News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 $37m for 10 rural climate research projects 

$37m for 10 rural climate research projects

02 Jun, 2009 05:45 PM
The Federal Government has announced a major research investment to help agricultural industries adapt to climate change, including the grain, grape, dairy, aquaculture and beef industries.

Minister for Agriculture, Tony Burke, has granted a total of $37.6 million for 10 research projects, under the Climate Change Research Program.

In July 2008, the Government announced three priorities under the program: reducing greenhouse pollution, improving soil management and adapting to a changing climate.

Funding has already been committed to projects targeting the first two priorities: $21.4 million for research into soil carbon – including $1.4 million to research biochar – $12 million to research nitrous oxide emissions in soil and $26.8 million to reduce emissions from livestock.

This $37.6 million for the third research priority includes $11 million from the Government and contributions from industry research bodies including Meat and Livestock Australia and the Grains Research and Development Corporation.

"Research is the key to unlocking productivity growth in the face of climate change and other global challenges," Mr Burke said.

"We believe farmers are innovative and constantly adapting to make their produce as competitive as possible.

"That is why we reject any projections that assume farmers won't adapt.

"These 10 research projects show how serious our agriculture, fishing and aquaculture industries are about research and adaptation."

Projects will be established in all states and the Northern Territory and will include:

· Developing genetic traits in wheat and sorghum that suit hotter, drier environments with higher levels of carbon dioxide;

· Investigate potential business opportunities and risks from relocating some production systems to northern Australia, including the peanut, processing tomato and rice or cotton industries;

· Research new grape varieties which are more tolerant to extreme weather events associated with climate change;

· Investigate the implications of climate change for our fisheries and aquaculture industry;

· Research to ease heat stress in the dairy, beef and sheep industries in southern Australia.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Another way to waste money. There is very strong scientific evidence to suggest that the world has now entered a cooling phase. History shows that cold phases have been far mor damaging to mankind than heating phases. Wake up Austalia!
Posted by Bob, 3/06/2009 6:39:35 AM
This direction of public science research for agriculture is pitiful and totally linked to the misguided focus of public science. None of this research will enable agriculture to implement on-farm measures to sustain production and productivity under adverse climate conditions. The research should be aimed at empowering farmers with the capability to build soil health. Farmers need the infrastructure and processes in place that enable them to sustain soil nutrients, soil water holding capacity, soil carbon and the diversity and abundance of soil micro-organisms. This is the basis of nutritious food production. The farm is an energy accumulator through sunlight energy and food production. Urban areas are energy consumers that take food from the farmers and rarely return the nutrients (energy enablers) back to the soil. The developments required now include on-farm production of biologically active fertilisers and delivery of nutrients back to the farm in the form of soil conditioners. This infrastructure and process alone will do more for climate change adaptation in agriculture than any of the research proposed above. Even biochar is not rocket science, however char without all of the other trace minerals is wasted energy. Unfortunately, public science has its hands tied on soil biology by the flow of chemical industry funds into public science.
Posted by Mangiri, 3/06/2009 8:09:02 AM
All urban gardens should include a rain water tank fed vegie garden.
Posted by the lorax, 3/06/2009 10:49:13 AM
Mangiri, I hope you are in a position where your understanding of the situation can influence people who make policy and direct research. I believe everything you said is 100% correct. I, like you, think the same way and am working toward a position where I can assist farmers create environmentally sound farming systems.
Posted by peter, 3/06/2009 1:17:20 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
01 June, 2009
02 June, 2009
01 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you support the recommendation to maintain the national beef levy at $5 per head sold?

Yes
(39.2%)

No
(51.6%)

Undecided
(9.2%)

Total Votes: 697
Poll Date: 31 May, 2009

Most popular articles




Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...