy planning that is currently simply being ignored.

Posted by Population control, 2/10/2009 8:34:20 AM
How does the E10 mandate in NSW sit with all this? The mandated, subsidised conversion of 1.5 million tonnes of grain or, deducting the distillers grain byproduct, 1.05 million tonnes of grain starch will be starch taken from the world food supply.

Perhaps there is some truth in ggwagga's comment that our governments are purposfully limiting food to limit population. However, I cannot believe that proposition. I put the stupid decision to mandate and subsidise an E10 and thus the development of a grain ethanol industry in NSW down to overwelming political influence of its advocates. Political donations and high placed lobbyists will always trump common sense with busy city-centric politicans, unaware of the facts.

Posted by Two Bob, 2/10/2009 9:33:32 AM
What a joke!! In this area, our prime horticulture land is now full of timber plantations and the majority of the producers work off-farm because they can't make a quid out of primary production. They all became disillusioned with low product prices, high costs and false promises. Tasmanian blue gums took over. You can't eat them!!!
Posted by pete, 2/10/2009 10:38:56 AM
Market forces - supply and demand will sort out food production. Price goes up, so people produce more, price goes down, people produce less. What is important is not posioning ourselves and our planet in the process.

The Federal Government needs to start to help farmers find systems that allow food to be produced with less fertiliser and no poisons. Its no good having food if we can't live on the planet.

Posted by Peter, 2/10/2009 12:31:02 PM
Peter, which planet are you from? In Australia, our basic food items prices are controlled by two supermarket chains. Those near monopolies control the prices paid to producers. If you believe it's supply and demand, you are sadly mistaken.
Posted by pete, 2/10/2009 2:30:50 PM
Well said Pete & Jacob. I am sick to death of being told how important the food we produce is and then being paid less than the cost of production for it. If the world needs more food then farmers need to be fairly payed for it.
Posted by brokeasscocky, 2/10/2009 8:44:14 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
28 September, 2009
30 September, 2009
POLL
Q: Should politicians who retire mid-term be fined to help recover the costs of holding a by-election?

Yes
(73.4%)

No
(22%)

Undecided
(4.7%)

Total Votes: 473
Poll Date: 27 September, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...