News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Mirvac Timbercorp's biggest landlord 

Mirvac Timbercorp's biggest landlord

12 Jun, 2009 10:01 AM
AN INVESTMENT fund run by the property company Mirvac has emerged as the biggest single landlord of the collapsed managed investment scheme operator Timbercorp following a warning by Timbercorp's administrator that it might not have enough money to meet rent payments.

Australian Sustainable Forestry Investors (ASFI) - a private wholesale investment fund managed by Mirvac's fund management subsidiary - leased more land to Timbercorp than any other single party. It owned about 20,500 of some 50,000 hectares the forestry company leased and used for plantations across Australia.

Timbercorp's 700 landlords, including farmers and other corporate owners, will soon be asked to grant a 90-day rent moratorium to Timbercorp's administrator as it investigates the viability of forestry and horticultural schemes.

ASFI's land holdings, which it bought from Timbercorp in 2004, are in Western Australia, Victoria and South Australia.

It is understood that Timbercorp paid about $4.6 million a year to rent the land, providing income for the fund.

According to Mirvac's latest property compendium, ASFI had no other assets apart from the 20,500 hectares it bought from Timbercorp last December.

Its assets, combined with the holdings of another Mirvac forestry fund owning almost 13,000 hectares in New Zealand, were valued at $140.7 million at the end of last year.

KordaMentha is preparing letters asking landlords, including the Mirvac fund, to grant a stay of rent. According to an affidavit lodged by the administrator Mark Korda last week, $9.6 million was needed to cover rent for all Timbercorp's forestry schemes for the three months to September 30. The "vast majority" of the leases were due at the end of June, and the responsible entity of the schemes, Timbercorp Securities, had no money, Mr Korda said.

KordaMentha has invoiced Timbercorp growers, who bought sub-leases over timber lots from Timbercorp as investments, for the rent and other expenses. According to Mr Korda's affidavit, fewer than a third had paid by June 4.

Mirvac declined to say yesterday what implications Timbercorp's collapse could have on the fund and its income, or whether the fund would consider KordaMentha's request for a moratorium.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So when can we get the full story on the other major plantation player, Intergrated Tree Cropping (ITC), run by Elders. They have over 150,000 hectares of plantation, sold to investors on claims of 25/30m3 of annual growth per hectare but which, in Queensland have only managed a paltry 5.5m3/ha/year. On that growth rate it will take them 50 years, not 10, to get to marketable pulp log size and the investors will be wistling in the dark after the 30% management fee is deducted from final proceeds. And remember, this was the first outfit to get into bed with the WWF and its so-called sustainable certification scheme that refused to even accept applications from native forest owners. In fact, ITC's promotional blurbs continue to claim that their plantations are "protecting" native forests from harvesting. Yep, these guys can clearfall right to the boundary line and the WWF has the gall to claim that their clonal monoculture forestry is more sustainable than partially harvested, multi-aged, multi-species, native forests.
Posted by Ian Mott, 15/06/2009 12:04:00 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
11 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the Senate reject the federal Government's proposed Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) legislation?

Yes, reject it: the Senate should vote against the legislation passed last week by the House of Representatives.
(62.7%)

No, vote for it: the legislation should be passed by the Senate.
(11.6%)

Postpone it: Senate should wait till after Copenhagen Summit.
(25.7%)

Total Votes: 723
Poll Date: 08 June, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



Queensland Country Life







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...