News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Two-way water pipeline a possibility 

Two-way water pipeline a possibility

26/08/2008 6:21:00 AM
Victoria's north-south pipeline could be reversed to carry water from Melbourne to the country under long-term considerations being worked into the project.

The plan to pipe water 70 kilometres from the Goulburn River to Melbourne has enraged drought-stricken communities in northern Victoria, despite assurances that water would be taken only from "savings" generated in irrigation upgrades.

The pipe will increase Melbourne's supplies by up to 75 billion litres a year, but Victoria's top water officials believe the pipe's real significance — its ability to improve water trading around the state — has been overlooked.

Under long-term modelling being conducted by Melbourne Water's pipeline team, the north-south pipe could be reconfigured to send water from southern sources such as a desalination plant to northern regions.

Pipeline project director Rod Clifford said pumping water north would require significant expenditure because the major pumping stations for getting the water over the Great Dividing Range were located north of the divide near Yea.

Such a reversal of water flow is unlikely to occur in the short term.

Before opting to pump water north, Melbourne could effectively trade water to northern Victoria by not extracting its 75 billion-litre pipeline entitlement from the Goulburn River and Lake Eildon.

It could sell the unused entitlement to communities or organisations along the Goulburn River.

Water Minister Tim Holding said the Government was not planning to pump water north.

"If there is ever a point in time that we don't need this water we will simply store it in Lake Eildon," he said.

Government insiders expect there will be many years when Melbourne Water does not take its full 75 billion-litre entitlement through the pipe to Sugarloaf Reservoir, particularly once the desalination plant opens in 2011.

The pipe is the most crucial link so far in what the Government describes as its "water grid", a network of more than 10,000 kilometres of interconnected pipes and rivers.

The grid will enable water from many sources — the desalination plant, Melbourne reservoirs and northern reservoirs — to be connected into the one system.

Mr Holding queried new findings by systems scientist and microbiologist Professor Peter Coombes that the Government had underestimated the potential of rainwater tanks to supplement Melbourne's supply.

In confidential reports for the Government, Professor Coombes argues that previous studies of tanks had relied on readings from one of Melbourne's driest locations, Tullamarine.

He told The Age that tanks could capture 120 billion litres each year, more than twice that previously estimated by Melbourne Water.

But Mr Holding said the figure was between 20 billion and 110 billion litres, well short of the 150 billion litres to come from the desalination plant.

Mr Holding said tanks and desalination both had a role in Victoria's water plan.

But it is not yet clear whether tanks will remain a key part of the the Government's green building code, now being reviewed.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1



Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Ha! Who's going to fall that baloney? The day that the Victorian government (hey, aren't they in Melbourne?!?) gives back the water they are stealing from from Goulburn Murray irrigators so Melbournians can flush their toilets, it will be the day that New york gives the Indians back Manhattan Island! Oh yes beware of flying pigs. I can't see things changing until Australians face a full scale famine (as Europe did after WW11) before they understand the importance of food security and even start to think that farmers and the ag sector is a part of this nation worth looking after.
Posted by Cynic on 26/08/2008 1:33:21 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Do you support AWB's decision to extend the voting period for its push to restructure the shareholding system?

Yes
(48%)

No
(41%)

Undecided
(11%)

Total Votes: 273
Poll Date: 24/08/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
QCL Subscriptions
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...